speech: improvements
This commit is contained in:
75
speech.md
75
speech.md
@@ -53,9 +53,9 @@ any. Nonetheless, I feel like I have something to contribute to the
|
||||
discussion - even if only as living proof that one can exist without
|
||||
having an Instagram profile.
|
||||
|
||||
But you can also take it from Tim Berners-Lee, the inventor of the
|
||||
web, who diagnosed the web with 3 main ailments back in 2019, 30 years
|
||||
after the invention of the web.
|
||||
But since you now know that I am biased you can also take it from
|
||||
Tim Berners-Lee, the inventor of the web, who diagnosed the web with 3
|
||||
main ailments back in 2019, 30 years after the invention of the web.
|
||||
|
||||
... see content on slides ...
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -73,13 +73,15 @@ the beginning of September the US Department of Justice started
|
||||
seizing domains which were used by russian government sponsored actors
|
||||
to imitate Western news outlets. Those websites were filled with AI
|
||||
generated narratives to russia's benefit and Social Media platforms
|
||||
were then used to spread those tales.
|
||||
were then used to spread those tales, targeted specifically towards
|
||||
people who might be receptive to them.
|
||||
|
||||
On a sidenote since LLMs are also a topic at this conference: This is
|
||||
their prime use case. Generating bullshit at scale.
|
||||
|
||||
Operation Doppelganger shows, how Social Media are tools in the hands
|
||||
of enemies of the open society. How did we become vulnerable to them?
|
||||
Operation Doppelganger illustrates, how Social Media are tools in the
|
||||
hands of enemies of the open society. How did we become vulnerable to
|
||||
them?
|
||||
|
||||
A big part of the answer to this question lies in the phenomenon of
|
||||
Surveillance Capitalism as analyzed and described so accurately by
|
||||
@@ -89,10 +91,10 @@ Capitalism". I seriously cannot recommend this book enough.
|
||||
How does Surveillance Capitalism work in a nutshell?
|
||||
|
||||
Before the dotcom bubble burst and venture capital (VC) money was
|
||||
sustaining money burning tech companies, the users' interactions with
|
||||
a web service were used to improve said service. When VCs wanted to
|
||||
see returns on their investments in the early 2000s, tech executives
|
||||
had to look for new revenue streams. And at Google they found them: by
|
||||
sustaining cash burning tech companies, the users' interactions with a
|
||||
web service were used to improve said service. When VCs wanted to see
|
||||
returns on their investments in the early 2000s, tech executives had
|
||||
to look for new revenue streams. And at Google they found them: by
|
||||
diverting some of the gathered behavioral surplus and using it as
|
||||
input material for predictions about our future behavior which are
|
||||
then sold at massive profit.
|
||||
@@ -131,15 +133,14 @@ explains why:
|
||||
|
||||
... see presentation ...
|
||||
|
||||
By the time regulators in the EU regulated surveillance capitalists,
|
||||
they could afford not to adhere to the rules. Why? Because they have
|
||||
grown monstrously rich and powerful. They have captured the regulators
|
||||
by somewhat of a stick-and-carrot policy: In case of adversarial
|
||||
politics, their proprietary algorithms they have undue and obscure
|
||||
influence over election results. In case of good behavior, lucrative
|
||||
consultant positions can be created. In the EU, most surveillance
|
||||
capitalist are domiciled in Ireland - and the local Data Protection
|
||||
Authority does not deserve its name.
|
||||
We can only speculate on why regulators have been so lenient with
|
||||
surveillance capitalists. It probably had something to do with the
|
||||
fact that surveillance capitalists have grown monstrously rich and
|
||||
powerful in the meantime: Just think of the fact that Social Media
|
||||
giant can influence election outcomes with their algorithms. Or
|
||||
lucrative post-political career prospects at surveillance
|
||||
capitalists. Or just the belief that economic growth is good no matter
|
||||
what.
|
||||
|
||||
And if the power dynamics on a societal level are bad, they are worse
|
||||
on an individual level. With extreme foresight Aldous Huxley has seen
|
||||
@@ -176,7 +177,8 @@ Social Media. The level of reduction depends on your preferences. It
|
||||
can very well be 0, but does not have to be. Observe how it affects
|
||||
your life.
|
||||
|
||||
Secondly, there is a better way to use the current Social Media.
|
||||
Secondly, there is a better way to use the currently commonly used
|
||||
surveillance capitalist Social Media.
|
||||
|
||||
The POSSE approach allows you to stay in control of your
|
||||
content. POSSE stands for Publish on Own Site, Syndicate Elsewhere and
|
||||
@@ -186,14 +188,14 @@ describes
|
||||
|
||||
This is what it looks like in practice: This is a screenshot from the
|
||||
FSFE's official Mastodon account (if you don't know what Mastodon is,
|
||||
don't worry, I'll get there in a second). As you can see toot contains
|
||||
a short summary of what a blog post published on the fsfe.org domain
|
||||
is about and the URL pointing to it.
|
||||
don't worry, I'll get there in a second). As you can see toot (think
|
||||
tweet) contains a short summary of what a blog post published on the
|
||||
fsfe.org domain is about and the URL pointing to it.
|
||||
|
||||
Since you're a technical audience: You either know how to register a
|
||||
domain and use a static site generator. For what it is worth, you
|
||||
might even have written one in one of your classes. Even if not, you
|
||||
could figure it out in no time. In short, start a blog. Apart from
|
||||
Since you're a technical audience: You probably know how to use a
|
||||
static site generator. For what it is worth, you might even have
|
||||
written one in one of your classes. Even if not, you could figure it
|
||||
out in no time. In short, get a domain and start a blog. Apart from
|
||||
putting you back in control, it will give you the freedom of
|
||||
expression you've always hoped for. For your non-techie friends,
|
||||
ethical blog hosting sites abound.
|
||||
@@ -218,7 +220,7 @@ decentralised. This image shows you the difference between
|
||||
centralised, federated and distributed network modes. Facebook,
|
||||
Instagram, TikTok, etc. are representatives of centralised
|
||||
networks. Email, on the other hand, is federated as users on different
|
||||
mail servers can interact. Fully distributed systemts, allow
|
||||
mail servers can interact. Fully distributed systems, allow
|
||||
participants to communicate directly with each other, think of
|
||||
torrents for example.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -250,7 +252,8 @@ chronological feed the best? For some maybe yes, for others not. But
|
||||
nonetheless: the Fediverse is infinitely better than the surveillance
|
||||
capitalist alternatives.
|
||||
|
||||
But onwards to the hardest but most important thing to do: reform.
|
||||
But onwards to the hardest but also most important thing to do:
|
||||
reform.
|
||||
|
||||
Better Social Media will only come to bear if we overcome a collective
|
||||
action problem. I will quote Tim Berners-Lee once more:
|
||||
@@ -270,13 +273,13 @@ better Social Media possible:
|
||||
|
||||
... see slides ...
|
||||
|
||||
I want to highlight the last point. As software engineers, we tend to
|
||||
look at a problem and think how can we use tech to solve it. But many
|
||||
societal problems are not technological in nature. Take poverty as an
|
||||
example. Technology is a tool which will always be embedded in a
|
||||
specific social context. Please always reflect on the social
|
||||
conditions of the tech you are building and avoid one-dimensional
|
||||
technosolutionism.
|
||||
I want to end by highlighting the last point. As software engineers,
|
||||
we tend to look at a problem and think how can we use tech to solve
|
||||
it. But many societal problems are not technological in nature. Take
|
||||
poverty as an example. Technology is a tool which will always be
|
||||
embedded in a specific social context. Please always reflect on the
|
||||
social conditions of the tech you are building and avoid
|
||||
one-dimensional technosolutionism.
|
||||
|
||||
I'll leave with you another fitting xkcd comic and thank you for your
|
||||
attention!
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user