fixed structure problems

svn path=/trunk/; revision=13180

projects/os/ps.en.xhtml

@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@
   surfaced multiple times during the debate, for instance in the
   speech of Mr Karsten Meinhold, chairman of the ETSI IPR Special
   Committee,
- <a href="http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/newsroom/cf/document.cfm?action=display&doc_id=3635&userservice_id=1&request.id=0">
+ <a href="http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/newsroom/cf/document.cfm?action=display&amp;doc_id=3635&amp;userservice_id=1&amp;request.id=0">
 who summarised it</a> as "<em>IPRs and Standards serve different
   purposes: IPRs are destined for private exclusive use, Standards are
   intended for public, collective use</em>".</p>
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ who summarised it</a> as "<em>IPRs and Standards serve different
   them. Or, as Tomoko Miyamoto, Senior Counsellor of the Patent Law
   Section in the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) said
   in 
-<a href="http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/newsroom/cf/document.cfm?action=display&doc_id=3633&userservice_id=1&request.id=0">
+<a href="http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/newsroom/cf/document.cfm?action=display&amp;doc_id=3633&amp;userservice_id=1&amp;request.id=0">
 her presentation</a>:
   Patent thickets and patent hold-ups may arise from
   certain forms of legitimate exploitation of the exclusive rights
@@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ her presentation</a>:
   Suzanne Michel, Assistant Director Office of Policy and Coordination
   of the U.S. Federal Trade Commission
   (FTC) 
-<a href="http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/newsroom/cf/document.cfm?action=display&doc_id=3631&userservice_id=1&request.id=0">
+<a href="http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/newsroom/cf/document.cfm?action=display&amp;doc_id=3631&amp;userservice_id=1&amp;request.id=0">
 pointed out in her presentation</a>.
   The FTC had found that <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rambus&amp;oldid=251605519">Rambus
   Incorporated</a> had joined and attended standardisation meetings of
@@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ pointed out in her presentation</a>.
   which Charles Schulz of Ars Aperta summarised as RAND referring to
   "RANDom licensing at the sight of competitors."
   In
-<a href="http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/newsroom/cf/document.cfm?action=display&doc_id=3639&userservice_id=1&request.id=0">
+<a href="http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/newsroom/cf/document.cfm?action=display&amp;doc_id=3639&amp;userservice_id=1&amp;request.id=0">
 his presentation</a>,
   Mr Schulz also pointed out that (F)RAND terms are
   discriminating against Free Software. Even RAND terms linked to zero
@@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ his presentation</a>,
   all IT services and 4% of European GDP by 2010.</p>
 
 <p>In
-<a href="http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/newsroom/cf/document.cfm?action=display&doc_id=3641&userservice_id=1&request.id=0">
+<a href="http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/newsroom/cf/document.cfm?action=display&amp;doc_id=3641&amp;userservice_id=1&amp;request.id=0">
 her presentation</a>,
   Amy Marasco, General Manager Standards Strategy of
   Microsoft, emphasised that she does not consider Free Software a
@@ -407,7 +407,7 @@ her presentation</a>,
 <p>Good patent research costs around 100.000 EUR per case according to
    Rigo Wenning, Legal Counsel &amp; Patent Policy Team Contact of the
    W3C/ERCIM who spoke about
-"<a href="http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/newsroom/cf/document.cfm?action=display&doc_id=3636&userservice_id=1&request.id=0">
+"<a href="http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/newsroom/cf/document.cfm?action=display&amp;doc_id=3636&amp;userservice_id=1&amp;request.id=0">
 Standards, Patents and the Dynamics of Innovation on the Web</a>." The W3C is
    indeed the only Standards Setting Organisation (SSO) that has a
    sufficient patent policy for its standards in order to accomodate
@@ -419,7 +419,7 @@ Standards, Patents and the Dynamics of Innovation on the Web</a>." The W3C is
   damage can be caused by injunctions against a product, or claims for
   damages. In
   his 
-<a href="http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/newsroom/cf/document.cfm?action=display&doc_id=3646&userservice_id=1&request.id=0">
+<a href="http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/newsroom/cf/document.cfm?action=display&amp;doc_id=3646&amp;userservice_id=1&amp;request.id=0">
 presentation of IBM's "SoftIP"</a> concept, Roger Burt, Senior Counsel of IBM
   Europe introduces the issues with a quote from a BSA et al. Amicus
   brief in eBay v MercExchange. The quote summarises the problems of
@@ -442,7 +442,7 @@ order to preserve its business."</em></quote>
   for the largest corporations was introduced by Tim Frain, Director
   IPR regulatory affairs, Nokia in his presentation about
 
-"<a href="http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/newsroom/cf/document.cfm?action=display&doc_id=3649&userservice_id=1&request.id=0">
+"<a href="http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/newsroom/cf/document.cfm?action=display&amp;doc_id=3649&amp;userservice_id=1&amp;request.id=0">
 FRAND Best Practice</a>."
   Mr Frain advocates a system based on "Aggregated
   Reasonable Terms" &amp; "Proportionality" (ART+P).</p>
@@ -530,7 +530,7 @@ FRAND Best Practice</a>."
   the Division of Technical Regulations Department for WTO Affairs of
   the Chinese Ministry of Commerce who raised the question of public
   vs private benefit in his presentation titled
-"<a href="http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/newsroom/cf/document.cfm?action=display&doc_id=3632&userservice_id=1&request.id=0">
+"<a href="http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/newsroom/cf/document.cfm?action=display&amp;doc_id=3632&amp;userservice_id=1&amp;request.id=0">
 Strike the Right Balance between Public and Private Interests in IPR in ICT
   Standardization</a>".</p>