|
|
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<html newsdate="2017-10-13">
|
|
|
<version>1</version>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<head>
|
|
|
<title>FSFE presents modernised Fiduciary Licensing Agreement 2.0</title>
|
|
|
</head>
|
|
|
<body>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<h1>FSFE presents modernised Fiduciary Licensing Agreement 2.0</h1>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>The FSFE and ContributorAgreements.org proudly present
|
|
|
the revised and updated <a href="/activities/ftf/fla.html">Fiduciary Licence Agreement
|
|
|
2.0</a> (FLA-2.0) - a next-generation contributor agreement that makes sure
|
|
|
the contributed software always remains Free Software.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>The FSFE acknowledges that the licensing of code has been well served
|
|
|
by Free Software licences such as the GPL, Apache, BSD, and MPL families.
|
|
|
However, managing rights and content within a project over long periods
|
|
|
of time is still a complex issue.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>To fix this the FSFE with the help of <a href="/activities/ftf/fla.html#authors">knowledgeable experts</a>
|
|
|
drafted the Fiduciary Licence Agreement (FLA) as early as 2002. The FLA
|
|
|
is a well-balanced contributor agreement, which gives the trustee, responsible
|
|
|
for managing the rights within a Free Software project, power and
|
|
|
responsibility to make sure the contributed software always remains free
|
|
|
and open. This way the project, together with all the respective contributors,
|
|
|
are protected against any misuse of power by a new copyright holder.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>The way this works under the FLA is that developers assign an exclusive
|
|
|
licence to the trustee (usually a foundation or company, under whose auspices
|
|
|
the software lies) and in return they receive a non-exclusive licence
|
|
|
of the same extent, as well as a legally binding promise that the code
|
|
|
they contributed will forever remain Free Software.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>In the last decade, the world of IT has changed quite a bit and,
|
|
|
apart from copyright, patents and trade marks have become a serious concern
|
|
|
for Free Software projects.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>With the last review in 2007, the FLA (version 1.2) was long due an
|
|
|
update. So we are delighted to finally unveil the FLA-2.0 – a much improved
|
|
|
and modernised version.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>The biggest improvements are that the FLA-2.0 now also covers patents
|
|
|
and enables more practical licensing options directed towards third
|
|
|
parties – including referencing to an external licensing policy. In addition,
|
|
|
the new wording is much improved both in its compatibility with more
|
|
|
jurisdictions as well as being easier for everybody to understand and
|
|
|
apply.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Furthermore, we have joined forces with <a href="http://contributoragreements.org/about.html">ContributorAgreements.org</a>
|
|
|
and integrated the FLA-2.0 into its Copyright Licensing Agreement (CLA)
|
|
|
chooser/generator, in order to make the use of the FLA easier both for
|
|
|
projects and for developers. As a side-effect, all CLA on ContributorAgreements.org
|
|
|
have been updated as well, following some of the improvements from the FLA.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<blockquote>
|
|
|
<p>As is often in FOSS and life, we are merely standing on
|
|
|
the shoulders of giants. The current update – while itself taking several
|
|
|
industrious years of research and analysis, culminating in a master's thesis
|
|
|
– would not have been possible without the authors of the original FLA,
|
|
|
as well as a great deal of legal research which was the basis for the
|
|
|
ContributorAgreements.org. The sheer community knowledge aggregated in
|
|
|
the FLA-2.0 makes me confident that it is more relevant and useful today
|
|
|
as ever before.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>says Matija Šuklje, former FSFE's Legal Coordinator and the main
|
|
|
driving force behind the FLA update.</p>
|
|
|
</blockquote>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<blockquote>
|
|
|
<p>The revised FLA-2.0 is an outcome of a longstanding and
|
|
|
scrupulous collaboration between the FSFE and ContributorAgreements.org.
|
|
|
We are pleased to see that collaboration to bear fruits in the shape of
|
|
|
the FLA-2.0. We hope that the new FLA will provide developers and Free
|
|
|
Software projects with more clarity, while retaining the spirit of the
|
|
|
original version.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>says Polina Malaja, the FSFE’s Legal Coordinator</p>
|
|
|
</blockquote>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<blockquote>
|
|
|
<p>We are thrilled to partner with FSFE and to see the new
|
|
|
FLA-2.0 go live hand in hand with a new version of our set of standardised
|
|
|
contributor agreements. FSFE's passion and especially Matija Šuklje's
|
|
|
dedication to modernising the FLA has enabled us to further revise and
|
|
|
refine our agreement chooser and we are especially delighted to offer
|
|
|
the new FLA-2.0 as one possible agreement to be chosen out different
|
|
|
options available at <a href="www.contributoragreements.org">contributoragreements.org</a>
|
|
|
</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>says Catharina Maracke, Team Lead at ContributorAgreements.org</p>
|
|
|
</blockquote>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<blockquote>
|
|
|
<p>KDE e.V. is the biggest user of the FLA and we are delighted
|
|
|
to see this new version released. As a global project we especially appreciate
|
|
|
the effort to make it applicable to more jurisdictions and easier to
|
|
|
understand for our contributors.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>says Lydia Pintscher, President of KDE e.V.</p>
|
|
|
</blockquote>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
</body>
|
|
|
<tags>
|
|
|
<tag key="front-page"/>
|
|
|
<tag key="fla">FLA</tag>
|
|
|
<tag key="legal">Legal</tag>
|
|
|
<tag key="licensing">Licensing</tag>
|
|
|
</tags>
|
|
|
</html>
|