140 lines
5.4 KiB
HTML
140 lines
5.4 KiB
HTML
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
|
||
|
||
<html newsdate="2012-06-27">
|
||
<version>1</version>
|
||
|
||
<head>
|
||
<title>Record fine against Microsoft upheld by European Court of Justice</title>
|
||
</head>
|
||
<body>
|
||
<h1>Record fine against Microsoft upheld by European Court of Justice</h1>
|
||
|
||
<p>
|
||
The European Court of Justice has ordered Microsoft to finally pay a record
|
||
fine for using its near-monopoly position on the desktop to keep rivals out of the
|
||
workgroup server market. Four years ago, the European Commission slapped
|
||
the software giant with a fine of 899 million Euros for its anticompetitive
|
||
behaviour. In today's ruling, the ECJ ruled that this unprecedented fine
|
||
was largely justified.
|
||
</p>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<p>
|
||
For a decade, the Free Software Foundation Europe has <a
|
||
href="/activities/ms-vs-eu/ms-vs-eu.html">participated
|
||
in the case</a>, also on behalf of the Samba team, which provides a
|
||
Free Software workgroup server competing with Microsoft's proprietary
|
||
product.
|
||
</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>
|
||
"Microsoft remains a convicted monopolist, and was reduced to
|
||
negotiating the terms of its punishment," says Karsten Gerloff,
|
||
President of the Free Software Foundation Europe. "The court has
|
||
reduced the fine by less than five percent. The European Commission
|
||
was right in being tough on Microsoft. We have worked hard to support
|
||
the Commission in this case, and are extremely proud of the victory
|
||
we've achieved. We are grateful for the Samba team and all the others
|
||
who invested so much effort along with us, and hope that the
|
||
Commission will continue to push for an open, competitive IT market."
|
||
</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>
|
||
The case shows that Microsoft has used patents as an excuse to not
|
||
reveal their mundane changes to public protocols. The court recognised
|
||
that the company was wrong to refuse to give access to the
|
||
interoperability information unless a party took a license for patents
|
||
too. This is an example of how software patents are a real and present
|
||
damage to competition even if used out of court.
|
||
</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>
|
||
"We have successfully asserted the rights of Free Software developers
|
||
like the Samba Team to access interoperability information, but
|
||
Microsoft refused our legitimate demands until the very end," says
|
||
Carlo Piana, General Counsel for the Free Software Foundation
|
||
Europe. "Today's decision establishes that we were right once
|
||
again. Receiving the interoperability information was our right, not a
|
||
concession by Microsoft."
|
||
</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>
|
||
The threat to competition has not disappeared. Microsoft still attempts
|
||
to bring increasing parts of the technology market under its control,
|
||
and other companies such as Apple are following its lead. The company
|
||
still uses patents to <a
|
||
href="/activities/swpat/letter-20101222.html">put
|
||
rivals under pressure and profit from their work</a>. It also uses new
|
||
approaches to <a
|
||
href="/freesoftware/secure-boot.html">restrict
|
||
device owners from installing software of their choice</a> on their
|
||
hardware. To counter these threats the Free Software Foundation Europe
|
||
will continue to work for a free information society, and for the
|
||
interests of Free Software users and developers everywhere.
|
||
</p>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<h2>Background</h2>
|
||
|
||
<p>
|
||
After the 2004 decision of the European Commission was upheld by the
|
||
General Court of the European Court of Justice, in 2007 Microsoft
|
||
finally complied fully with the provision to release timely and
|
||
accurate interoperability informations with competitors under
|
||
so-called "Reasonable And Non Discriminatory (RAND)" conditions.
|
||
</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>
|
||
After Microsoft did not fulfil the Commission's requirements, the
|
||
Commission finally set the fine for noncompliance to EUR 899
|
||
million, assessing that up and until October 2007 Microsoft fell
|
||
short of its obligations to offer RAND conditions.
|
||
</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>
|
||
Microsoft contested this assessment and appealed to the European Court
|
||
of Justice. The company claimed that because the information contained
|
||
in the release of the information was covered by patents – and thus innovative – it was
|
||
entitled to charge rivals substantial amount of money for access to
|
||
this information. Not having received sufficient guidance, it was
|
||
within its rights to set a high price for interoperability information,
|
||
and in good faith charge running royalties even for the "trade
|
||
secret" part, which was from the license for patents upon
|
||
express request from the Commission.
|
||
</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>
|
||
FSFE and the Samba Team (which is a licensee of the interoperability
|
||
information, or "WSPP", through the Protocol Freedom Information
|
||
Foundation) intervened in the case to deny that the information was
|
||
"innovative". The only value attached to the information was to allow
|
||
a drop-in replacement of network services to be created through the
|
||
discovery of trivial details of the protocols. Whereas the general
|
||
concepts, structure and engineering decisions were both well
|
||
understood and not ground-breaking if taken individually, nor was the
|
||
idea of combining them new or innovative. The Court
|
||
upheld the finding of the Commission, finding that: "Microsoft in
|
||
practice continued to refuse Free Software developers all access to
|
||
the interoperability information, which was not something that the
|
||
letter recognised it could legitimately do."
|
||
</p>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<h3>Contact</h3>
|
||
|
||
Karsten Gerloff<br/>
|
||
President<br/>
|
||
gerloff@fsfe.org<br/>
|
||
+49 176 9690 4298
|
||
|
||
<p>If you wish to receive further updates, subscribe to our press release mailing list at <a href="/press">https://fsfe.org/press</a>.</p>
|
||
</body>
|
||
<tags>
|
||
<tag key="front-page"/>
|
||
<tag key="microsoft"/>
|
||
<tag key="european-court-justice"/>
|
||
<tag key="legal"/>
|
||
<tag key="antitrust"/>
|
||
</tags>
|
||
</html>
|