64 lines
3.1 KiB
HTML
64 lines
3.1 KiB
HTML
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
|
|
|
|
<html newsdate="2016-06-24">
|
|
<version>1</version>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<head>
|
|
<title>FSFE's answers to the European Commission's Public Consultation:
|
|
Revision of the European Interoperability Framework</title>
|
|
</head>
|
|
<body>
|
|
|
|
<h1>FSFE's answers to the European Commission's Public Consultation:
|
|
Revision of the European Interoperability Framework</h1>
|
|
|
|
<p>The European Commission is
|
|
<a href="http://ec.europa.eu/isa/consultations/impact-assessment-for-the-revision-of-the-eis-eifl_en.htm">asking
|
|
for public input with regard to its plans to renew the European
|
|
Interoperability Framework</a> (EIF). The EIF aims to promote enhanced
|
|
interoperability in the EU public sector. The document, originally intended
|
|
as a set of non-binding guidelines for the EU public administration, is
|
|
going through its third revision since its initial adoption in 2004. The
|
|
FSFE has prepared its <a href="/freesoftware/standards/eif-v3.en.html">comments
|
|
for the draft of the revised guidelines</a>.</p>
|
|
|
|
<p>The FSFE sees some improvement compared to
|
|
<a href="/news/2010/news-20101216-01.en.html">the previous
|
|
revision</a>, in particular concerning the preferred use of Open Standards (called
|
|
"open specifications" in the draft revision) in European public services.</p>
|
|
|
|
<p>However, we need to address several shortcomings. The statement that
|
|
FRAND (allegedly "fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory") licensing terms
|
|
for standards "will foster competition" (according to the Commission) is
|
|
just plain wrong. FRAND licenses are highly anti-competitive in nature
|
|
and it is a well-established fact that
|
|
<a href="/freesoftware/standards/why-frand-is-bad-for-free-software.en.html">they
|
|
make it impossible for a standard to be implemented in Free Software</a>.</p>
|
|
|
|
<p>The draft also ignores the proven relationship between interoperability
|
|
and Free Software. Most, if not all, national interoperability frameworks
|
|
across Europe have based their success on substantial adoptions of Free
|
|
Software and Open Standards in public services. So much so it is to all
|
|
effects impossible to implement an interoperability framework without Free
|
|
Software. For more information, please see
|
|
<strong><a href="/freesoftware/standards/eif-v3.en.html">our full comments on the revision of the EIF</a></strong>.</p>
|
|
|
|
<p>The FSFE encourages you to <a href="http://ec.europa.eu/isa/consultations/impact-assessment-for-the-revision-of-the-eis-eifl_en.htm">provide
|
|
your own input to the ongoing consultation</a>. Replies can be submitted
|
|
by individuals, companies, academic institutions, and public administrations
|
|
before <strong>29 June</strong>. Feel free to reuse the arguments laid out
|
|
above for your own submission and tell the Commission how Free Software
|
|
and Open Standards are quintessential for interoperability.</p>
|
|
|
|
</body>
|
|
<tags>
|
|
<tag key="front-page"/>
|
|
<tag key="eif"/>
|
|
<tag key="openstandards">Open Standards</tag>
|
|
<tag key="policy">Policy</tag>
|
|
<tag key="europeancommission">European Commission</tag>
|
|
<tag key="digitalsinglemarket">Digital Single Market</tag>
|
|
</tags>
|
|
</html>
|