113 lines
5.3 KiB
HTML
113 lines
5.3 KiB
HTML
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
|
||
<html newsdate="2019-05-20">
|
||
<head>
|
||
<title>Three conclusions to draw from Google denying Huawei access to software</title>
|
||
<meta name="image" content="https://fsfe.org/picturebase/campaigns/pmpc/201902-pmpc-security-blackbox.jpg" />
|
||
</head>
|
||
<body>
|
||
|
||
<h1>
|
||
Three conclusions to draw from Google denying Huawei access to software
|
||
</h1>
|
||
|
||
<p newsteaser="yes">Google denies the Chinese IT giant Huawei access to
|
||
Google's proprietary components of the Android mobile operating system
|
||
which threatens IT security. This highlights the importance Free
|
||
Software has for technology users, public bodies, and businesses. The
|
||
Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) presents three essential lessons
|
||
from this case.</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>Following the U.S. administration's decision to effectively ban
|
||
American companies from trading with with the Chinese company Huawei,
|
||
Google suspended all business with the company. This affects all
|
||
software which is not covered under Free Software licences. In
|
||
practice, Huawei's upcoming and potentially also current phones will no
|
||
longer get support and updates for the Android operating system. They
|
||
will also not have access to the proprietary Google apps and services
|
||
like Gmail and Google Play. Although proprietary software should be
|
||
avoided in the first place, especially the latter will put future
|
||
Huawei users at risk because without access to the default app store on
|
||
most stock Android phones they will miss important security updates for
|
||
the apps installed through it.</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>Google offers only a base version of Android under a Free Software
|
||
licence but bundles it together with proprietary apps and services. The
|
||
non-free components of most stock Android devices have numerous
|
||
downsides for users, as the <a href="https://freeyourandroid.org">FSFE
|
||
has documented since 2012</a>. Now, the current case demonstrates that
|
||
even tech giants like Huawei face similar dependencies and vendor
|
||
lock-in effects as those of any individual users if they rely on proprietary
|
||
software.</p>
|
||
|
||
<h2>Three Conclusions</h2>
|
||
|
||
<p>The following lessons can be drawn from this case:</p>
|
||
|
||
<ol>
|
||
<li>The FSFE urges <strong>users</strong> to use Free Software
|
||
operating systems and applications on their computing devices. With
|
||
proprietary software, they are on the receiving end only and vendors
|
||
may deny them access to crucial security updates if the vendor or a
|
||
government changes its strategy. Free Software enables control of
|
||
technology, and the more important that technology becomes in our
|
||
daily lives, the more relevant Free Software becomes for users. For
|
||
Android, the FSFE helps users to regain more control with its <a
|
||
href="https://freeyourandroid.org">Free Your Android
|
||
initiative</a>.</li>
|
||
<br />
|
||
<li><strong>Governments and especially the European Union</strong>
|
||
should invest more resources in Free Software to gain independence
|
||
from large enterprises and other states. The current case highlights
|
||
the lack of influence the EU has on outside technology providers.
|
||
Instead of waiting for a future European IT monopolist to enter the
|
||
stage, the EU and its members states should <a
|
||
href="https://publiccode.eu">invest in Free Software development</a>
|
||
and focus on supporting local Free Software organisations as well as
|
||
businesses. This would effectively foster the inner-European market
|
||
and enable independence for European citizens and the EU economy.
|
||
This step is essential for avoiding exposing European infrastructure
|
||
to shutdowns controlled by external factors.</li>
|
||
<br />
|
||
<li>The FSFE urges <strong>companies</strong> to use as much Free
|
||
Software as possible in their supply chains. Proprietary software
|
||
makes a company dependent on its vendor and that vendor's government.
|
||
The current case shows that the US was able to force Google to stop
|
||
delivery of its proprietary products – but could not stop delivery of
|
||
the Free Software components of Android. Had Huawei invested more
|
||
resources in Free Software apps and services, the US strategy would
|
||
not have hit them as hard. Although the current events are linked to
|
||
the scrutiny the Chinese company is under right now, it is obvious
|
||
that this could happen to any other company based in any other
|
||
country as well.</li>
|
||
</ol>
|
||
|
||
<p>The earlier allegations against Huawei already showed that <a
|
||
href="/news/2019/news-20190205-01.html">code for all critical
|
||
infrastructure should be published under a Free Software licence</a>.
|
||
The latest episode of the Huawei affair illustrates that the same
|
||
applies to apps and services. Just days before the European Elections,
|
||
this should be a wake-up call for the next constituent Parliament to
|
||
ask the European Commission for European directives that foster
|
||
independence of European technical infrastructure and that build on
|
||
Free Software, starting with the <a href="https://publiccode.eu">demand
|
||
to release publicly funded software as public code</a>.</p>
|
||
|
||
</body>
|
||
|
||
<tags>
|
||
<tag>front-page</tag>
|
||
<tag content="IT Security">security</tag>
|
||
<tag content="Public Code">pmpc</tag>
|
||
<tag content="Huawei">huawei</tag>
|
||
<tag content="Free Your Androud">fya</tag>
|
||
</tags>
|
||
|
||
<discussion href="https://community.fsfe.org/t/three-conclusions-to-draw-from-google-denying-huawei-access-to-software/278" />
|
||
|
||
</html>
|
||
<!--
|
||
Local Variables: ***
|
||
mode: xml ***
|
||
End: ***
|
||
-->
|