Source files of,,,,, and Contribute:
You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.

nl-201012.en.xhtml 10KB

  1. <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
  2. <html newsdate="2010-12-04" type="newsletter">
  3. <head>
  4. <title>FSFE Newsletter - December 2010</title>
  5. </head>
  6. <body>
  7. <h1>FSFE Newsletter - December 2010</h1>
  8. <p newsteaser="yes">This edition covers the current developments in Open Standards policy, some
  9. basic information about software patents, an update from FSCONS about
  10. distributed computing, and how you can support us in the end of the year. </p>
  11. <p>This month was the first time in FSFE's history that we had a booth at three
  12. conferences at the same date: the <a href="">Brandenburger Linux Infotag (BLIT)</a> in Potsdam/Germany, the <a href="">Free Society Conference and Nordic
  13. Summit (FSCONS</a> in Göteburg/Sweden, and <a href="">T-DOSE</a> Eindhoven/The Netherlands. Our <a href="/campaigns/pdfreaders/pdfreaders.html">PDFreaders</a> campaign is quite
  14. successful: 31 public administrations already removed advertisements for
  15. non-free PDF readers from their websites, 8 of them added links to
  16. FSFE's sysadmins <a href="">updated the Fellowship blog software</a>,
  17. and we gave several presentations to politicians, parties, the public
  18. administration, and the Berlin Debating Union. <a href="">This month Fellowship interview
  19. </a> is with Brian about free
  20. documentation, emacs org mode, and his understanding of software as a tool. And
  21. finally we would like to congratulate Bjarni Rúnar Einarsson, Free Software
  22. developer and community builder from Iceland, who has received the <a href="/news/2010/news-20101108-01.html">Nordic Free
  23. Software Award.</a></p>
  24. <h2> Open Standards: India - Europe 1:0 </h2>
  25. <p>This month <a href="">India's government announced its Open Standards policy</a>,
  26. which is a huge success for the Free Software movement. The advantages for Free
  27. Software in India were definitely worth the three-year struggle with the
  28. proprietary software companies. When reading the government's papers you
  29. will <a href="">recognise several points</a> that were
  30. included in <a href="/activities/os/def.html">our Open Standards definition</a>, especially the ones already
  31. covered in the <a href="/news/nl/nl-201010.html">October edition of the newsletter</a>: that patents on standards should
  32. be available on a royalty-free basis. This policy will foster innovation in
  33. India's IT market, it will lead to smaller costs for the public administration,
  34. and will enable programmers to be more innovative.</p>
  35. <p>The European Commission is also setting out to reform Europe's standardisation
  36. system. Standardisation in Europe is currently dominated by a small number of
  37. organisations, mainly big companies. At the same time, much innovation is
  38. done by small and medium-sized companies. Although numerous, they do
  39. not really have a voice in standardisation. When having the opportunity to
  40. participate they often struggle because of a lack of time, money or expertise.
  41. So while the Indian document <a href="">improved between revisions</a>, the <a href="/activities/os/eifv2.html">European Interoperability Framework
  42. (EIF) has only got worse </a>. But with
  43. your ongoing support we can <a href="/activities/os/os.html">continue to explain the importance of Open
  44. Standards </a> to the European
  45. Commission and the member states, so they can provide us the same advantages as
  46. the Indian government. This month by participating at an joint <a href="">event from the
  47. European Commission and the European Patent Office</a>.</p>
  48. <h2> Software patents: Not another monopoly on software </h2>
  49. <p>Another topic we highlighted at the meeting from the European Commission and
  50. <a href="">in a radio interview (in German)</a> were
  51. software patents. </p>
  52. <p>To begin with, a patent is a monopoly on an idea, whereas copyright is a
  53. monopoly on a concrete implementation. While Bach's II symphony is covered by
  54. copyright, a patent would give a monopoly on the idea to combine bowed and wind
  55. instruments. Software falls under the copyright. This makes sense, with
  56. software you <a href="">have little research costs, but you have to spend a lot of time
  57. implementing </a> the ideas
  58. to make sure there are no security problems, and you can easily maintain and
  59. adapt it in future. The idea to combine bowed and wind instruments is not a big
  60. challenge, the challenge is how to combine them so it still sounds good in the
  61. end.</p>
  62. <p>More and more people understand that <a href="">software patents are a problem for
  63. everybody </a>, no matter if
  64. big or small companies, individual software developers, users, non-free or Free
  65. Software. </p>
  66. <ul><li>The companies have to spent more money for their legal department, to
  67. register patents, to negotiate patent crosslicensing, and to defend
  68. themselves against patent claims. While for some time software patents are a
  69. nice tool for big companies to prevent newcomers to compete with them, they
  70. also have to face companies who only sue others on software patents, and
  71. never do any software development by themselves. Against them, any software
  72. company can only loose.</li>
  73. <li>For software developers software patents mean legal uncertainty: whenever you
  74. start programming you might violate law. You will never be able to find out
  75. if you violate a patent. Even if you read a software patent you might not
  76. realise it covers what you are currently implementing. With patents, we have
  77. to pay money to register them. On the other hand with copyright, everybody of
  78. us even those who just program as a hobby can write a program, and afterwards
  79. this falls under copyright without any additional costs. In fact, software
  80. patents can dispossess us as they can prevent from using the rights we get
  81. from copyright, e.g. to distribute the program to others. </li>
  82. <li>Users would have to pay for all those costs. Some people estimate that the
  83. patent costs for smartphones are about 20% of the actual price payed by the
  84. customer. </li></ul>
  85. <p>We will continue to get rid of that problem. In the US our sister organisation
  86. is working to <a href="">build awareness to the harm caused by software patents</a> and in New Zealand the
  87. government understood the problem and <a href="">recommended in April to include computer
  88. programs amongst inventions that may not be patented</a>. In
  89. Europe the legislation has decided that software is not patentable. But laws
  90. are always interpreted by people, and in this case interpretations of the law
  91. differ. So the European Patents Office (EPO) grants software patents by
  92. declaring them as "computer implemented inventions". We will continue to work
  93. with our <a href="/about/fsfnetwork.html">sister organisations </a>,
  94. our <a href="">associated organisation FFII </a>, and others to inform
  95. people about the dangers of software patents. We will explain the legislative
  96. that they have to make the laws more precise so that the patent offices have to
  97. act as intended. </p>
  98. <h2> Distributed computing at FSCONS </h2>
  99. <p>We know that distributed computing is not a brand new topic. In fact there is a
  100. 7:21 minutes <a href="">commercial from 1959 about it</a>,
  101. and some of the ideas might still be relevant for the current "cloud computing"
  102. discussion.</p>
  103. <p>Our part here was to host a track a this year's FSCONS called <a href="">Divide and
  104. Reconquer </a>, which focused on the problem of the
  105. trend towards centralised non-free Internet services, and possible solutions.
  106. Thanks to <a href="">Sam's work </a> and our speakers, all
  107. five talks went well, each generating extensive discussion in the question and
  108. answer sessions. </p>
  109. <p>For example <a href="">this month Fellowship interviewee Brian Gough</a> even said to me after
  110. Michael Christen's demonstration of the peer to peer <a href="">search engine Yacy</a>, that by the end of next year he only wants to use
  111. distributed search engines for his web searches. Sounds like a good New Year's
  112. resolution. We will continue to work on this topic and animate more people to
  113. think about it, discuss it with others and work on solutions. </p>
  114. <h2> Get Active: Buy presents and donate - our support programs </h2>
  115. <p>End of the year often means buying presents and donating money. There are some
  116. ways to combine those two things, for example our
  117. <a href=""> support programs</a>. So if you or some of
  118. your friends already use Libri or Amazon to buy presents, please inform them
  119. about the possibility to support us. </p>
  120. <ul><li>If you buy books from <a href=""></a> we will receive
  121. around 5% of the sales as a donation.</li>
  122. <li>If you have installed <a href="">our plugin </a>
  123. around 5% of your sale from amazon is donated to FSFE. </li></ul>
  124. <p>You can <a href="">read Maëlle's blog post </a> to find
  125. out how much was donated through those ways. If you buy your books and other
  126. presents from other shops, you can of course support FSFE through a <a href="/donate/donate.html">one time
  127. donation </a> or on a regular basis by
  128. <a href="">becoming a Fellow of FSFE </a>. </p>
  129. <p>Best Regards,<br/>
  130. <a href="/about/kirschner">Matthias Kirschner </a> - <a href="">FSFE</a></p>
  131. <p>-- <br />
  132. <a href="/index.html">Free Software Foundation Europe</a><br />
  133. <a href="/news/news.rss">FSFE News</a><br />
  134. <a href="/events/events.rss">Upcoming FSFE Events</a><br />
  135. <a href="">Fellowship Blog Aggregation</a><br />
  136. <a href="/contact/community.html">Free Software Discussions</a> </p>
  137. </body>
  138. <tags>
  139. <tag>newsletter</tag>
  140. <tag>Matthias Kirschner</tag>
  141. </tags>
  142. <timestamp>$Date: 2010-12-01 17:21:04 +0200 (mer. 01 sept. 2010) $ $Author: mk $</timestamp>
  143. </html>
  144. <!--
  145. Local Variables: ***
  146. mode: xml ***
  147. End: ***
  148. -->