Source files of,,,,, and Contribute:
You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.

nl-201010.en.xhtml 7.9KB

  1. <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
  2. <html newsdate="2010-10-04" type="newsletter">
  3. <head>
  4. <title>FSFE Newsletter - October 2010</title>
  5. </head>
  6. <body>
  7. <h1>FSFE Newsletter - October 2010</h1>
  8. <p newsteaser="yes">In this edition we discuss the misleading term "fair, reasonable
  9. and non-discriminatory terms" (FRAND), we explain what we are doing about centralised
  10. computer systems and the Internet Governance Forum (IGF), and update you on our
  11. current campaign to end non-free software commercials by public institutions.</p>
  12. <p>FSFE celebrated Software Freedom Day with a variety of local events and activities. We
  13. organised talks and booths in Berlin, Bonn, Hamburg, Cologne, Offenburg (Germany), Zurich (Switzerland),
  14. and The Hague (Netherlands). <a
  15. href="/events/SFD-2010.html">With our activities</a> we
  16. reached new audiences, and explained to them why Free Software will become as
  17. important as freedom of the press and freedom of assembly.</p>
  18. <h2>Why FRAND excludes Free Software</h2>
  19. <p><a href="/news/2010/news-20100907-01.html">We asked
  20. European Free Software businesses</a> to participate in a survey of business
  21. attitudes towards the acceptability of including patents in industry standards.
  22. A major theme in the survey was whether patents that cover standards should be
  23. licensed royalty-free (as W3C recommends), or whether they should
  24. instead be licensed under so-called "fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory
  25. terms" (FRAND). </p>
  26. <p>FRAND is a misnomer as the terms are often unfair, unreasonable, and highly
  27. discriminatory, particularly for Free Software. In reality FRAND is only fair
  28. and reasonable to a small circle of the most powerful software companies.</p>
  29. <p>Paying royalties of 0.000001 Cent per copy to implement a standard might look
  30. fair at the first sight, but such a fee would make it impossible to distribute
  31. a program as Free Software. Free Software safeguards the right to share with
  32. others. Therefore,Ya when Free Software companies sell their software they cannot know how
  33. many people will eventually end up using it. It becomes impossible to estimate the
  34. total amount of royalties owed to patent owners; Free
  35. Software businesses will be unable to compete with their proprietary competitors
  36. and Free Software as a whole would be undermined.</p>
  37. <p>We encouraged Free Software companies to respond to this survey, so that their
  38. views were heard and the interests of Free Software were represented in the study's
  39. results. Unfortunately the
  40. implicit assumptions of the survey were biased towards large corporations with
  41. dedicated 'standardisation employees' dedicated to providing detailed information.
  42. We received feedback that it was very
  43. difficult and sometimes impossible for small and medium sized companies to
  44. fill out the questionnaire. We will highlight this fact as well as our general
  45. criticism in the forthcoming process, <a
  46. href="/activities/os/ps.html">as we have done in the
  47. past</a>.</p>
  48. <h2>Cloudy Internet Governance Forum</h2>
  49. <p>The Internet Governance Forum (IGF) is a global policy discussion forum of the
  50. United Nations, established as an outcome of the UN World Summit on the
  51. Information Society (WSIS). We are constantly following the IGF to ensure that
  52. policy discussions will not endanger digital freedom in general and Free
  53. Software in particular. Karsten attended the Forum in Vilnius,
  54. Lithuania and presented his talk <a href="">"Data in the
  55. cloud: Where do Open Standards fit in"</a>.</p>
  56. <p>He drew attention to potential solutions to the threats of cloud computing,
  57. including the possibility of users operating their own easy to
  58. administer, always connected servers, which could offer preconfigured web, mail, jabber, and microblogging services. He also discussed YaCy, GNU Social, Angel Applications and other Free
  59. Software programs which present decentralised alternatives to dominant proprietary services.</p>
  60. <p>We are currently working on ways to encourage wider use of applications which
  61. use distributed models, so that control of the software is also distributed
  62. amongst users. As a result we have integrated <a href="">Yacy, the
  63. distributed search engine </a> into our website and are now testing its results.
  64. YaCy's lead developer Michael Christen will be speaking at our track of talks <a
  65. href="/events/fscons-2010.html">'Divide and Reconquer: regaining control of our communications'</a> at FSCONS, which focuses on issues of centralisation of key Internet services.</p>
  66. <h2>Non-free software commercials presented by public institutions</h2>
  67. <p>Each day public institutions advertise non-free software on their websites.
  68. They link to non-free software PDF readers and thereby recommend that their visitors
  69. use non-free software. <a
  70. href="/freesoftware/society/democracy.html">Non-free
  71. software harms our society</a>, and it is particularly inappropriate for public institutions to unnecessarily endorse it. Some public institutions go as far as stating that it is only possible to view their PDF files with the proprietary reader that they recommend, which is simply false. Many <a
  72. href="">Free Software PDF readers</a> exist and provide users with a clear choice over which reader they wish to use.</p>
  73. <p>To raise awareness of this behaviour we started a new PDF readers campaign, and began collecting reports of infringing institutions, and petition signatures agreeing that this practice should be changed. </p>
  74. <p>Adverts for gratis non-free PDF readers readers are nonetheless adverts for non-free software, and because of this we do not include them on Public websites should not list them either as promoting one proprietary reader over another reader gives an unfair advantage, and supports the existence of software monopolies.</p>
  75. <p>Since 13 September, volunteers from all over the world helped us with the
  76. campaign. At the time of writing they submitted over 1369 occurences of
  77. advertisement for 39 countries. 762 individuals, 20 organisations and 21
  78. businesses signed the "Petition For The Removal Of Proprietary Software
  79. Advertising On Public Websites". Amazingly the campaign website is
  80. available in 10, the petition page in 11, and in 18 languages.</p>
  81. <h2>Get active</h2>
  82. <p>This month we ask you to support our PDFreaders campaign:</p>
  83. <ul><li>Find and <a
  84. href="/campaigns/pdfreaders/pdfreaders.html">report
  85. advertisements for non-free software</a> on websites belonging to public institutions.</li>
  86. <li>Sign our <a href="/campaigns/pdfreaders/petition.html">Petition For The Removal Of Proprietary Software Advertising On Public Websites</a>. </li>
  87. <li><a
  88. href="/contribute/translators/translators.html">Translate
  89. the websites about this campaign into your language</a>.</li>
  90. <li>Find out if it is <a href="">illegal for the public institutions to give unfair advertising to particular companies in your country</a> and inform us about it.</li>
  91. <li>Find out and inform us how much money it would cost in your country to get an
  92. online advertisement on websites comparable to the public institutions which
  93. contain the advertisement.</li>
  94. <li>Inform others about the campaign and what they can do to help.</li></ul>
  95. <p>Regards,<br /> <a href="/about/kirschner/kirschner.html">Matthias
  96. Kirschner</a>- FSFE</p>
  97. <p>-- <br />
  98. <a href="/index.html">Free Software Foundation Europe</a><br />
  99. <a href="/news/news.rss">FSFE News</a><br />
  100. <a href="/events/events.rss">Upcoming FSFE Events</a><br />
  101. <a href="">Fellowship Blog Aggregation</a><br />
  102. <a href="/contact/community.html">Free Software Discussions</a> </p>
  103. </body>
  104. <tags>
  105. <tag>newsletter</tag>
  106. <tag>Matthias Kirschner</tag>
  107. <tag>FRAND</tag>
  108. <tag>IGF</tag>
  109. <tag>pdfreaders</tag>
  110. <tag>Campaigns</tag>
  111. <tag>PDFreaders</tag>
  112. </tags>
  113. <timestamp>$Date: 2010-09-01 17:21:04 +0200 (mer. 01 sept. 2010) $ $Author: mk $</timestamp>
  114. </html>
  115. <!--
  116. Local Variables: ***
  117. mode: xml ***
  118. End: ***
  119. -->