Source files of fsfe.org, pdfreaders.org, freeyourandroid.org, ilovefs.org, drm.info, and test.fsfe.org. Contribute: https://fsfe.org/contribute/web/
https://fsfe.org
You can not select more than 25 topics
Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
113 lines
4.7 KiB
113 lines
4.7 KiB
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> |
|
<html newsdate="2021-12-16"> |
|
<version>1</version> |
|
|
|
<head> |
|
<title>Lack of public code cost the city of Stockholm €100 million</title> |
|
</head> |
|
|
|
<body> |
|
|
|
<h1>Lack of public code cost the city of Stockholm €100 million</h1> |
|
|
|
<p> |
|
<i>Öppna skolplattformen</i> was developed out of the frustration of some parents |
|
in Stockholm when they noticed some irregularities and security issues in the |
|
proprietary school platform provided by the city. The original app cost the |
|
city one billion Swedish krona (around €100 million) and it turned out to be |
|
badly flawed. |
|
</p> |
|
|
|
<figure> |
|
<img src="https://pics.fsfe.org/uploads/big/089c7baba968418669601f56d1f72d86.png" alt="PMPC"/> |
|
</figure> |
|
|
|
<p> |
|
Administrations are relying more and more on digital solutions to improve their |
|
workflows and to make daily processes easier. This was exactly the case of the |
|
city of Stockholm and its original <i>Skolplattformen</i>. This platform was meant to |
|
be used as a common digital platform for Stockholm's kindergartens and schools, |
|
by giving parents information about their children's school directly to their |
|
devices. However, the platform did not work as expected, and once some parents |
|
took a closer look at the software, they found numerous flaws in the app. |
|
</p> |
|
|
|
|
|
<p> |
|
This frustrating situation made them decide to reverse-engineer the platform's |
|
API to create a Free Software alternative - <a href="https://github.com/kolplattformen/skolplattformen">Öppna skolplattformen</a> - |
|
that offers a simpler, faster, and more secure experience. Despite these efforts, |
|
the city of Stockholm was neither happy nor willing to collaborate with the |
|
team of <i>Öppna skolplattformen</i>, and instead decided to start a legal investigation |
|
and fill out a police report against the developers of the app arguing misuse |
|
of personal data. |
|
</p> |
|
|
|
<blockquote> |
|
<p>"If we could use openness as our competitive advantage and do much better collaboration with each other, we could start seeing a lot of potential for Europe to be more competitive in terms of global economy." |
|
<cite>Christian Landberg, co-founder and developer of Öppna skolplattformen </cite> |
|
</p> |
|
</blockquote> |
|
|
|
|
|
<p> |
|
This is the story of a struggle of some parents trying to fix the problems |
|
that pricey proprietary software brought, and a skeptical administration that |
|
found itself trapped in a serious vendor lock-in. With Christian |
|
Landberg - co-founder and developer of <i>Öppna skolplattformen</i> - and Alexander |
|
Crawford - early supporter and strategic, policy and communication advisor of |
|
<i>Öppna skolplattformen</i> - we talked in depth about the Open School Platform. |
|
What drove them to release it under a Free Software license, its progress and |
|
current situation, and what lies ahead for this platform, but also for the use |
|
of public code in the public sector? |
|
</p> |
|
|
|
<video preload="none" controls="controls" width="100%"> |
|
<source src="https://download.fsfe.org/videos/pmpc/OpenSchoolPlatform.mp4" |
|
type='video/mp4; codecs="avc1.42E01E, mp4a.40.2"' /> |
|
</video> |
|
|
|
<p>Video (in English)</p> |
|
|
|
|
|
<blockquote> |
|
<p><i>"Öppna skolplattformen</i> is becoming a snowball that has escalated and it's changing the conversation around civic tech and digitalisation of public sector." |
|
<cite>Alexander Crawford, early supporter and advisor of Öppna skolplattformen</cite> |
|
</p> |
|
</blockquote> |
|
|
|
|
|
<h2>Public Money? Public Code!</h2> |
|
<p> |
|
Over the last four years, the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) has been |
|
advocating for more software freedom in the public sector in the framework of |
|
the Public Money? Public Code! initiative. It requires that publicly financed |
|
software developed for the public sector should be made publicly available under |
|
Free Software licenses. The arguments for this demand are based on the benefits |
|
that Free Software can foster, such as saving long-term costs, promotion and |
|
support of the local economy, transparency, interoperability, and more. |
|
</p> |
|
|
|
<p> |
|
|
|
You can support this call by <a href="https://publiccode.eu/">joining our |
|
campaign</a>, <a href="/activities/publiccode/brochure">distributing our brochure</a>, and convincing <a href="https://wiki.fsfe.org/Activities/ContactingAdministrationsForPMPC">your local administration</a> to use Free Software. |
|
</p> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
</body> |
|
|
|
<tags> |
|
<tag key="front-page"/> |
|
<tag key="pmpc">Public Money? Public Code!</tag> |
|
<tag key="procurement">Public procurement</tag> |
|
<tag key="public-administration">Public administration</tag> |
|
<tag key="education">Education</tag> |
|
</tags> |
|
|
|
|
|
<discussion href="https://community.fsfe.org/t/787"/> |
|
<image url="https://pics.fsfe.org/uploads/big/089c7baba968418669601f56d1f72d86.png" alt="PMPC"/> |
|
|
|
</html>
|
|
|