|
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
|
|
<html newsdate="2019-08-27">
|
|
<version>1</version>
|
|
|
|
<head>
|
|
<title>Radio Lockdown: Criticism of Controversial Directive Unlikely to Sway European Commission</title>
|
|
</head>
|
|
<body>
|
|
|
|
<h1>
|
|
Radio Lockdown: Criticism of Controversial Directive Unlikely to Sway European Commission
|
|
</h1>
|
|
|
|
<p>Since 2014, a European Directive has the effect of
|
|
hindering users to load software on their radio devices, devices such
|
|
as mobile phones, laptops and routers. While the European Commission
|
|
recently closed a feedback period, where citizens shared their
|
|
thoughts about the impact of the Directive, the FSFE worries that such
|
|
feedback could very well go unheeded. Learn more about the feedback
|
|
received, and what lies ahead.</p>
|
|
|
|
<p>In 2014, the European Parliament passed <a
|
|
href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX%3A32014L0053">the
|
|
Radio Equipment Directive (the “Directive”)</a>, which, among other
|
|
regulations, makes vendors of certain types of radio hardware
|
|
responsible for preventing users from installing software which may
|
|
alter such hardware’s radio parameters to break applicable radio
|
|
regulations. While the FSFE shares the Directive’s overall purpose to
|
|
keep radio frequencies clean, we have been working on this issue of <a
|
|
href="/activities/radiodirective/">Radio Lockdown</a>
|
|
for almost 4 years now, because the Directive's approach will have
|
|
negative implications on users’ rights and Free Software, fair
|
|
competition, innovation, and the environment – mostly without equal
|
|
benefits for security.</p>
|
|
|
|
<p>Specifically, Article 3(3)(i) of the Directive requires
|
|
manufacturers of certain types of radio devices to assess every
|
|
software regarding its compliance with existing national radio
|
|
regulations. The classes of devices that will be affected has yet to be
|
|
defined. Due to this, it will likely become impossible or very
|
|
difficult for users and companies to use alternative software on
|
|
devices they have bought – routers, mobile phones, WiFi-cards and the
|
|
laptops they are built in, or almost all Internet-of-Things devices in
|
|
the future.</p>
|
|
|
|
<blockquote><p>[R]adio equipment [shall support] certain features in
|
|
order to ensure that software can only be loaded into the radio
|
|
equipment where the compliance of the combination of the radio
|
|
equipment and software has been demonstrated.<br />
|
|
– <em>Radio Equipment Directive, Article 3(3)(i)</em></p></blockquote>
|
|
|
|
<p>The European Commission officially opened a online feedback period,
|
|
lasting from 28 January to 4 March 2019. Some <a
|
|
href="https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/initiatives/ares-2018-6621038/feedback_en?p_id=380919">276
|
|
comments were collected</a>, the overwhelming majority of which were
|
|
critical of the impact that Article 3(3)(i) would have. Most of the
|
|
commenters were individual private citizens, although academic and
|
|
research institutions, NGOs, and companies also provided feedback.</p>
|
|
|
|
<p>We were heartened to see that the comments largely reflected the
|
|
stance adopted by the FSFE. Many individuals shared their concerns that
|
|
Article 3(3)(i) would have a negative effect on the usage of Free
|
|
Software among individuals, public bodies, and companies, as it would
|
|
compel device manufacturers to assess every software for its compliance
|
|
with national radio regulations, thereby incentivising manufacturers to
|
|
ensure that their products come bundled only with their own
|
|
unmodifiable proprietary software. With Free Software being the only
|
|
feasible method by which users of technology can break out of planned
|
|
product obsolescence cycles, the feedback received reflected concerns
|
|
of restrictions on the freedom of use and right to repair of radio
|
|
devices.</p>
|
|
|
|
<p>Many commenters also expressed their dismay at the effect of the
|
|
Directive on competition and innovation. As a large amount of such
|
|
developments come from the Free Software community, compliance with
|
|
Article 3(3)(i) means a suppression of innovation and new technological
|
|
developments. If the software present in radio equipment is locked and
|
|
proprietary, this prevents the public at large from being able to learn
|
|
how the software in their devices work, and from making their own
|
|
potentially innovative and beneficial modifications.</p>
|
|
|
|
<p>We also saw that many people were concerned about the impact Article
|
|
3(3)(i) would have on security. As the safety of radio devices
|
|
deteriorate upon release, security issues can be more efficiently
|
|
addressed by Free Software improvements, than by waiting for
|
|
manufacturers to release updates on their own, often proprietary
|
|
software. Furthermore, old devices can become insecure when a
|
|
manufacturer no longer releases software updates to support them. This
|
|
caused concern that without being able to deploy their own updates
|
|
because of the application of Article 3(3)(i), a user would have to
|
|
choose between purchasing newer models, or living with potentially
|
|
insecure devices.</p>
|
|
|
|
<p>Despite the wealth of negative feedback received against Article
|
|
3(3)(i), a recent meeting of the Commission Expert Group on
|
|
Reconfigurable Radio Systems on 25 June 2019 attended by the FSFE
|
|
showed that the scope of the problem is likely not appreciated by the
|
|
European Commission. In fact, we are afraid that by the means of a <a
|
|
href="/activities/radiodirective/#devices">delegated act</a>, a much
|
|
broader regulation is being sought, while leading actors still do not
|
|
comprehend the role of software in a digital world and economy, let
|
|
alone the importance of Free Software and how its licences work.</p>
|
|
|
|
<p>The FSFE is working hard to help regulators understand the negative
|
|
influence their current approach will have. Our concerns regarding
|
|
Article 3(3)(i) are shared by more than 50 organisations and
|
|
businesses, which have signed our Joint Statement against Radio
|
|
Lockdown, a result of our ongoing exchange and cooperation with the
|
|
Free Software community in Europe and beyond. If your organisation
|
|
would like to get involved and sign the Joint Statement, please <a
|
|
href="/contact">get in touch with us</a>.</p>
|
|
|
|
<p>The European Commission is currently expected to open another public
|
|
consultation in the fourth quarter of 2019. You can see all the
|
|
responses to the European Commission’s online feedback round <a
|
|
href="https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/initiatives/ares-2018-6621038_en">here</a>.</p>
|
|
|
|
</body>
|
|
|
|
<tags>
|
|
<tag key="front-page"/>
|
|
<tag key="radiodirective">Radio Lockdown</tag>
|
|
<tag key="policy">Policy</tag>
|
|
<tag key="european-commission">European Commission</tag>
|
|
</tags>
|
|
|
|
<author id="ku" />
|
|
<author id="mehl" />
|
|
|
|
|
|
</html>
|
|
<!--
|
|
Local Variables: ***
|
|
mode: xml ***
|
|
End: ***
|
|
-->
|