Source files of,,,,, and Contribute:
You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.

111 lines
6.1 KiB

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<html newsdate="2017-02-17">
<title>European Commission responds to the FSFE's information request for Horizon 2020 </title>
<h1>European Commission responds to the FSFE's information request for Horizon 2020 </h1>
<p>The European Commission Directorate-General for Research
and Innovation responds to <a href="/news/2017/news-20170110-01.html">
a Freedom of Information (FOI) request about the use, development and
release of software under Horizon 2020</a> - submitted by the FSFE on
January 9, 2017.</p>
<p>With this FOI request, the FSFE directly aimed at shedding light on
how much money is spent on the use and purchase of proprietary software
licences through the Horizon 2020 funding for the beneficiary projects.
Respectively, it intended to figure if and what kind of data is collected,
apropos of Free Software licences. The FOI request followed the publication
of the FSFE's <a href="">
position paper for the endorsement of Free Software and Open Standards in
Horizon 2020 and all publicly-funded research</a>.</p>
<p>However, <a href="">
the response by the Commission</a> revealed that no information is being
collected on how the EU funds are being spent, when it comes to the
software used and developed by the beneficiary projects within Horizon
<p>"[...] we checked if the requested information existed and the competent
Commission services informed us that the European Commission does not
systematically collect information about open source software used or
developed under Horizon 2020 grants, as this is not a reporting requirement
in the Horizon 2020 legal basis. Consequently we are not in a position
to provide you the information that you are looking for. The same applies
to data concerning Horizon 2020 projects paying licence fees for software
or developing software on their own."</p>
<h2>Breaking down the EC's reply</h2>
<p>The EC is justifying the lack of information with the argument that
"it is not legally mandatory" to collect data concerning the use and
acquisition of software licences.</p>
<p>According to the Article 14(1) of the Regulation (EU) No 1291/2013
establishing Horizon 2020, particular attention in the framework shall
be paid to the development and application of key enabling and industrial
technologies as well as future and emerging technologies; and shall
contribute to the Digital Agenda for Europe initiative. Regarding this
particular point, <strong>the interim evaluation of Horizon 2020 shall assess
the efficiency and use of resources, with particular attention to cross-cutting
issues and other elements referred in the Article 14(1)</strong>. Software
is no doubt falling under all of the points that Horizon 2020 is supposed to
focus on when it comes to both industrial and emerging technologies, as
well as part of the Digital Agenda for Europe. The absence of monitoring
the use of resources Horizon 2020 projects are allocating to the use and
development of software in Research and Innovation will not allow
to assess the efficiency and use of resources of Horizon 2020 in its
Interim evaluation.</p>
<p>Indeed, in the <a href="">
first Annual Monitoring Report 2014</a> which focuses on the implementation
of the first year of the programme, information regarding the share of
EU financial contribution to the Information and Communication Technology
(ICT) Research and Innovation was missing. According to <a href="">
the second report for 2015</a>, however, preliminary data show that over one fifth
of the EU funding in Horizon 2020 contributes to ICT Research and Innovation. </p>
<h2>What "no information" means for Free Software and Open Science</h2>
<p>The absence of data about the use of software within Horizon 2020
beneficiary projects makes almost impossible the accurate estimation of
the amount of both proprietary and Free Software, being used or developed
under Horizon 2020 grants.</p>
<p>Taking into consideration the fact that nowadays, scientists irrespective
of their field of study depend on software in order to successfully conduct
their research, it is indisputable that almost every beneficiary project
spends a considerable amount of the hand-out grant in the purchase of
software licences. The fact that the EC does not collect data on the
spending of public money for software licences disregards an essential
part of the modern research.</p>
<p>Consequently, without relevant data, Horizon 2020 monitoring and evaluation
processes cannot draw safe conclusions. Critical factors, such as the
re-use of software being developed with Horizon 2020 funding, or the
costs for re-purchasing the same licences cannot be scrutinized and therefore,
cannot lead decision-makers to optimised funding solutions. Albeit, the most
significant complication is the fact that the EC is not in position to
prove with a degree of certainty that Open Access and subsequently
Open Science, two of the Horizon 2020 most fundamental principles, are
implemented in practice. As already argued in the FSFE's <a href="">
recent position paper</a>, Open Science can neither be achieved nor be
sustainable in long-term without Free Software being its chief constituent.</p>
<tag key="front-page"/>
<tag key="openstandards">Open Standards</tag>
<tag key="open-science">Open Science</tag>
<tag key="policy">policy</tag>
<tag key="european-commission">European Commission</tag>