Source files of fsfe.org, pdfreaders.org, freeyourandroid.org, ilovefs.org, drm.info, and test.fsfe.org. Contribute: https://fsfe.org/contribute/web/ https://fsfe.org
You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.

news-20151110-01.en.xhtml 2.3KB

1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647
  1. <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
  2. <html newsdate="2015-11-10">
  3. <head>
  4. <title>European Parliament pushes for Free Software</title>
  5. </head>
  6. <body class="press release">
  7. <h1>European Parliament pushes for Free Software migration</h1>
  8. <p newsteaser="yes">On 29 October 2015, the European Parliament<a href="http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+TA+P8-TA-2015-0388+0+DOC+PDF+V0//EN">
  9. adopted a report</a> (2015/2635(RSP)), which condemned mass surveillance throughout
  10. Europe. While focusing primarily on legal precedents of data protection,
  11. Parliament proposed new recommendations to improve IT security
  12. by migrating to free software, as well as adding free software as a
  13. mandatory selection criterion in public IT procurement.</p>
  14. <p>Specifically, Section 47 of the report:</p>
  15. <blockquote>Welcomes the steps taken so far to
  16. strengthen Parliament’s IT security, as outlined in the action plan on
  17. EP ICT Security prepared by DG ITEC; asks for these efforts to be continued
  18. and the recommendations made in the resolution fully and swiftly carried
  19. out; calls for fresh thinking and, if necessary, legislative change in
  20. the field of procurement to enhance the IT security of the EU institutions;
  21. <strong>calls for the systematic replacement of proprietary software by
  22. auditable and verifiable open-source software in all the EU institutions,
  23. for the introduction of a mandatory ’open-source’ selection criterion in
  24. all future ICT procurement procedures, and for efficient availability of
  25. encryption tools</strong>.</blockquote>
  26. <p>This is a welcome change in rhetoric
  27. <a href="http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&amp;language=EN&amp;reference=P7-TA-2014-0230">
  28. from the previous version of the resolution</a> (2013/2188(INI) Section 91).
  29. The new version uses stronger language to push for migrating to Free
  30. Software as a way to improve transparency and security in EU IT systems.
  31. Although resolutions passed in the European Parliament are non-binding,
  32. passage of this report sends a strong message to the European Commission
  33. to include provisions for Free Software in future legislation.</p>
  34. </body>
  35. <tags>
  36. <tag>front-page</tag>
  37. <tag content="European Parliament">EuropeanParliament</tag>
  38. <tag content="Policy">Policy</tag>
  39. </tags>
  40. </html>