35 lines
1.1 KiB
HTML
35 lines
1.1 KiB
HTML
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
|
|
<html newsdate="2014-05-27">
|
|
<version>1</version>
|
|
|
|
<head>
|
|
<title>[Blog] We're all Gmail users now: Privacy as an ecological issue</title>
|
|
</head>
|
|
<body>
|
|
|
|
<h1>[Blog] We're all Gmail users now: Privacy as an ecological issue</h1>
|
|
|
|
<p>Even if you're not using Google's
|
|
Gmail service yourself, many of your friends
|
|
will. How well can we really protect our privacy when
|
|
we opt out of centralised web services? </p>
|
|
|
|
<p>Based
|
|
on <a href="http://mako.cc/copyrighteous/google-has-most-of-my-email-because-it-has-all-of-yours">analysis
|
|
by Benjamin Mako Hill</a>, <a href="/about/people/gerloff/">Karsten</a> has
|
|
explored this question in a couple of blog posts in
|
|
<a href="https://blogs.fsfe.org/gerloff/2014/05/27/were-all-gmail-users-now-pt-2/">English</a>
|
|
and <a href="https://netzpolitik.org/2014/wir-sind-alle-gmail-nutzer-datenschutz-als-umweltproblem/">German</a>. The upshot: Privacy is an
|
|
ecological question, just like breathable air and
|
|
clean water.</p>
|
|
|
|
</body>
|
|
<sidebar>
|
|
</sidebar>
|
|
<tags>
|
|
<tag key="front-page"/>
|
|
<tag key="privacy"/>
|
|
|
|
</tags>
|
|
</html>
|