87 líneas
4.8 KiB
HTML
87 líneas
4.8 KiB
HTML
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
|
|
<html newsdate="2014-03-28">
|
|
<version>1</version>
|
|
|
|
<head>
|
|
<title>CCC and FSFE: German Federal Network Agency must improve</title>
|
|
</head>
|
|
<body>
|
|
<h1>CCC and FSFE: German Federal Network Agency must improve</h1>
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
After multiple public hearings and political debates, the German Federal Network Agency (BNetzA) presented a set
|
|
of <a href="/news/2014/files/140221-TKTransparenzV-Entwurf_PDF.pdf">proposed regulations (German)</a>
|
|
that would eliminate compulsory use of particular routers and improve the transparency of telecommunication
|
|
firms for customers. Compulsory routers tie customers to a device provided by the ISP. The Free Software Foundation
|
|
Europe (FSFE), <a href="http://www.ccc.de">Chaos Computer Club (CCC)</a>, and the project leadership of
|
|
<a href="http://www.ipfire.org">IPFire</a> and <a href="http://openwrt.org">OpenWrt</a>, as well as other experts,
|
|
reviewed these regulations and gave <a href="/news/2014/files/Stellungnahme-TKTransparenzV-FSFE.pdf">comments to
|
|
the BNetzA (German)</a></p>
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
The ideas of the BNetzA, responsible for maintaining and promoting competition in the network marketplace, are welcome
|
|
in principle. The ISP will need to collect fundamental information such as technical functions on a product datasheet,
|
|
and end users can request the login credentials for the device. This should eliminate the compulsory use of particular
|
|
routers.
|
|
</p>
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
It is not clear, however, why the BNetzA wants to leave the burden of requesting the access data on the user, instead of
|
|
recording this on the proposed data sheet. Even the grand coalition (a coalition between the political parties CDU/CSU and SPD)
|
|
<a href="/news/2013/news-20131211-01.html#1">has clearly demanded otherwise in its coalition agreement</a>. Then, the end
|
|
users would be in possession of the login credentials necesary to use an alternative router without explicitly asking.
|
|
</p>
|
|
|
|
<blockquote><p>
|
|
"If the burden to request this information is on the user, the BNetzA hardly has the ability to check the ISP's responsiveness
|
|
in providing it. Then delays could continue, supported by unrepresentative individual cases. The users would have even more
|
|
complications that before", says Matthias Kirschner, vice-president of the FSFE. "To that end, the login credentials for all
|
|
available services must be known to the customer, unrequested, from the beginning of the contract, as even the government coalition
|
|
demanded."</p></blockquote>
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
Thus, unambiguous phrases must be added so that ISPs cannot find any loopholes. For example, the protocols used by the device
|
|
must also be known for full interchangeability.
|
|
</p>
|
|
|
|
<blockquote><p>"Without requiring the ISP to provide the login credentials and to be transparent about services and protocols,
|
|
ISP routers would still be de facto compulsory. Murky phrases and the requirement of requesting the information would reduce
|
|
the customers to suppliants," says Frank Rieger, spokesperson for the CCC.</p></blockquote>
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
Even the definition of a network termination point is not well-defined, in spite of a hearing called for that purpose,
|
|
at which the FSFE made a statement.
|
|
</p>
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
Additionally in the testing process, which ISPs have to offer in the future, there is need for improvement. According to the BNetzA's plans, the mechanism and details of the testing only need to be shared with the authorities, and not with individual
|
|
customers. This artificially limits the intended transparency and prevents the process from being evaluated by users and
|
|
independent specialists.
|
|
</p>
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
The regulations can only fulfill their purpose if the BNetzA improves the evaluation method for compulsory routers and
|
|
transparency. Only then the demands of the coalition agreement will be met. Anything else would only open more
|
|
loopholes, through which customers could be further coerced and discriminated against.</p>
|
|
|
|
</body>
|
|
|
|
<sidebar>
|
|
<h2>More about Compulsory Routers</h2>
|
|
<ul>
|
|
<li><a href="/news/2014/files/Stellungnahme-TKTransparenzV-FSFE.pdf">Statement to the BNetzA, 27.03.2014 (German)</a></li>
|
|
<li><a href="/news/2013/news-20131104-02.html">"Compulsory Routers Hurt Users" (German)</a></li>
|
|
<li><a href="/news/2013/files/Stellungnahme_Schnittstellen_398_-_FSFE.pdf">Statement to the BNetzA, Fall 2013 (German)</a></li>
|
|
<li><a href="https://blogs.fsfe.org/mk/routerzwang-fsfes-schreiben-zur-konsultation-der-bundesnetzagentur/">Preliminary Notice of Consultation (German)</a></li>
|
|
<li><a href="https://blogs.fsfe.org/mk/status-of-compulsory-routers-in-germany/">Status of Compulsory Routers in Germany, Fall 2013</a></li>
|
|
<li><a href="http://blog.mehl.mx/2014/why-free-choice-of-routers-is-an-unnegotiable-must/">Why Free Choice of Routers is an unnegotiable must</a></li>
|
|
</ul>
|
|
</sidebar>
|
|
<tags>
|
|
<tag key="front-page"/>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<tag key="policy"/>
|
|
</tags>
|
|
</html>
|