Source files of fsfe.org, pdfreaders.org, freeyourandroid.org, ilovefs.org, drm.info, and test.fsfe.org. Contribute: https://fsfe.org/contribute/web/ https://fsfe.org
You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.

news-20111201-02.en.xhtml 3.1KB

1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859606162636465666768697071727374
  1. <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
  2. <!-- vim: set tw=80 formatoptions=tcqron ai: -->
  3. <html newsdate="2011-12-01">
  4. <head>
  5. <title>Verdict in the case of AVM vs. Cybits confirmed the view of FSFE</title>
  6. </head>
  7. <body>
  8. <h1>Verdict in the case of AVM vs. Cybits confirmed the view of FSFE</h1>
  9. <p newsteaser="yes"> In the dispute between the companies AVM and Cybits the <a
  10. href="/activities/ftf/lg-urteil-20111118.pdf">written reasoning for the decision
  11. of the Regional Court of Berlin (PDF, German)</a> is now available. The court
  12. confirmed FSFE's view that users of GNU GPLed software are allowed to modify
  13. and install it even if it is shipped as a part of an embedded device's
  14. firmware. </p>
  15. <p>The court has particularly denied that Cybits has infringed AVM's copyright
  16. by distributing its <q>Surf-Sitter DSL</q> software. According to the judge the
  17. AVM DSL router's firmware is a collective work. The GNU General Public License
  18. (GNU GPL) clearly states that the GPL parts contained in the firmware can be
  19. lawfully modified and reproduced. Thus it is acceptable that these parts are
  20. downloaded from AVM and edited during the installation of the Surf-Sitter
  21. software. </p>
  22. <p>The trademark claims were also rejected. The fact that in the router's
  23. interface the trademark <q>Fritz!Box</q> is still visible after the
  24. installation of Surf-Sitter does not constitute an infringement. </p>
  25. <p>It also unfolds from the reasoning that a modification of the GNU GPLed
  26. parts of the firmware does not trigger any competition claims. The Regional
  27. Court therefore confirms that it is in general permissible to modify firmware
  28. parts under the GNU GPL and to newly install these modified versions. </p>
  29. <p>The granting part of the verdict which parallels last year's judgment of the
  30. Superior Court of Justice is mainly based on the idea that the customers impute
  31. wrongly displayed information about the internet connection and the status of
  32. the parental control to AVM. Cybits must remove this misinformation if they
  33. wish to sell their product. In contrast, modifications of the firmware as such
  34. are allowed. </p>
  35. <p>The verdict is not yet final. The parties can still appeal the decision.
  36. </p>
  37. <ul>
  38. <li><a href="/activities/ftf/avm-gpl-violation.html">Detailed background
  39. information</a></li>
  40. <li>Previous news on this case:</li>
  41. <ul>
  42. <li>2011-06-20 - <a href="/news/2011/news-20110620-01.html">AVM violating
  43. license of the Linux kernel</a></li>
  44. <li>2011-06-22 - <a href="/news/2011/news-20110622-01.html">FSFE on AVM vs
  45. Cybits: A small computer is still a computer</a></li>
  46. </ul>
  47. <li><a href="https://lwn.net/Articles/465070/">LWN article: "ELCE11: Till Jaeger on AVM vs. Cybits"</a></li>
  48. <li>2011-11-10 - <a href="/news/2011/news-20111110-01.html">Court rejects
  49. AVM's claims opposing third party modifications of GPL software</a></li>
  50. </ul>
  51. </body>
  52. <tags>
  53. <tag>front-page</tag>
  54. <tag>gpl</tag>
  55. <tag>de</tag>
  56. <tag>AVM</tag><tag>Compliance</tag><tag>Ruling</tag><tag>de</tag>
  57. </tags>
  58. <translator>Martin Gollowitzer and Philipp Kammerer</translator>
  59. </html>
  60. <!--
  61. Local Variables: ***
  62. mode: xml ***
  63. End: ***
  64. -->