Source files of fsfe.org, pdfreaders.org, freeyourandroid.org, ilovefs.org, drm.info, and test.fsfe.org. Contribute: https://fsfe.org/contribute/web/ https://fsfe.org
You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.

news-20111117-01.en.xhtml 5.2KB

1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859606162636465666768697071727374757677787980818283848586878889909192
  1. <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
  2. <html newsdate="2011-11-17">
  3. <head>
  4. <title>Free Software Legal News</title>
  5. </head>
  6. <body>
  7. <h1>Free Software legal news</h1>
  8. <p newsteaser="yes">The patent litigation between Microsoft and Barnes &#38; Nobles is taking a new turn, with the revelation of Microsoft's patent strategies against Android: FUD, invalid patents, etc. according to Barnes &#38; Nobles. Also, new questions arise on exact scope of the copyrightability of software, with the litigation between Oracle and Google, again on Android, exploring new issues on linking, user-space and APIs specifications. </p>
  9. <h2>Software patents</h2>
  10. <p>Microsoft v. Barnes &#38; Noble: Trivial patents lawsuit?</p>
  11. <ul>
  12. <li><a href="http://groklaw.net/article.php?story=2011111122291296">Groklaw &#8211; Barnes &#38; Noble Exposes Microsoft&#8217;s &#8220;Trivial&#8221; Patents and Strategy Against Android ~pj Updated</a><br />
  13. <blockquote><p>
  14. Barnes &#38; Noble has done the world a tremendous favor, by pulling aside the curtain and revealing Microsoft&#8217;s patent campaign tactics against Android in lurid detail.</p>
  15. <p>It reveals the assertion of &#8220;trivial&#8221; and &#8220;invalid&#8221; patents against Barnes &#38; Noble and some shocking details […].</p></blockquote>
  16. </li>
  17. <li><a href="http://www.geekwire.com/2011/barnes-nobles-29page-slide-deck-calls-bs-microsofts-android-patent-campaign">Barnes &#38; Noble’s 29-page slide deck calls B.S. on Microsoft’s Android patent campaign &#8211; GeekWire</a><br />
  18. <blockquote><p>
  19. A 29-page slide deck &#8212; made public this week in Microsoft&#8217;s patent lawsuit against Barnes &#38; Noble &#8212; outlines, in great detail, the bookseller&#8217;s objections to the software company&#8217;s campaign to collect patent licensing fees from Android device &#8230;</p></blockquote>
  20. </li>
  21. </ul>
  22. <p>Patents in the multimedia realm have always been an issue; recently with the battle for HTML5 video codecs between H264, backed by Apple and Microsoft, against Theora and WebM backed by Google, Opera, Mozilla and others. A lot of media and PR from proprietary companies tried to discredit Free Software technologies by means of patent infringement threats. This article about the Xiph.org foundation shows what legal strategy can be pursued; and how much this draws back innovation.</p>
  23. <ul>
  24. <li><a href="http://lwn.net/Articles/465234/">Xiph.org&#8217;s &#8220;Monty&#8221; on codecs and patents [LWN.net]</a>
  25. <blockquote><p>
  26. One way to combat that is to document why the patents don&#8217;t apply. Basically, Xiph did enough research to show why the Qualcomm patents don&#8217;t apply to Opus and it is planning to release that information. It is a dangerous strategy at some level because it gives away some of the defense strategy, he said, but Xiph has to try something.</p></blockquote>
  27. </li>
  28. </ul>
  29. <h2>Software and copyrightability</h2>
  30. <ul>
  31. <li><a href="http://www.brownrudnick.com/blog/emergingtech/postIndv.asp?ID=132">Android’s Bionic Problem Is Not “Bogus”: Why Judge Alsup Got It Right And Linus Torvalds Got It Wrong</a>
  32. <blockquote><p>
  33. In September, federal judge William Alsup denied Google’s request for a ruling that the Java application programming interfaces (“APIs”) were, categorically, not protected under copyright law</p></blockquote>
  34. </li>
  35. <li><a href="http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20111105084812885">Groklaw &#8211; Oracle v. Google &#8211; How to Proceed on the Copyright Issue II</a><br />
  36. <blockquote><p>
  37. [Oracle] appears to be claiming that Google’s code is an infringing derivative work of Oracle’s specifications because the Android source code implements the APIs described by those specifications.</p></blockquote>
  38. </li>
  39. </ul>
  40. <h2>IT news of legal interest</h2>
  41. <p>A newcomer in the very competitive &#8220;App Store&#8221; landscape.</p><ul>
  42. <li><a href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/government/cloud-saas/231902249">NASA Plans Cloud Marketplace For Scientists &#8211; Government &#8211; Cloud/SaaS &#8211; Informationweek</a><br />
  43. <blockquote><p>
  44. &#8220;Cloud services suite to expand with platform as a service, data as a service, and a new cloud computing storefront likened to Apple&#8217;s AppStore and Google&#8217;s Android Market.</p></blockquote>
  45. </li>
  46. </ul>
  47. <h2>About the Free Software Legal News</h2>
  48. <h2 id="subpages">Navigation</h2>
  49. <ul>
  50. <li>
  51. <h3><a href="/news/legal-news.html">Legal News Archive</a></h3>
  52. <p>Links related to Free Software news are collected, edited and published weekly to help keep track of the important legal issues. We welcome submissions of links by email to legal-news at fsfeurope dot org</p>
  53. </li>
  54. <li>
  55. <h3><a href="/activities/ftf/ftf.html">FSFE Legal - The Freedom Task Force</a></h3>
  56. <p>
  57. FSFE is committed to helping individuals, projects, businesses and government agencies find Free Software legal information, experts and support. Our mission is to spread knowledge, solve problems and encourage the long-term growth of Free Software.
  58. </p>
  59. </li>
  60. </ul>
  61. </body>
  62. <timestamp>$Date$ $Author$</timestamp>
  63. <tags>
  64. <tag>legal</tag>
  65. <tag>Free Software</tag>
  66. </tags>
  67. </html>
  68. <!--
  69. Local Variables: ***
  70. mode: xml ***
  71. End: ***
  72. -->