Source files of fsfe.org, pdfreaders.org, freeyourandroid.org, ilovefs.org, drm.info, and test.fsfe.org. Contribute: https://fsfe.org/contribute/web/ https://fsfe.org
You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
 
 
 
 
 
 

118 lines
5.2 KiB

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<html newsdate="2011-05-25">
<version>1</version>
<head>
<title>FSFE in Samba case: Microsoft's defiance backfired</title>
</head>
<body>
<h1>FSFE in Samba case: Microsoft's defiance backfired</h1>
<p>Luxembourg, May 25 - FSFE played a key role at a Microsoft hearing
before the European Union's General Court on Tuesday, helping explain
the intricacies of Free Software servers.</p>
<p>The hearing was called to consider Microsoft's challenge to a EUR 899
million fine imposed by the European Commission in 2008. Microsoft had
failed to carry out remedies imposed for its violation of EU antitrust
law. A ruling is expected for later in the year.</p>
<p>Microsoft was required to provide interoperability information that
would enable others to hook up to its products so they could compete
with its workgroup servers. Key among those was the Samba team, which
is the only surviving competitor in the workgroup server market. Only
after a European Union court acted in 2007 to uphold nearly all of the
Commission's 2004 decision did Microsoft finally meet the Commission's
requirement to comply.</p>
<p>"In order to compete, the Samba team only needed the mundane
information about how Microsoft computers talk to each other," said
Tridgell. "There is nothing innovative here. All the innovative bits
are either already published by Microsoft's own researchers, or are
contained in the Microsoft program source code – and we have no
interest in seeing that. The innovation certainly isn't in the
protocol specifications."</p>
<p>Tridgell appeared before a panel headed by Chamber President Nicholas
James Forwood of Britain, which also included judges Franklin Dehousse
of Belgium and Juraj Schwarcz of Slovakia. Microsoft, the Commission,
and outside intervenors on both sides were also represented. FSFE and
the Samba team were represented by lawyer Carlo Piana.</p>
<p>The problems date back to the Commission's 2004 decision that
Microsoft should release interoperability information. After that, the
company played for time and waited three years to comply with the
Commission's demands. Explaining the significance of Samba for a
competitive software market, Chamber President Forwood said: “Samba is
the funnel through which the effects on the market will be produced.”</p>
<p>Microsoft contended that the information it had to provide was
valuable and innovative, and originally sought to charge high prices
for it. Tridgell demonstrated that the valuable information had
already been revealed by Microsoft in research papers and other public
fora. By contrast, the information that Samba team needed to
interoperate with computers running Microsoft Windows was neither
original nor innovative.</p>
<p>“Microsoft didn't keep this information secret because it was
valuable; the information was only valuable because it was kept
secret,” Piana told the Court on behalf of FSFE. He said it let
Microsoft preserve its dominant position, because no other software
was able to talk to the company's systems. “The company used these
three years to further entrench its dominant position in the market.”</p>
<p>“Microsoft is acting like a gambler who doubled up on a losing bet,
and now wants his money back,” said Nicholas Kahn, the representative
of the European Commission. By waiting three years before complying
with the Commission's decision while the clock on the fine was
ticking, Microsoft set the stakes very high – and finally lost.</p>
<p>“In this case, Europe's competition regulators have shown their
bite. We hope that the court will uphold the fine and make it clear
that companies in Europe have to play by the rules,” said Karsten
Gerloff, President of the Free Software Foundation Europe. “FSFE does
many things to help foster the growth of Free Software. We're proud to
help make the case for Free Software in a forum such as this, where we
believe we are providing a public service.”</p>
<p>Workgroup servers handle tasks used in small groups – printing,
signing in, and allocating permission to access particular files. The
Samba project not only provides an alternative to Microsoft's
workgroup server. It has come up with an alternative that is better in
many respects. For example, the Samba team used the trivial
information provided by Microsoft to build an innovative system that
runs on very small, cheap computers -- something that Microsoft's
software cannot do.</p>
<p>“The hearing established that Free Software is central to restoring
competition in the workgroup server market,” says Piana. “Everyone
agreed to this, including the judges. This case matters because it
highlights that interoperability is more important than a company's
interest in keeping its dominant position.”</p>
</body>
<tags>
<tag key="front-page"/>
<tag key="samba"/>
<tag key="european-court-justice"/>
<tag key="swpat">Software Patents</tag>
<tag key="microsoft"/>
<tag key="microsoft"/>
<tag key="european-union"/>
</tags>
<translator>mdim</translator>
</html>
<!--
Local Variables: ***
mode: xml ***
End: ***
-->