Source files of fsfe.org, pdfreaders.org, freeyourandroid.org, ilovefs.org, drm.info, and test.fsfe.org. Contribute: https://fsfe.org/contribute/web/
https://fsfe.org
You can not select more than 25 topics
Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
70 lines
2.1 KiB
70 lines
2.1 KiB
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
|
|
|
|
<html newsdate="2011-04-18">
|
|
<version>1</version>
|
|
|
|
<head>
|
|
<title>FSFE responds to EC consultation on procurement</title>
|
|
</head>
|
|
<body>
|
|
|
|
<h1>FSFE responds to EC consultation on procurement </h1>
|
|
|
|
<p>Free Software Foundation Europe has
|
|
provided the European Commission with <a href="https://download.fsfe.org/policy/procurement/20110418.ProcurementConsultation.FSFE.response.pdf">input on modernising the
|
|
way</a> in which public bodies buy software and related
|
|
services.</p>
|
|
|
|
<p>"Across Europe, the public sector has a huge role in the
|
|
software market," says Karsten Gerloff, FSFE's President. "As
|
|
the European Commission is revising the rules of procurement,
|
|
we want to make sure that the new regulations and practices
|
|
will be much fairer to Free Software than the current ones."
|
|
</p>
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
In its response to the Commission's
|
|
<a href="http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/publicprocurement/modernising_rules/consultations/index_en.htm">consultation</a>,
|
|
FSFE emphasises the following points:
|
|
<ul>
|
|
|
|
<li>When a public body contracts out software development, it should
|
|
have the right to use, study, share and improve the resulting
|
|
software. This is best achieved through a Free Software
|
|
license.</li>
|
|
|
|
<li>Public bodies should require new solutions to be based
|
|
on <a href="/freesoftware/standards/def.html">Open
|
|
Standards</a>.</li>
|
|
|
|
<li>Competitive bidding should be the rule. Negotiated procedures
|
|
(direct negotiations between a public body and a seller) should
|
|
remain limited to exceptional cases.</li>
|
|
|
|
<li>The rules should make clear that major software upgrades should
|
|
be treated in the same way as new purchases, and re-tendered in a
|
|
competitive process.</li>
|
|
|
|
<li>Public bodies should figure future exit costs into the total
|
|
cost of any new solution.</li>
|
|
</ul>
|
|
|
|
|
|
</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
</body>
|
|
<tags>
|
|
<tag key="front-page"/>
|
|
<tag key="european-commission"/>
|
|
<tag key="openstandards"/>
|
|
<tag key="procurement"/>
|
|
<tag key="policy"/>
|
|
</tags>
|
|
</html>
|
|
<!--
|
|
Local Variables: ***
|
|
mode: xml ***
|
|
End: ***
|
|
-->
|
|
|