Source files of,,,,, and Contribute:
You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.

99 lines

  1. <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
  2. <html newsdate="2011-02-09">
  3. <version>1</version>
  4. <head>
  5. <title>European Patent: FSFE urges European Parliament to wait for legal advice</title>
  6. </head>
  7. <body>
  8. <h1>European Patent: FSFE urges European Parliament to wait for legal advice</h1>
  9. <p>
  10. Free Software Foundation Europe is asking the Members of the European
  11. Parliament to wait for legal advice before voting on a unitary patent
  12. for Europe. While a proposal is on the Parliament's agenda for the
  13. coming week, a legal opinion by the European Court of Justice is
  14. expected later this month.
  15. </p>
  16. <p>
  17. "Software patents hurt innovation and are an unnecessary burden on
  18. European software developers," says Karsten Gerloff, President of the
  19. Free Software Foundation Europe. "Legislators need to take charge and
  20. make sure the patent system contributes to the public good. As the
  21. European Patent Organisation has acknowledged, this is a decision that
  22. cannot be left to bureaucrats and the judiciary."
  23. </p>
  24. <p>
  25. FSFE is concerned that the European Parliament will lose legislative
  26. competence regarding patents, which will then be controlled by the
  27. European Patent Organisation. This clearly creates a conflict of
  28. interest, as the EPO will be responsible both for awarding patents and
  29. for defining what is patentable. The EPO's expansionist record in this
  30. regard gives cause to worry that this will lead to software patents
  31. being validated.
  32. </p>
  33. <p>
  34. The European Court of Justice is expected to publish its opinion about
  35. the proposed "enhanced cooperation" of EU member states towards creating a
  36. single patent system for Europe. Documents published so far indicate
  37. that the Court will find the proposal in conflict with the EU
  38. treaties. Resolving these will require fundamental changes to the
  39. proposal. The Parliament's vote should take place after these changes
  40. so that the Parliament can review the actual proposal.
  41. </p>
  42. <p>
  43. FSFE hopes that the vote will be delayed until the Parliament can read
  44. the Court of Justice's opinion and has had time to analyse this
  45. proposal.
  46. </p>
  47. <h2>Contacts</h2>
  48. <p>
  49. Free Software Foundation Europe<br/>
  50. E-Mail: press at<br/><br/>
  51. Karsten Gerloff, President<br/>
  52. +49-176-96904298<br/>
  53. <a href="/contact/">More contact information</a>
  54. </p>
  55. <h2>About the Free Software Foundation Europe</h2>
  56. <p>
  57. The Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) is a non-profit non-
  58. governmental organisation active in many European countries and
  59. involved in many global activities. Access to software determines
  60. participation in a digital society. To secure equal participation in
  61. the information age, as well as freedom of competition, the Free
  62. Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) pursues and is dedicated to the
  63. furthering of Free Software, defined by the freedoms to use, study,
  64. modify and copy. Founded in 2001, creating awareness for these issues,
  65. securing Free Software politically and legally, and giving people
  66. Freedom by supporting development of Free Software are central issue
  67. of the FSFE.
  68. </p>
  69. </body>
  70. <tags>
  71. <tag key="front-page"/>
  72. <tag key="policy"/>
  73. <tag key="europeanparliament">European Parliament</tag>
  74. <tag key="patents">Software Patents</tag>
  75. </tags>
  76. </html>
  77. <!--
  78. Local Variables: ***
  79. mode: xml ***
  80. End: ***
  81. -->