delliottandDarragh Elliott
b9caf021a4
continuous-integration/drone/push Build is passing
Currently implements both a format hook to remove white-space paragraphs, and a check to make their existence a critical failure. In the end may implement only one or none of these, subject to major design changes. Solves #5409 Co-authored-by: Darragh Elliott <me@delliott.net> Reviewed-on: #5431 Co-authored-by: delliott <delliott@fsfe.org> Co-committed-by: delliott <delliott@fsfe.org>
29 lines
1.1 KiB
XML
29 lines
1.1 KiB
XML
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
|
||
<newsset>
|
||
<version>1</version>
|
||
|
||
<news date="2012-09-05">
|
||
<title>Blog: How the European patent system works</title>
|
||
<body>
|
||
<p> Now that software patents are back on the table, it’s
|
||
important to understand how the European patent system actually
|
||
works. You need to know this in order to discuss the unitary
|
||
patent and FSFE’s demands with the MEPs you call and ask for
|
||
support. Patent policy belongs under legislative control. Our current
|
||
political processes and institutions aren’t perfect, but they’re
|
||
certainly better than the EPO’s secretive insider culture. Good
|
||
patent policy needs transparency, accountability and
|
||
participation. The current proposal for the unitary patent lacks
|
||
all of these things.
|
||
</p>
|
||
</body>
|
||
<link>https://blogs.fsfe.org/gerloff/2012/09/05/how-the-european-patent-system-works/</link>
|
||
<tags>
|
||
<tag key="front-page"/>
|
||
<tag key="european-union"/>
|
||
<tag key="swpat">Software Patents</tag>
|
||
|
||
</tags>
|
||
</news>
|
||
</newsset>
|