223 lignes
9.3 KiB
HTML
223 lignes
9.3 KiB
HTML
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
|
|
|
|
<html>
|
|
<version>1</version>
|
|
|
|
<head>
|
|
|
|
<title>Public Procurement - Overview</title>
|
|
</head>
|
|
|
|
<body class="article" microformats="h-entry">
|
|
|
|
<p id="category">
|
|
<a href="/freesoftware/freesoftware.html">Free Software</a>
|
|
</p>
|
|
|
|
<h1 class="p-name">Public procurement</h1>
|
|
|
|
<div class="e-content">
|
|
|
|
<div class="p-summary">
|
|
|
|
<!--What's this class background? Where does it come from? Please don't put random classes-->
|
|
<p>
|
|
<a href="/freesoftware/basics/4freedoms.html">Free Software</a>
|
|
is a perfect fit for the public sector. It is a public resource that
|
|
government organisations can use, study, improve, and share with
|
|
each other. For citizens, this means transparency, cost efficiency,
|
|
and the freedom to interact with their government in the way that
|
|
suits them best.
|
|
</p>
|
|
<p>
|
|
But not all government institutions are taking advantage of Free
|
|
Software. In consequence, public funds are being wasted, and
|
|
programs that should be free are being locked away. This
|
|
also makes life hard for the Free Software-based companies who
|
|
employ people in Europe, and pay their taxes here.
|
|
</p>
|
|
</div>
|
|
|
|
<h2>FSFE explains the problem</h2>
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
Procurement is a field for specialists. Many procurement officials are
|
|
still not fully aware of Free Software. Combined with inertia in
|
|
public sector IT departments, this means that too many public bodies
|
|
never look beyond their long-standing relations with suppliers of
|
|
non-free software.
|
|
</p>
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
At FSFE, we work with journalists and researchers to highlight the
|
|
work of public sector organisations that are doing it right. When a
|
|
public body makes mistakes, we help them to correct them. And when
|
|
necessary, we put pressure on organisations that insist on harmful
|
|
ways of purchasing software.
|
|
</p>
|
|
|
|
<h2>Why procurement matters </h2>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
Public procurement spending equals nearly 20% of the EU's GDP <a class="fn" id="ref-ofe-procurement" href="#fn-ofe-procurement">1</a>. The
|
|
public sector's procurement choices have very real effects on the
|
|
economy, and play a significant role in determining the sort of firms
|
|
that thrive in the market.
|
|
|
|
Even with current procurement practices, Free Software already
|
|
delivers very significant benefits for the European economy. Daffara
|
|
(2012) estimates that Europeans enjoy 114 billion EUR per year in
|
|
direct cost savings thanks to Free Software<a class="fn" id="ref-daffara-estimate" href="#fn-daffara-estimate">2</a>.Anecdotal evidence points in the same direction. Many public adminstrations that begin using Free Software see their IT costs drop by 50-90%.
|
|
</p>
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
The public sector's buying decisions also has a significant influence
|
|
on the development of a healthy supplier ecosystem for Free Software
|
|
products and services. With more government institutions as their
|
|
customers, many such companies could thrive more quickly, and there
|
|
would be more and better Free Software programs available to the
|
|
public.
|
|
</p>
|
|
|
|
<h2>FSFE speaks up when things go wrong...</h2>
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
In 2010, the European Commission made <a href="/news/2010/news-20101207-01.html">a glaring mistake</a>. The
|
|
Commission had issued numerous policy statements in favour of Free
|
|
Software and Open Standards. But when it came to buying software and
|
|
services for itself, it went straight to Microsoft and its
|
|
resellers. Companies offering Free Software never had a chance, even
|
|
though their products offered the same functionality.
|
|
</p>
|
|
<p>
|
|
We saw that the Commission had certainly breached the spirit, if not
|
|
the letter, of the law. So we took them to task, generating lots of
|
|
press coverage - right up to the New York Times.
|
|
</p>
|
|
<p>
|
|
We want the European Commission to procure
|
|
the software products it needs in an open, competitive fashion,
|
|
giving Free Software suppliers the same opportunities as it gives
|
|
to proprietary vendors and their resellers.
|
|
</p>
|
|
<p>
|
|
We want the EC to take a long-term view of its IT strategy,
|
|
realise the dangers of lock-in, and figure future exit costs into
|
|
the price of any solution it acquires.
|
|
</p>
|
|
<p>
|
|
This is what the Commission owes to Europe's citizens. Sticking to
|
|
the letter and spirit of European procurement law would be an
|
|
excellent start.
|
|
</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<h2>…and offers independent solutions</h2>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
Fortunately, most people are more open to progress than that.
|
|
We help procurement officials understand the full impact of
|
|
their actions, and we help them to do better -- not only for
|
|
their organisations, but also for the citizens whom they serve.
|
|
</p>
|
|
<p>
|
|
At FSFE, we are in constant dialogues with procurement
|
|
specialists across Europe. We observe new approaches, identify
|
|
what works, and <a href="/news/2011/news-20110418-01.html">provide analysis</a> to decision makers. We help
|
|
specialists in different countries learn from each other.
|
|
</p>
|
|
<p>
|
|
To speed up change at the ground level, we also work with
|
|
national governments to help them draft policies that promote
|
|
Free Software adoption. In January 2014, Italy introduced <a href="/news/2014/news-20140116-01.html">a rule
|
|
requiring public bodies to first evaluate Free Software before
|
|
buying non-free solutions</a>. FSFE's General Counsel Carlo Piana
|
|
was part of the expert committee installed by the government to
|
|
design this rule, alongside participants from all sectors of the
|
|
software market.
|
|
</p>
|
|
<p>
|
|
This is the sort of change that FSFE helps to create. Please
|
|
<a href="https://my.fsfe.org/donate">support us</a> in this effort.
|
|
</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<h2 id="fn">Footnotes</h2>
|
|
<ol>
|
|
<li id="fn-ofe-procurement">Open Forum Europe (2013): <a href="http://openforumeurope.org/openprocurement/open-procurement-library/Report_2012_2ndSnapshot%20final.pdf/at_download/file">OFE Procurement Monitoring Report 2012 </a>, 2nd Snapshot, p. 2
|
|
<a href="#ref-ofe-procurement" class="ref">↩</a></li>
|
|
<li id="fn-daffara-estimate">Carlo Daffara (2012): Estimating the Economic Contribution of Open Source Software to the European Economy. In: Shane Coughlan (ed.)(2012): <a href="http://openforumacademy.org/library/ofa-fellows-reference-library/Hosted%20Files/first-conference-proceedingsA4.pdf"><em>The First OpenForum Academy Conference Proceedings</em></a>, pp. 11-14
|
|
<a href="#ref-daffara-estimate" class="ref">↩</a></li>
|
|
</ol>
|
|
|
|
</div><!--/e-content-->
|
|
|
|
<related-feed tag="procurement"/>
|
|
|
|
</body>
|
|
<sidebar promo="our-work">
|
|
<!-- FIXME: add related links to FSFE work & publications here -->
|
|
<h2>Publications</h2>
|
|
|
|
<ul>
|
|
<li><a href="/freesoftware/standards/2014-02-uk-consultation-os.html">Submission to UK Open Standards Proposal 2014</a></li>
|
|
|
|
<li><a href="http://www.openforumacademy.org/research/library/ofa-research/Thoughts_on_Open_Innovation%20-%20Chapter%207.pdf">Public Procurement: Free Software's wild
|
|
frontier</a> [pdf] (Karsten Gerloff, 2013) is a detailed discussion of procurement practices and policies. </li>
|
|
|
|
<li><a href="/freesoftware/standards/2012-06-uk-consultation-os.html">Submission to UK Open Standards Consultation 2012</a></li>
|
|
|
|
<li><a href="/news/2012/news-20120412-02.html">Executive summary and analysis of the Helsinki City and OpenOffice case in 2010-2011</a></li>
|
|
|
|
<li><a href="https://download.fsfe.org/policy/procurement/20110418.ProcurementConsultation.FSFE.response.pdf">Contribution to the EC public consultation on the modernisation of EU public procurement policy</a></li>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<!-- FIXME: add more links to FSFE work & publications here -->
|
|
|
|
|
|
</ul>
|
|
|
|
<h2>Ongoing Campaigns</h2>
|
|
<ul>
|
|
<li><a href="/activities/nledu/nledu.html">Campaign, Unlocking the Dutch educational system </a></li>
|
|
<li><a href="http://documentfreedom.org">Document Freedom Day</a></li>
|
|
<li><a href="http://www.pdfreaders.org">PDFreaders.org</a></li>
|
|
</ul>
|
|
<h2>Blog entries</h2>
|
|
<ul>
|
|
<li><a href="https://blogs.fsfe.org/gerloff/2013/04/17/european-parliament-to-report-on-own-use-of-free-software/">European Parliament to report on own use of Free Software</a></li>
|
|
|
|
<li><a href="https://blogs.fsfe.org/gerloff/2012/07/18/helping-the-european-parliament-to-release-its-own-free-software/">Helping the European Parliament to release its own Free Software</a></li>
|
|
|
|
<li><a href="https://blogs.fsfe.org/gerloff/2011/06/06/the-european-commissions-locked-in-syndrome/">
|
|
The European Commission’s locked-in syndrome</a></li>
|
|
|
|
<li><a href="https://blogs.fsfe.org/gerloff/2014/01/15/european-commission-still-in-denial-on-vendor-lock-in/"> European Commission still in denial on vendor lock-in</a></li>
|
|
<li><a href="https://blogs.fsfe.org/greve/?p=160">"An emerging understanding of Open Standards"</a> by Georg Greve</li>
|
|
</ul>
|
|
<h2>External links of interest</h2>
|
|
|
|
<ul>
|
|
<li><a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20121206052723/http://odfalliance.org/">ODF Alliance</a></li>
|
|
<li><a href="http://www.fsf.org/resources/formats/playogg">Play Ogg!</a></li>
|
|
<li><a
|
|
href="http://isp.law.yale.edu/static/papers/Open_Documents_and_Democracy.pdf">"Open
|
|
Documents and Democracy"</a> by Laura de Nardis and Eric Tam, Yale Information Society Project</li>
|
|
<li><a href="http://www.intgovforum.org/Substantive_1st_IGF/openstandards-IGF.pdf">"An Economic Basis for Open Standards"</a> by Rishab A. Ghosh</li>
|
|
<li><a href="http://www.openforumeurope.org/openprocurement">Open Forum Europe, procurement work</a></li>
|
|
</ul>
|
|
</sidebar>
|
|
|
|
</html>
|
|
<!--
|
|
Local Variables: ***
|
|
mode: xml ***
|
|
End: ***
|
|
-->
|