Source files of fsfe.org, pdfreaders.org, freeyourandroid.org, ilovefs.org, drm.info, and test.fsfe.org. Contribute: https://fsfe.org/contribute/web/ https://fsfe.org
You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.

letter-20040906.en.xhtml 5.2KB

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123
  1. <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
  2. <html>
  3. <head>
  4. <title>
  5. Europe should conserve a competitive advantage and prohibit a legal basis
  6. for software patents - September 6th, 2004
  7. </title>
  8. </head>
  9. <body>
  10. <center><h1>Software Patents in Europe</h1>
  11. [<a href="/campaigns/swpat/swpat.html">Introduction</a> | <a
  12. href="/campaigns/swpat/background.html">Background</a> | <a
  13. href="/campaigns/swpat/status.html">Status</a> | <a
  14. href="/campaigns/swpat/documents.html">Further Reading</a> ]
  15. </center>
  16. <br />
  17. <center> Open Letter
  18. [<a href="/campaigns/swpat/letter-20040510.html">2004-05-10</a>]
  19. [<a href="/campaigns/swpat/letter-20040531.html">2004-05-31</a>]
  20. [<a href="/campaigns/swpat/letter-20040706.html">2004-07-06</a>]
  21. [<a href="/campaigns/swpat/letter-20040802.html">2004-08-02</a>]
  22. [2004-09-06]
  23. [<a href="/campaigns/swpat/letter-20041004.html">2004-10-04</a>]
  24. [<a href="/campaigns/swpat/letter-20041101.html">2004-11-01</a>]
  25. [<a href="/campaigns/swpat/letter-20041206.html">2004-12-06</a>]
  26. [<a href="/campaigns/swpat/letter-20050103.html">2005-01-03</a>]
  27. [<a href="/campaigns/swpat/letter-20050207.html">2005-02-07</a>]
  28. [<a href="/campaigns/swpat/letter-20050307.html">2005-03-07</a>]
  29. [<a href="/campaigns/swpat/letter-20050405.html">2005-04-05</a>]
  30. [<a href="/campaigns/swpat/letter-20050502.html">2005-05-02</a>]
  31. [<a href="/campaigns/swpat/letter-20050606.html">2005-06-06</a>]
  32. </center>
  33. <h2>
  34. No software patents, conserve competitive advantage!
  35. </h2>
  36. <h3>September 6th, 2004</h3>
  37. <p>
  38. Dear Prime Minister,<br />
  39. Dear Dr. Balkenende,
  40. </p>
  41. <p>
  42. The new Commission of the European Union would like to speed up the
  43. "Lisbon"-Process to make Europe the "most competitive knowledge-based
  44. economy by 2010". This is a reasonable aim which is worthy of support
  45. by European citizens. However, the EU is considering legislation which
  46. will have adverse effects on the software market. We - the Free
  47. Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) - would like to call your attention
  48. to this important issue. With your help it may be possible to avoid
  49. this problem before it gets off the ground in the EU.
  50. </p>
  51. <p>
  52. Software patents are used to hinder competitors software innovation.
  53. This is the sole reason that a virtual waste paper basket is patented,
  54. the incorporation of applications into a website is patented, and or
  55. the ordering of gifts via the internet is patented. These ideas are not
  56. very innovative, but they are necessary to make the whole application
  57. run and be usable by anybody. It is just the same as with a car: To get
  58. access to the real innovations you need to use trivial features such as
  59. a steering wheel.
  60. </p>
  61. <p>
  62. In the last few weeks we have seen what happens to project management
  63. in business and public administration because of a demanding project,
  64. such as in Munich. A member of the city council feared that the project
  65. might infringe a patent - and the project got into trouble for a whole
  66. week, although software giants IBM are interested in managing this
  67. project because of its international prestige. This was paralleled
  68. worldwide, as similar projects are supposedly threatened as well.
  69. </p>
  70. <p>
  71. From now on any introduction of SAP will be in danger. The same way it
  72. might get impossible to implement additional security features to
  73. eliminate a bug in a web server - because there might at any time be
  74. someone who speculates whether the ideas behind the implementation are
  75. "protected" by software patents. For these reasons voices in the US
  76. would like to get rid of the innovation blockade which are "software
  77. patents".
  78. </p>
  79. <p>
  80. 30,000 software patents already exist in the EU; this contradicts the
  81. spirit of the present patent law in the EU. Three quarters of software
  82. patents are held by non-European companies. To give software patents a
  83. legal basis may be a decision which would make the EU far less
  84. competitive. That is why we would like to ask the European Council to
  85. revise its agreement on software patents of May 18th. Instead the
  86. Council should decide to make sure innovation can take place and not be
  87. restricted by software patents in the future.
  88. </p>
  89. <p>
  90. During the dutch Presidency of the European Union you have the best
  91. opportunity to initiate this revision. In the interest of Europe you
  92. should not hesitate to make this revision.
  93. </p>
  94. <p>Yours sincerely</p>
  95. <p>
  96. Georg Greve<br />
  97. President<br />
  98. Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE)
  99. </p>
  100. </body>
  101. <timestamp>$Date$ $Author$</timestamp>
  102. </html>
  103. <!--
  104. Local Variables: ***
  105. mode: xml ***
  106. End: ***
  107. -->