Source files of fsfe.org, pdfreaders.org, freeyourandroid.org, ilovefs.org, drm.info, and test.fsfe.org. Contribute: https://fsfe.org/contribute/web/ https://fsfe.org
You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
 
 
 
 
 
 

96 lines
3.2 KiB

  1. <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
  2. <html>
  3. <version>1</version>
  4. <head>
  5. <title>Towards a "World Intellectual Wealth Organisation"</title>
  6. </head>
  7. <body>
  8. <p class="tagline">Towards a</p>
  9. <h1>“World Intellectual Wealth Organisation”</h1>
  10. <h2>Supporting the Geneva Declaration</h2>
  11. <p>
  12. The <a
  13. href="http://www.cptech.org/ip/wipo/genevadeclaration.html">Geneva
  14. Declaration</a> is an impressive step towards the creation of a broad
  15. coalition of people, organisations and countries<a href="#fn1"
  16. class="fn">1</a> demanding that the international community re-think the
  17. goals and mechanisms for awarding monopoly control over different kinds of
  18. knowledge. It offers many constructive, concrete suggestions for changes
  19. in WIPO goals, policies and priorities, and provides ample and insightful
  20. arguments for redesign of the copyright and patent bargains to better
  21. serve the public interest of all of humankind.
  22. </p>
  23. <p>
  24. We are convinced that new answers sometimes require new questions,
  25. not more careful repetition of old questions. A World Intellectual
  26. Property Organisation will always, understandably, lean towards
  27. applying the pre-selected tool-set of monopolisation that it
  28. refers to as Intellectual Property; a term that we find to be
  29. ideologically charged and dangerously oblivious to the significant
  30. differences that exist between the many areas of law that it tries
  31. to subsume.
  32. </p>
  33. <p>
  34. While it may look at better, possibly more socially sustainable
  35. ways of granting ownership-like monopolies over different forms of
  36. knowledge, WIPO will not have an easy time looking for alternative
  37. solutions. WIPO is not what we need.
  38. </p>
  39. <p>
  40. We need a World Intellectual Wealth Organisation, dedicated to the
  41. research and promotion of novel and imaginative ways to encourage
  42. the production and dissemination of knowledge. Granting limited
  43. monopolies and limited control over some kinds of knowledge may be
  44. part of this new organisation's tool-set, but not the only one,
  45. and maybe not even the most important one.
  46. </p>
  47. <p>
  48. We endorse and support the <a
  49. href="http://www.cptech.org/ip/wipo/genevadeclaration.html">Geneva
  50. Declaration</a>, and invite its drafters, signatories, and the
  51. United Nations to start thinking now not only about what the role
  52. of WIPO should be, but rather what kind of organisation we need in
  53. its place.
  54. </p>
  55. <h2 id="fn">References</h2>
  56. <ol>
  57. <li id="fn1">
  58. Proposal by Argentina and Brazil for the establishment of a
  59. development agenda for WIPO: <a
  60. href="http://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/govbody/en/wo_ga_31/wo_ga_31_11.pdf">http://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/govbody/en/wo_ga_31/wo_ga_31_11.pdf</a>
  61. </li>
  62. </ol>
  63. <h2>Signatories</h2>
  64. <signatories/>
  65. <p>
  66. If you wish to see your name or the name of your organisation
  67. added to this list, please contact <a
  68. href="mailto:web@lists.fsfe.org">web@lists.fsfe.org</a>.
  69. </p>
  70. </body>
  71. </html>
  72. <!--
  73. Local Variables: ***
  74. mode: xml ***
  75. End: ***
  76. -->