Source files of fsfe.org, pdfreaders.org, freeyourandroid.org, ilovefs.org, drm.info, and test.fsfe.org. Contribute: https://fsfe.org/contribute/web/
https://fsfe.org
You can not select more than 25 topics
Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
161 lines
7.0 KiB
161 lines
7.0 KiB
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?> |
|
|
|
<html> |
|
<version>1</version> |
|
|
|
<head> |
|
<title>PDFreaders - Free Software PDF Readers</title> |
|
</head> |
|
<body class="article" microformats="h-entry"> |
|
|
|
<h1 class="p-name">Free Software PDF Readers </h1> |
|
|
|
<div class="captioned right" style="max-width: 650px; width: 53%"> |
|
<a href="/activities/pdfreaders/highway.png"> |
|
<img src="/activities/pdfreaders/highway.png" alt="highway" width="100%"/> |
|
</a> |
|
</div> |
|
<div class="e-content"> |
|
</div> |
|
<div class="p-summary"> |
|
|
|
<p>What would you think about a sign on the highway saying “You need a |
|
Toyota to drive on this road. Contact your Toyota dealer for a gratis |
|
test drive -- Your Government”? When it comes to software that opens PDF |
|
files, many public sector organisations do this every day.</p> |
|
|
|
</div> |
|
|
|
<p>With the pdfreaders.org campaign we have turned the spotlight on |
|
government organisations who behave in this way, exposing how frequent such |
|
advertisements for non-free software are. With the help of activists across |
|
Europe, <a href="/activities/pdfreaders/follow-up.html">we contacted</a> these |
|
organisations and explained to them how to improve their websites so that |
|
they respect our freedom.</p> |
|
|
|
<h2>Why should we care?</h2> |
|
|
|
<p>Even when a certain software is given away for free, the company behind it |
|
can have an economic gain: promoting that software means prioritising a |
|
specific company. Public bodies should not promote any specific private |
|
company, instead they should promote equality and choice on the software |
|
market. That is why FSFE and its volunteers intervened to fix the |
|
problem.</p> |
|
|
|
<p>This campaign was based on three core principles we support at FSFE:</p> |
|
|
|
<ul> |
|
|
|
<li>Neutrality - Public institutions should not engage in advertising</li> |
|
|
|
<li>Freedom - Public institutions should not ask citizens to use non-free |
|
Software</li> |
|
|
|
<li><a href="/freesoftware/standards/def.html">Open Standards</a> – The versions of |
|
the PDF format which are Open Standards can be implemented by all PDF |
|
readers</li> |
|
|
|
</ul> |
|
|
|
<h2>What did we achieve?</h2> |
|
|
|
<div class="captioned left"> |
|
<a href="/activities/pdfreaders/finanzBrandenburg.png"> |
|
<img src="/activities/pdfreaders/finanzBrandenburg_p.png" alt="Finance ministry Brandenburg" /></a> |
|
<footer> |
|
<p>Example from Germany with the advertisement</p> |
|
</footer> |
|
</div> |
|
|
|
<p>Every day, public institutions advertise non-free software on their |
|
websites. With the help of our Fellows and of hundreds other Free Software |
|
activists, we collected <a |
|
href="/activities/pdfreaders/buglist.html">2104 bug |
|
reports</a> over the course of one month from every country in Europe, |
|
and also nine countries outside of Europe. </p> |
|
|
|
<p>Next, the FSFE and its volunteers sent letters to all the public |
|
administrations on our list asking them to either remove their advertising |
|
for proprietary software, or to at least run equal advertising for Free |
|
Software, so that users of their websites realise that they have a choice. In |
|
response, we received a lot of positive feedback from the institutions |
|
thanking us for our letters.</p> |
|
|
|
<p>Several years, and thousands of letters later, the FSFE has closed |
|
the campaign. Thanks to all the dedicated Free Software activists who helped |
|
contact institutions, we can proudly announce that we were able to remove |
|
advertisements for proprietary PDF readers in 1125 of the 2104 public |
|
administration websites (53%).</p> |
|
|
|
<div class="captioned right"> |
|
<a href="/activities/pdfreaders/BrandenburgResolved.png"> |
|
<img src="/activities/pdfreaders/BrandenburgResolved_p.png" alt="resolved" /></a> |
|
<footer> |
|
<p>The same website after they fixed it</p> |
|
</footer> |
|
</div> |
|
|
|
<p>Furthermore, we were able to push for a change at both national and |
|
international levels.</p> |
|
|
|
<ul> |
|
|
|
<li> In Germany, <a |
|
href="http://gruen-digital.de/2012/03/document-freedom-day-kleine-anfrage-zur-werbung-fuer-adobe-reader-eingereicht/">national |
|
parties</a> gave statements in favour of free PDF readers and the |
|
German Government itself has recommended the usage of our text snippet |
|
in their <a |
|
href="http://www.cio.bund.de/Web/DE/Architekturen-und-Standards/Migrationsleitfaden-und-Migrationshilfen/migrationsleitfaden_node.html">migration |
|
guide</a>. FSFE's coordinator for Germany, Max Mehl, <a href="http://blog.mehl.mx/2015/german-government-wants-authorities-to-advertise-pdfreaders/">covers it</a> |
|
in more detail on his blog.</li> |
|
|
|
<li>In the EU: the European Parliament <a |
|
href="/activities/pdfreaders/parliamentary-questions-eu.html">directly |
|
asked</a> the European Commission what were the reasons for advertising |
|
a specific software and which steps were taken to solve this problem.</li> |
|
|
|
<li> In 2011 one of our pdfreaders.org coordinators, <a |
|
href="https://blogs.fsfe.org/polina/2015/09/10/free-pdf-reader-for-the-web-browser/"> |
|
Hannes Hauswedell, was in contact with Google</a>, asking them to |
|
release the PDF reader included in their Chrome browser as Free Software. |
|
Finally, in May 2014 the <a |
|
href="https://twitter.com/nasko/status/469595752734269440"> pdfium |
|
sources were published openly</a>, and while FSFE's inquiry might not |
|
have been the only reason they were released, it marks an important |
|
change for the widespread adoption of Free Software PDF readers.</li> |
|
|
|
</ul> |
|
|
|
<p>In addition to contacting public institutions to resolve the issue, FSFE |
|
also collected signatures from 90 organisations, 63 businesses, and 2731 |
|
individuals who demanded equal access for Free Software PDF readers. This |
|
wide-ranging support also demonstrated the popularity of the campaign |
|
overall.</p> |
|
|
|
<h2>What's next?</h2> |
|
|
|
<p>The Free Software movement is, above all, supported by its community; we |
|
always need your help to continue to help promote free PDFreaders, and |
|
together we can make a difference for the future of Free Software! We |
|
encourage you to continue to <a href="/activities/pdfreaders/letter.html">use |
|
our template and send letters</a> or emails to public bodies that are still |
|
advertising for proprietary software and closed standards. We also have a |
|
link for tips on <a href="/activities/pdfreaders/follow-up.html">how to |
|
follow up with the relevant institution</a>. This is a great (and easy) |
|
activity for a local Free Software groups to spread Free Software knowledge |
|
in the public administration.</p> |
|
|
|
</body> |
|
<sidebar GoingFurther="pdfreaders" promo="about-fsfe"> |
|
<h3>More on PDF Readers</h3> |
|
<ul> |
|
<li><a href="/activities/pdfreaders/follow-up.html">How to contact institutions</a></li> |
|
<li><a href="/activities/pdfreaders/buglist.html">List of reported institutions</a></li> |
|
<li><a href="/activities/pdfreaders/petition.html">The petition</a></li> |
|
<li><a href="/activities/pdfreaders/letter.html">Model Letter</a></li> |
|
<li><a href="http://www.pdfreaders.org">List of Free Software PDF readers</a></li> |
|
</ul> |
|
</sidebar> |
|
<followup>subscribe-nl</followup> |
|
</html> |
|
|
|
|