Source files of fsfe.org, pdfreaders.org, freeyourandroid.org, ilovefs.org, drm.info, and test.fsfe.org. Contribute: https://fsfe.org/contribute/web/
https://fsfe.org
You can not select more than 25 topics
Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
121 lines
5.3 KiB
121 lines
5.3 KiB
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?> |
|
|
|
<html> |
|
<version>1</version> |
|
|
|
<head> |
|
<title>FSF Europe - EUCD - Copyright extensions that harm</title> |
|
</head> |
|
|
|
<body> |
|
<p class="postit"> |
|
Meanwhile, the EUCD has been implemented in all EU member countries. |
|
These pages are kept for archiving purposes. |
|
</p> |
|
|
|
<h1>EUCD - Copyright extensions that harm</h1> |
|
<p> |
|
In December 1996 in Geneve the WIPO Copyright Treaty was signed by |
|
most, if not all, developed countries. By signing this treaty these |
|
countries compromised themselves to give away the right to use a |
|
copyrighted work in favour of protection of electronic protections, |
|
independently of their effectiveness. |
|
</p> |
|
<p> |
|
Today we are starting to see the effects of this kind of |
|
legislation. The U.S. Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) and |
|
the European Union Copyright Directive (EUCD) pass the WIPO treaty |
|
into effective law. This page is about the effects of this kind of |
|
legislation and related resources. |
|
</p> |
|
<p> |
|
The risks of this kind of legislation are: |
|
</p> |
|
<ul> |
|
<li> |
|
<strong>Monopolies on file formats</strong> - This is the issue that |
|
is worrying libraries. The ability to effectively control a file |
|
format means that each e-book format will have its own reader and it |
|
will only be readable by that company's reader. Maintaining access |
|
to all the different kinds of readers throughout decades needs the |
|
kind of personnel and technological ability that libraries can't |
|
afford right now, not to mention the cost of e-book readers that |
|
they'll need to have to give access to the library's users. |
|
</li> |
|
<li> |
|
<strong>Interoperability</strong> - If you can't use and share tools |
|
to analyze protocols, because they can be used to circumvent |
|
ineffective technological measures, then it's not possible to put |
|
two systems working together unless both vendors publish information |
|
on the protocols they use. Knowing the trend of proprietary software |
|
vendors to trap a client in its systems, this is not a realistic |
|
scenario. |
|
</li> |
|
<li> |
|
<strong>Insecurity</strong> - In the last years the full disclosure |
|
movement has made considerable improvements on the whole security of |
|
computer systems. This was done by forcing vendors to correct the |
|
vulnerabilities through the publishing of vulnerabilities even if |
|
they weren't corrected in a limited timeframe. To avoid an image |
|
problem most vendors started correcting in days what used to take |
|
months or even years to do. With this legislation a vulnerability |
|
that allows the circumvention of rights-management information |
|
cannot be even communicated. This means that full disclosure is not |
|
an option, and that we all lose its advantages. |
|
</li> |
|
<li> |
|
<strong>Freedom of Speech</strong> - By allowing copyright owners to |
|
define terms of use and protecting all measures taken by those |
|
owners to enforce those terms of use can limit rights as basic as |
|
freedom of speech. The most recent example is Microsoft Frontpage |
|
2002's latest End-User License Agreement (EULA) that prohibits the |
|
usage of the software to create sites that criticise Microsoft or |
|
any of its subsidiaries. |
|
</li> |
|
</ul> |
|
<h2>Legislation</h2> |
|
<p> |
|
The pieces of legislation that follow the letter of the <a |
|
href="http://www.wipo.int/clea/docs/en/wo/wo033en.htm">WIPO Copyright |
|
Treaty</a> are: |
|
</p> |
|
<ul> |
|
<li><a href="http://www.loc.gov/copyright/legislation/dmca.pdf">Digital Millennium Copyrigth Act</a> (USA)</li> |
|
<li><a href="http://europa.eu.int/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexapi!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32001L0029&model=guichett">European Union Copyright Directive</a> (EU)</li> |
|
<li><a href="http://www.ag.gov.au/publications/copyfactsheet/copyfactsheet.html">Copyright Amendment (Digital Agenda) Act 2000</a> (AU)</li> |
|
</ul> |
|
<h2>Legislation Analysis</h2> |
|
<p> |
|
This legislation as already been analyzed by law professors, experts |
|
and others. Following is a sample of those analysis: |
|
</p> |
|
<ul> |
|
<li><a href="http://www.ivir.nl/publications/hugenholtz/opinion-EIPR.html">An analysis by a dutch pofessor of law</a>.</li> |
|
<li><a href="eucd-fs.html">Copyright Extensions threaten Free Software in Europe</a></li> |
|
</ul> |
|
<h2>Organisations against Copyright Extensions</h2> |
|
<p> |
|
Some organisations have understood the impact of this kind of |
|
legislation and have made statements about it: |
|
</p> |
|
<ul> |
|
<li><a href="http://www.acm.org/usacm/IP/dmca.exemption.htm">Association for Computer Machinery</a></li> |
|
<li><a href="http://www.eff.org/Legal/active_legal.html">Electronic Frontier Foundation</a></li> |
|
<li><a href="http://www.eblida.org/topics/position/legaffa.htm">EBLIDA |
|
Comments on Copyright Directive</a> - European Bureau of Library, |
|
Information and Documentation Associations, The European Consumers' |
|
Association, European Association of Consumer Electronics |
|
Manufacturers, European Blind Union, European Disability Forum, |
|
International League of Societies for Persons with Mental Handicap - |
|
European Association |
|
</li> |
|
</ul> |
|
|
|
</body> |
|
|
|
</html> |
|
<!-- |
|
Local Variables: *** |
|
mode: xml *** |
|
End: *** |
|
-->
|
|
|