FSFE/fsfe-website
30
33
Fork 96
Code Issues 65 Pull Requests 12 Wiki Activity

Add copyright and license headers on look #2685

Closed
nico.rikken wants to merge 2 commits from feature/license-annotations into master
pull from: feature/license-annotations
merge into: FSFE:master
Conversation 7 Commits 2 Files Changed 141
+955 -4
nico.rikken commented 2022-06-14 06:58:50 +00:00
Member
Copy Link
Copy Source

Provide copyright and license headers for the files related to the look of the website. This includes the Bootstrap framework and fonts.
Licenses are included in the LICENSES directory as a step towards REUSE compliance.

Signed-off-by: Nico Rikken nico.rikken@fsfe.org

Provide copyright and license headers for the files related to the look of the website. This includes the Bootstrap framework and fonts. Licenses are included in the LICENSES directory as a step towards REUSE compliance. Signed-off-by: Nico Rikken <nico.rikken@fsfe.org>
nico.rikken added 1 commit 2022-06-14 06:58:52 +00:00
Add copyright and license headers on look
continuous-integration/drone/pr Build is passing
Details
d801e58edc 
Provide copyright and license headers for the files related to the look of the website. This includes the Bootstrap framework and fonts.
Licenses are included in the LICENSES directory as a step towards REUSE compliance.

Signed-off-by: Nico Rikken <nico.rikken@fsfe.org>
nico.rikken commented 2022-06-14 07:01:07 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy Link
Copy Source

Some comments on this PR

I didn't know what would be the beginning year for the FSFE styles, so I didn't include a date in the copyright annotations. If anyone knows that would certainly improve the quality of the annotations.

The share button styles originate from a separate repository. For now I've kept the AGPL-3.0-or-later license defined there: https://git.fsfe.org/FSFE/share-buttons Considering that we decided on CC0-1.0 for the styles, that could also apply there and the license could be updated in this repository.

### Some comments on this PR I didn't know what would be the beginning year for the FSFE styles, so I didn't include a date in the copyright annotations. If anyone knows that would certainly improve the quality of the annotations. The share button styles originate from a separate repository. For now I've kept the `AGPL-3.0-or-later` license defined there: https://git.fsfe.org/FSFE/share-buttons Considering that we decided on `CC0-1.0` for the styles, that could also apply there and the license could be updated in this repository.
nico.rikken added 1 commit 2022-06-14 20:23:59 +00:00
Improve license information of Roboto fonts
continuous-integration/drone/pr Build is passing
Details
f4e0d64d4c 
There is more accurate information in the MATADATA.pb files in the font repositories:

https://github.com/google/fonts/blob/main/apache/roboto/METADATA.pb
https://github.com/google/fonts/blob/main/apache/robotoslab/METADATA.pb

Signed-off-by: Nico Rikken <nico.rikken@fsfe.org>
max.mehl commented 2022-07-27 14:15:59 +00:00
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

Thanks for working on this!

As author of the share-buttons and also the one who chose the license, I would be fine with re-licensing them to CC0-1.0. Shall I do this first so you can update this branch here accordingly?

Thanks for working on this! As author of the share-buttons and also the one who chose the license, I would be fine with re-licensing them to CC0-1.0. Shall I do this first so you can update this branch here accordingly?
nico.rikken commented 2022-07-27 20:30:26 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy Link
Copy Source

@max.mehl yes please, good suggestion.

@max.mehl yes please, good suggestion.
max.mehl commented 2022-07-28 09:22:07 +00:00
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

Alright, please find the relicensed upstream here: https://git.fsfe.org/FSFE/share-buttons

Alright, please find the relicensed upstream here: https://git.fsfe.org/FSFE/share-buttons
bonnie commented 2022-10-12 12:24:38 +00:00
Member
Copy Link
Copy Source

@nico.rikken: thank you very much for taking care of this. I was wondering what the current state is and if there are any blockers?

@nico.rikken: thank you very much for taking care of this. I was wondering what the current state is and if there are any blockers?
nico.rikken commented 2022-10-12 19:30:26 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy Link
Copy Source

The discussion on unlicense vs CC-1.0 was a blocker. Now I just need to update the pull-request.

The discussion on unlicense vs CC-1.0 was a blocker. Now I just need to update the pull-request.
👍 2
bonnie commented 2022-10-13 08:24:23 +00:00
Member
Copy Link
Copy Source

The discussion on unlicense vs CC-1.0 was a blocker. Now I just need to update the pull-request.

nice :) and thank you very much! let me know if you need anything and I will try my best to help.

> The discussion on unlicense vs CC-1.0 was a blocker. Now I just need to update the pull-request. nice :) and thank you very much! let me know if you need anything and I will try my best to help.
tobiasd closed this pull request 2024-05-23 09:21:10 +00:00
All checks were successful
continuous-integration/drone/pr Build is passing
Required
Details

Pull request closed

This pull request cannot be reopened because the branch was deleted.
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No Reviewers
Labels
Clear labels
bug
build
cgi Scripting
design
disruptive
Requires careful coordination and documentation changes
 documentation
duplicate
easy
enhancement
Improving what is already there
 feature-request
help wanted
javascript
priority/low
question
system-hackers
tagging
text
translations
wait/bugfix
wait/inprogress
wait/misc
wait/proofread
wontfix
xsl
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Assignees
Clear assignees
albert (Albert Dengg) alex.busch (alex.busch) alex.sander (alex.sander) anaghz (anaghz) annarita.russo (annarita.russo) ao (André Ockers) bcludts (bcludts) bonnie (bonnie) cryptie (cryptie) dario (dario) delliott (delliott) dfajfer (Damian Fajfer) dmaphy (Dominic Hopf) doczkal (Thomas Doczkal) eal (eal) egnun (Erik Grun) eventregbot (eventregbot) fi (fi) floriansnow (Florian Snow) gabriel.ku (gabriel.ku) guido (guido) hugo (hugo) ineiev (ineiev) jithendra (jithendra) jn (jn) jzarl (jzarl) linus (Linus Sehn) lucabon (Luca Bonissi) lucas.lasota (lucas.lasota) max.mehl (Max Mehl) mk (Matthias Kirschner) monochromec (monochromec) mweimann (Michael Weimann) nico.rikken (nico.rikken) patrick (Patrick Ohnewein) reinhard (Reinhard Müller) renovate-bot (Renovate Bot) repentinus (Heiki Lõhmus) schiessle (Björn Schießle) silviarbgl (Silvia Rbgl) sofiaritz (Sofía Aritz) tobiasd (tobiasd) vincent (vincent)
No Assignees
3 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: FSFE/fsfe-website#2685
Delete Branch "feature/license-annotations"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?