back reference footnotes #1808 #1809

doczkal · 2021-02-09T20:37:28Z

doczkal commented

2021-02-09 20:37:28 +00:00

No description provided.

doczkal added 1 commit 2021-02-09 20:37:31 +00:00

continuous-integration/drone/pr Build is passing Details

3310e21468 change append /about/reports/ #1808

doczkal referenced this pull request

2021-02-09 20:42:21 +00:00

news/2003/news-20030602-01 references #1808

max.mehl reviewed 2021-02-12 15:19:33 +00:00

news/2003/news-20030602-01.el.xhtml Outdated

						
				@ -268,3 +252,1 @@

				[<a href="es-2003.html" name="18">18</a>] <a href="/">https://fsfe.org</a>

				[<a href="es-2003.html" name="19">19</a>] <a href="/activities/ftf/">https://fsfe.org/activities/ftf/</a>

				[<a href="es-2003.html" name="20">20</a>] (υπερσύνδεσμος όχι πια διαθέσιμος)

				[<a href="/about/reports/es-2003.html" name="1">1</a>]  <a href="/about/history/doi.html">https://fsfe.org/about/history/doi.html</a>

max.mehl commented

2021-02-12 15:19:29 +00:00

As written in my comment, my idea for these lines, on this example:

[1] <a href="/about/history/doi.html">https://fsfe.org/about/history/doi.html</a>

As written in [my comment](https://git.fsfe.org/FSFE/fsfe-website/issues/1808#issuecomment-11143), my idea for these lines, on this example: ``` [1] <a href="/about/history/doi.html">https://fsfe.org/about/history/doi.html</a> ```

doczkal marked this conversation as resolved

max.mehl referenced this pull request

2021-02-12 15:19:56 +00:00

WIP: exchange es-2003.html by news-20030602-01.html #1808 #1810

doczkal commented

2021-02-14 08:57:02 +00:00

@max.mehl I think you assumption is right but the referrenced page has a different purpose of the Footnote. In your referrence the Footnote is additional information and in this page the context of the footnote is the URL.

So I think a back referrence on the same file would be more appropriate? Maybe you suggested it but your code example does not fullfill it.

I'll play with my local build today and try different options.

@max.mehl I think you assumption is right but the referrenced page has a different purpose of the Footnote. In your referrence the Footnote is additional information and in this page the context of the footnote is the URL. So I think a back referrence on the same file would be more appropriate? Maybe you suggested it but your code example does not fullfill it. I'll play with my local build today and try different options.

doczkal added 1 commit 2021-02-14 10:04:27 +00:00