Change FontAwesome to ForkAwesome #217

Closed
opened 2018-03-19 15:32:04 +00:00 by max.mehl · 5 comments
Owner

There is a FontAwesome fork which seems to have better licencing terms for its symbols. We might consider using it: https://forkawesome.github.io/Fork-Awesome/

There is a FontAwesome fork which seems to have better licencing terms for its symbols. We might consider using it: https://forkawesome.github.io/Fork-Awesome/
max.mehl added the
feature-request
design
easy
labels 2018-03-19 15:32:04 +00:00
Member

From a quick look, it seems like the licensing terms of FontAwesome are prefectly fine and actually the same as ForkAwesome. The reasons for the fork seems to be that FontAwesome refused some patches in the past - something which I don't consider an evil thing in itself...

From a quick look, it seems like the licensing terms of FontAwesome are prefectly fine and actually the same as ForkAwesome. The reasons for the fork seems to be that FontAwesome refused some patches in the past - something which I don't consider an evil thing in itself...
Author
Owner

Right, then I misread it from a posting I saw.

ForkAwesome seems to have a few interesting icons though, e.g. Diaspora and gnu-social, which we use in the social share buttons. But yes, this is low-priority.

Right, then I misread it from a posting I saw. ForkAwesome seems to have a few interesting icons though, e.g. Diaspora and gnu-social, which we use in the social share buttons. But yes, this is low-priority.
max.mehl added the
priority/low
label 2018-05-14 10:02:09 +00:00
reinhard removed the due date 0001-01-01 2019-04-29 21:06:02 +00:00
Author
Owner

I think we can make a decision here based on the amount and selection of icons the different projects offer. FontAwesome has gained a lot more icons, but now also some paid pro features.

So we can think about whether we would like to migrate to a more community-based project. I personally don't have a strong opinion.

I think we can make a decision here based on the amount and selection of icons the different projects offer. FontAwesome has gained a lot more icons, but now also some paid pro features. So we can think about whether we would like to migrate to a more community-based project. I personally don't have a strong opinion.
max.mehl added this to the Hackathon1905 milestone 2019-05-22 10:15:34 +00:00
mweimann self-assigned this 2019-05-26 10:45:58 +00:00
Member

The license from Font Awesome is okay for us. If there is no real need to change that I would close this issue soon.

The license from Font Awesome is okay for us. If there is no real need to change that I would close this issue soon.
Author
Owner

Yep, makes sense, thanks for digging this up :)

Yep, makes sense, thanks for digging this up :)
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Milestone
No Assignees
3 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: FSFE/fsfe-website#217
No description provided.