At some point in time news/2003/news-20030602-01.??.xhtml was presumably in about/reports/es-2003.??.xhtml
I see to options to resolve this:
* #1809
* #1810
OK wow, these link do not make sense at all. All link to the file itself.
I think, the intent was to link to the footnote. For this, the links in the text should have an id for back-reference, see e.g. this file.
But this here is an extremely old page. Therefore, to save us this hassle, may I ask you to remove all these links to the file itself? It's still functional this way, we just remove a (non-working) back-reference to the text.
OK wow, these link do not make sense at all. All link to the file itself.
I think, the intent was to link to the footnote. For this, the links in the text should have an id for back-reference, see e.g. [this file](https://git.fsfe.org/FSFE/fsfe-website/src/branch/master/activities/android/flashingdevices.en.xhtml).
But this here is an extremely old page. Therefore, to save us this hassle, may I ask you to remove all these links to the file itself? It's still functional this way, we just remove a (non-working) back-reference to the text.
At some point in time news/2003/news-20030602-01.??.xhtml was presumably in about/reports/es-2003.??.xhtml
I see to options to resolve this:
OK wow, these link do not make sense at all. All link to the file itself.
I think, the intent was to link to the footnote. For this, the links in the text should have an id for back-reference, see e.g. this file.
But this here is an extremely old page. Therefore, to save us this hassle, may I ask you to remove all these links to the file itself? It's still functional this way, we just remove a (non-working) back-reference to the text.
#1809 fixed this, right? So this issue could be closed?
Yes, thanks for the reminder.