Update Router Freedom pages #1074

Merged
max.mehl merged 4 commits from lucas.lasota/fsfe-website:new-router-freedom into master 2019-10-07 09:57:06 +00:00
Member

Hello,

I am submitting the new version of the Router Freedom page. After the review, if everything is ok, please merge.

Thank you!

Lucas

Hello, I am submitting the new version of the Router Freedom page. After the review, if everything is ok, please merge. Thank you! Lucas
max.mehl requested changes 2019-09-23 13:37:46 +00:00
max.mehl left a comment
Owner

Some suggestions, otherwise good. Thank you!

Some suggestions, otherwise good. Thank you!
@ -27,0 +31,4 @@
<p>However, many ISP across Europe do not comply with the regulation yet, imposing their own routers to consumers in a clearly contradiction with the Net Neutrality principle. Their argumentation concerns the location of the network termination point (NTP), an arbitrary definition between the limits of the users private and ISPs network equipment. They introduced a debate to determine whether the NTP would be located inside the end-user domain, so they can use their own modem and router, or the NTP would be part of the domain of the network operator, so end-users cannot use their own router with a private modem. In this case, the users should use the ISP's router.</p>
<div class="image"> <img src="/picturebase/routers/ntp-transp.png" alt="Network Termination Point"/></div>
Owner
  1. The path of the image does not seem to be right
  2. Please use the recommended syntax for including images:
<figure>
  <img
      src="https://hroy.eu/images/fsfe_ecm-group_pic/2013-09-ECM-group-picture.JPG"
      alt="group picture!"/>
  <figcaption>
    This is a picture from the Group coordinators meeting<br/>
    Berlin, September 2013
  </figcaption>
</figure>
1. The path of the image does not seem to be right 2. Please use the recommended syntax for including images: ``` <figure> <img src="https://hroy.eu/images/fsfe_ecm-group_pic/2013-09-ECM-group-picture.JPG" alt="group picture!"/> <figcaption> This is a picture from the Group coordinators meeting<br/> Berlin, September 2013 </figcaption> </figure> ```
Author
Member

Fixed, thanks for clarifying that.

Fixed, thanks for clarifying that.
@ -39,0 +39,4 @@
<p>In order to protect this freedom, the <a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.L_.2015.310.01.0001.01.ENG">article 3(1) of the Net Neutrality Directive</a> establishes that the enforcement of the respective open internet rules is task for the National Regulatory Authorities (NRAs) of each European country. They must check the application of the Directives rules accordingly to the technical guidelines of the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC).</p>
<p>However, the awareness for such fundamental topic is still <a href="https://fsfe.org/activities/routers/timeline.html">very low</a> across Europe. Users are not being consciously informed about the risks of not having the freedom to choose their own equipment. It is unacceptable to limit Router Freedom on the basis of a arbitrary definition that only benefits ISPs and subjugates users to a very unfair and submissive situation.</p>
Owner

Could you explain why we link to the timeline here when it comes to the awareness?

Could you explain why we link to the timeline here when it comes to the awareness?
Author
Member

It was a bug. Inserted the right link to the wiki. Thanks!

It was a bug. Inserted the right link to the wiki. Thanks!
@ -39,2 +47,4 @@
<p>The infringement of the Router Freedom may happen by different restrictions, such as:</p>
<ol>
Owner

I would suggest to make this an unordered list since there is no weighting between the points. So <ul> instead of <ol>

I would suggest to make this an unordered list since there is no weighting between the points. So `<ul>` instead of `<ol>`
Author
Member

Done!

Done!
@ -99,3 +95,2 @@
<ul>
<li><a href="/activities/routers/timeline.html">Timeline of compulsory routers</a></li>
<li><a href="https://wiki.fsfe.org/Activities/CompulsoryRouters/Implementation/Germany">Status of the new law's implementation in Germany</a></li>
<li><a href="https://wiki.fsfe.org/Activities/CompulsoryRouters/">Router Freedom wiki page</a></li>
Owner

Please think of a more attractive name. What can people find there? Perhaps "Further information" or "Steps to get active"?

Please think of a more attractive name. What can people find there? Perhaps "Further information" or "Steps to get active"?
Author
Member

I like when we "defend rights or freedom". So I put "How to defend Router Freedom".

I like when we "defend rights or freedom". So I put "How to defend Router Freedom".
max.mehl changed title from new-router-freedom to Update Router Freedom pages 2019-09-24 13:20:38 +00:00
Author
Member

Fixed the spotted bugs and implemented the suggestions. Thank you, Max!

Fixed the spotted bugs and implemented the suggestions. Thank you, Max!
Owner

Sorry, just got around to review the changes.

I wonder why your last commit removed the paragraph starting with <p>In order to protect this freedom, the <a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.L_.2015.310.01.0001.01.ENG">article 3(1) of the Net Neutrality Directive</a>.....

Was that an accident?

Sorry, just got around to review the changes. I wonder why your last commit removed the paragraph starting with `<p>In order to protect this freedom, the <a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.L_.2015.310.01.0001.01.ENG">article 3(1) of the Net Neutrality Directive</a>....`. Was that an accident?
Author
Member

After a general review, I realized that this paragraph was doubled in the code. That's why I deleted it :)

After a general review, I realized that this paragraph was doubled in the code. That's why I deleted it :)
max.mehl approved these changes 2019-10-07 09:56:39 +00:00
max.mehl closed this pull request 2019-10-07 09:57:05 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No description provided.