Compare commits

..

2 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
f65edc3f31 Merge pull request 'adding CRA news item' (#3592) from news-20230719-02 into master
All checks were successful
continuous-integration/drone/push Build is passing
Reviewed-on: #3592
2023-07-19 08:19:44 +00:00
b266888530 adding CRA news item
All checks were successful
continuous-integration/drone/pr Build is passing
2023-07-19 10:20:49 +02:00

View File

@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<html newsdate="2023-07-19">
<version>1</version>
<head>
<title>Cyber Resilience Act &amp; Free Software: Parliament waters down its own position</title>
</head>
<body>
<h1>Cyber Resilience Act &amp; Free Software: Parliament waters down its own position</h1>
<p>The European Parliament today voted on its position on the Cyber
Resilience Act (CRA). While the position improves on the Commission's
exemption to protect Free Software, it fails to introduce
a proper protection . We call on the institutions to put the burden of
liability only on those who significantly financially benefit from the
market, while protecting developers and non-profit work.</p>
<figure>
<img src="https://pics.fsfe.org/uploads/medium/89/bf/a96f8ded8b44f6e7de3097c14d04.jpg"
alt="Two computer screens showing some code"/>
</figure>
<p>The Commissions proposal to exclude Free Software “outside the
course of a commercial activity” would fail to address a large part of
software that will not be covered but is deployed. At the same time,
smaller and non-profit projects would be harmed as they would have to
bear major costs.</p>
<p>Therefore we have already proposed a solution that will lead to more security while safeguarding Free Software:</p>
<ol>
<li>Liability should be shifted to those <strong>deploying</strong> Free Software instead of those <strong>developing</strong> Free Software and</li>
<li>Those who significantly financially benefit from this deployment should make sure the software becomes CE-compliant</li>
</ol>
<p>While the Internal Market and Consumer Protection Committee (IMCO),
a committee for opinion in CRA, backed our demand and voted for the
protection of Free Software developers in the Cyber Resilience Act, the
Committee on Industry, Research and Energy (ITRE) introduced less far
reaching protections with today's vote. Regular corporate donations or contributions by corporate employees to a project could turn
non-profit work into a “commercial activity”, and thus lead to
liability.</p>
<blockquote>
<em>Alexander Sander, FSFE Senior Policy Consultant explains:
<italic>"With today's vote, the EU Parliament has watered down its
own position. Placing the burden of liability on small or non-profit
entities that rely on regular donations would harm the Free Software
and thus society and business alike. Due to the lack of funding and
resources to go through the proposed procedures to become CE
compliant, some of these projects might have to stop completely. We
call on the institutions to find a compromise that safeguards the Free
Software ecosystem while shifting liability to those who significantly
financially benefit from the deployment”</italic>.</em>
</blockquote>
<p>Interinstitutional negotiations will start start soon and should be concluded this year if possible. You can <a href="/news/2023/news-20230323-01.html">read more here</a>.
</p>
</body>
<tags>
<tag key="front-page"/>
<tag key="european-parliament">European Parliament</tag>
<tag key="policy">European Public Policy</tag>
<tag key="european-union">European Union</tag>
</tags>
<discussion href="https://community.fsfe.org/t/1051"/>
<image url="https://pics.fsfe.org/uploads/medium/89/bf/a96f8ded8b44f6e7de3097c14d04.jpg"
alt="Two computer screens showing some code"/>
</html>