Compare commits

..

No commits in common. "b3291152d6a2a7c6e8903e56041a1f3b00b48401" and "1f8a872c72e45781334b186102eeccd1549fc42d" have entirely different histories.

View File

@ -1,78 +0,0 @@
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<html newsdate="2023-07-19">
<version>1</version>
<head>
<title>EU Parliament intends to widen participation in the Interoperable Europe Board</title>
</head>
<body>
<h1>EU Parliament intends to widen participation in the Interoperable Europe Board</h1>
<p>Today the EU Parliaments Committee responsible for the
Interoperable Europe Act has adopted its final position. It is a step
forward towards a more inclusive Interoperable Europe Board while it
introduces clearer indicators and statistics to monitor the progress of
the Act. This position must now be upheld during the upcoming
trialogue.</p>
<figure>
<img src="https://pics.fsfe.org/uploads/medium/5a/a0/d4703ab70fffd88c6bedf3a838b8.jpg"
alt="EU Parliament photocall with the EU Parliament word in different EU languages"/>
</figure>
<p>Today the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy (ITRE) has
voted on its final text of the Interoperable Europe Act which is an
improvement of the Commission proposal. The EU Parliament has
introduced the possibility for relevant stakeholders to participate
with observer status in the Interoperable Europe Board meetings and
activities, including within those, the Free Software community.</p>
<p>Furthermore, <a href="/news/2023/news-20230323-02.html">the EU Parliament has also followed our demand</a>
suggesting the introduction of clearer objectives and statistics, that will allow to
evaluate and properly measure the progress of the activities that will
fall under this Act. Especially, when it comes to monitoring the use
and uptake of Free Software solutions among public administrations.</p>
<blockquote>
<italic>“The inclusion of relevant stakeholders and experts, such as the Free
Software community, in the Interoperable Europe Board must be part of
the final text of the Interoperable Europe Act. Likewise, proper
monitoring and evaluation procedures need to be set up to improve and
adapt the interoperability of Europe in the long run. We, therefore,
call upon the EU Parliament, especially the rapporteur Ivars Ijabs, to
safeguard its position during the upcoming trialogue and to not allow
any backwards step”</italic>, <em> mentions Lina Ceballos, FSFE Policy Project
Manager.</em>
</blockquote>
<p>The ITRE Committee has also voted with a large majority to enter the
inter-institutional negotiations. This means that the European
Parliament must now defend its position and anchor it to the final text
which will be negotiated together with the Council and Commission in
the coming weeks. This is of high importance bearing in mind that <a href="/news/2023/news-20230623-01.html">the
latest compromise text of the Council is hindering the inclusion of
relevant stakeholders</a> in the governance structure of this Act.
</p>
</body>
<tags>
<tag key="front-page"/>
<tag key="european-parliament">European Parliament</tag>
<tag key="policy">European Public Policy</tag>
<tag key="european-union">European Union</tag>
<tag key="IEA">Interoperable Europe Act</tag>
</tags>
<discussion href="https://community.fsfe.org/t/1052"/>
<image url="https://pics.fsfe.org/uploads/medium/5a/a0/d4703ab70fffd88c6bedf3a838b8.jpg"
alt="European Parliament photocall with EU Parliament words in different EU languages"/>
</html>