Compare commits
No commits in common. "ac2d7efe39429002814c76661bc9a6b8b6014f48" and "b98a0dfe1db88247851305d611d426a8a1284b3c" have entirely different histories.
ac2d7efe39
...
b98a0dfe1d
@ -1,128 +0,0 @@
|
||||
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
|
||||
<html newsdate="2023-08-24">
|
||||
<version>1</version>
|
||||
|
||||
<head>
|
||||
<title>Liability, Interoperability & Free Software in EU: what we are expecting</title>
|
||||
</head>
|
||||
|
||||
<body>
|
||||
|
||||
<h1>Liability, Interoperability & Free Software in EU: what we are expecting</h1>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>After the summer recess, EU institutions are resuming their
|
||||
activities at the end of August. In the coming months, we expect to see
|
||||
the adoption of legislation that could have an impact on Free
|
||||
Software: the Cyber Resilience Act, the Product Liability Directive, the AI
|
||||
Act, and the Interoperable Europe Act. What does all this legislation
|
||||
mean for Free Software and its community?</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<figure>
|
||||
<img src="https://pics.fsfe.org/uploads/big/278c7c68effc3bb373e271be722e93ee.jpg"
|
||||
alt="An illustration about the four freedoms that allows Software Freedom"/>
|
||||
</figure>
|
||||
|
||||
<h3>Liability and Free Software</h3>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>The EU is currently aiming to
|
||||
introduce liability rules for software, including Free Software.
|
||||
Although the main debate revolves around the Cyber Resilience Act
|
||||
(CRA), the Product Liability Directive (PLD) is just as important.
|
||||
Similar rules are being introduced in the AI Act.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>With regard to the
|
||||
CRA and the PLD, the Commission’s proposal to exclude Free Software
|
||||
“outside the course of a commercial activity” would fail to address a
|
||||
large part of the software that would not be covered but would be
|
||||
deployed. At the same time, smaller and non-profit projects would be
|
||||
harmed as they would have to bear major costs.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>For this reason, the FSFE has <a href="/news/2023/news-20230323-01.html">proposed a solution</a> that will lead to more security while safeguarding the Free Software ecosystem:</p>
|
||||
<ol>
|
||||
<li>Liability should be shifted to those deploying Free Software instead of those developing Free Software and</li>
|
||||
<li>Those who significantly financially benefit from this deployment should make sure the software becomes CE-compliant</li>
|
||||
</ol>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>Before the EU Parliament went into summer recess, we shared the
|
||||
latest news on the Cyber Resilience Act (CRA). The adoption of the
|
||||
Parliament’s position leaves a situation where <a href="/news/2023/news-20230719-01.html">Free Software developers
|
||||
are left with less far-reaching protections</a>. Regular corporate
|
||||
donations or contributions by company employees to a project could turn
|
||||
non-profit work into a “commercial activity”, and therefore lead to
|
||||
liability. The three EU institutions will now negotiate a final text,
|
||||
which is likely to be concluded this year. We call on the EU
|
||||
institutions to find a compromise that safeguards the Free Software
|
||||
ecosystem while shifting liability to those who significantly benefit
|
||||
financially from its deployment. <a href="/news/2023/news-20230323-01.html">Read more</a>.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>Similar rules are being negotiated in the Product Liability Directive (PLD), where the
|
||||
FSFE is also demanding protection for Free Software developers.
|
||||
However, the Parliament has yet to adopt its position.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>Regarding the AI Act, the EU Parliament has also adopted its final text
|
||||
by a large majority. It includes a <a href="/news/2023/news-20230614-01.html">far-reaching exemption for
|
||||
non-profit organisations and small Free Software projects up to the
|
||||
size of micro-enterprises</a>.
|
||||
Negotiations on the final text between the three institutions (also
|
||||
known as trialogue, where representatives of the Parliament, the
|
||||
Council, and the Commission meet to agree on a final text) are already
|
||||
taking place. Here the FSFE calls on the EU Parliament to defend
|
||||
its position to ensure that this regulation protects not only Free Software and
|
||||
its contributors but also consumers and customers.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
<h3>Interoperability and Free Software</h3>
|
||||
<p>With the proposed Interoperable Europe Act, the EU aims to create a dedicated legal framework on
|
||||
interoperability that will enhance cross-border digital public services
|
||||
across the Union. Since the beginning of the year, the FSFE has been
|
||||
advocating for a more inclusive governance structure in this
|
||||
legislation, where different stakeholders, including the Free Software
|
||||
community, can be part of the Interoperable Europe Board. A <a href="/news/2023/news-20230323-02.html">proper
|
||||
monitoring and evaluation process together with a dedicated budget</a> are
|
||||
also part of our demands.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>With the adoption of its final position, the EU Parliament
|
||||
has taken a step forward towards <a href="/news/2023/news-20230719-02.html">a more inclusive Board</a>, while at the
|
||||
same time introducing clearer indicators and statistics to monitor the
|
||||
progress of this legislation. This is particularly important given that
|
||||
the Council's recent compromise text still moves in the opposite
|
||||
direction by hindering the inclusion of relevant stakeholders in the
|
||||
governance structure, as we have <a href="/news/2023/news-20230623-01.html">previously highlighted</a>. Now the European
|
||||
Parliament, the Council, and the Commission will have to agree on a
|
||||
final text. The FSFE, therefore, calls on the European Parliament to
|
||||
maintain its position and not to allow any step backwards.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<strong>If you want a more thorough understanding of how the EU legislative
|
||||
process works, you can <a href="https://edri.org/files/Activistguide_V3_web.pd">check out this complete guide
|
||||
(.pdf)</a> produced by the EDRi network, of which FSFE is a member.</strong>
|
||||
|
||||
<h4>Help us continue to make our demands heard in EU policy!</h4>
|
||||
<p>At FSFE, we work to be an essential stakeholder when talking about Software Freedom
|
||||
at the EU legislative level. Our daily work contributes to
|
||||
strengthening our political advocacy and getting our demands taken into
|
||||
account. And your support makes it possible!</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>The FSFE would be nothing without our supporters. Every financial donation helps us to continue
|
||||
our daily work in public awareness, policy advocacy, and legal and
|
||||
technical work, and to strengthen our community. <a href="/donate.html">Support Software
|
||||
Freedom, support the FSFE</a>.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
</body>
|
||||
|
||||
<tags>
|
||||
<tag key="front-page"/>
|
||||
<tag key="european-union">European Union</tag>
|
||||
<tag key="policy">European Public Policy</tag>
|
||||
<tag key="IEA">Interoperable Europe Act</tag>
|
||||
<tag key="AI">Artificial Intelligence</tag>
|
||||
|
||||
</tags>
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
<discussion href="https://community.fsfe.org/t/1063"/>
|
||||
<image url="https://pics.fsfe.org/uploads/big/278c7c68effc3bb373e271be722e93ee.jpg"
|
||||
alt="An illustration about the four freedoms that allows Software Freedom"/>>
|
||||
|
||||
</html>
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user