Compare commits

..

3 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
e1f77ccd73 Merge pull request 'news20230629-IEA' (#3534) from news20230629-IEA into master
All checks were successful
continuous-integration/drone/push Build is passing
Reviewed-on: #3534
2023-06-29 07:47:33 +00:00
06e4f0c0ab adding news on IEA
All checks were successful
continuous-integration/drone/pr Build is passing
2023-06-29 09:10:35 +02:00
558a11d15f adding news item on CRA
All checks were successful
continuous-integration/drone/pr Build is passing
2023-06-29 08:48:36 +02:00
2 changed files with 168 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<html newsdate="2023-06-29">
<version>1</version>
<head>
<title>Cyber Resilience Act: First committee backs FSFE demand to protect Free Software</title>
</head>
<body>
<h1>Cyber Resilience Act: First committee backs FSFE demand to protect Free Software</h1>
<p>The Internal Market and Consumer Protection Committee (IMCO) today launched a landmark decision to protect Free Software developers in the Cyber Resilience Act (CRA).</p>
<figure>
<img src="https://pics.fsfe.org/uploads/big/d1b7eb0ca6ec38c89967dab6d3dd920b.png"
alt="Picture in shades of blue with a lock surrounded by a circle and the phrase cybersecurity."/>
</figure>
<p>
The Internal Market and Consumer Protection Committee (IMCO) today
launched a landmark decision to protect Free Software developers in the
Cyber Resilience Act (CRA). In September last year, the EU Commission
presented the CRA. The proposal to exclude Free Software “outside the
course of a commercial activity” would fail to address a large part of
software that will not be covered but is deployed. Furthermore, smaller
and non-profit projects would be harmed as they would have to bear
major costs. We, therefore, <a href="news/2023/news-20230323-01.html">proposed a solution</a>
that will lead to more security while safeguarding the Free Software ecosystem:</p>
<ol>
<li>Liability should be shifted to those deploying Free Software instead of those developing Free Software and</li>
<li>Those who significantly financially benefit from this deployment should make sure the software becomes CE-compliant</li>
</ol>
<blockquote>
<em>Alexander Sander, FSFE Senior Policy Consultant explains:
<italic>"The Internal Market and Consumer Protection Committee, a
committee for opinion in CRA, has backed our demand and voted for the
protection of Free Software developers in the Cyber Resilience Act. We
are particularly delighted with the transfer of those protections into
an article and the precise description of how Free Software should be
protected in the future. The lead committee is now called upon to
follow this vote"</italic>.
</em>
</blockquote>
<p>Shortly, the leading committee, Committee on Industry, Research and
Energy (ITRE), will define its position and submit it to the plenary
for a vote. After that, the trialogue with Parliament, Council and
Commission will begin in order to reach a final agreement. At the same
time, similar rules are being negotiated in the Product Liability
Directive (PLD). Here, too, FSFE is calling for <a href="/news/2023/news-20230323-01.html)">the protection of
developers of Free Software</a>. We thank all those organisations and individuals contributing to this position and making sure to safeguard Free Software in those files.
</p>
</body>
<tags>
<tag key="front-page"/>
<tag key="european-parliament">European Parliament</tag>
<tag key="policy">European Public Policy</tag>
<tag key="european-union">European Union</tag>
</tags>
<discussion href="https://community.fsfe.org/t/1045"/>
<image url="https://pics.fsfe.org/uploads/big/d1b7eb0ca6ec38c89967dab6d3dd920b.png"
alt="Picture in shades of blue with a lock surrounded by a circle and the phrase cybersecurity."/>
</html>

View File

@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<html newsdate="2023-06-29">
<version>1</version>
<head>
<title>IEA: EU Parliament advances in stengthenting the role of Free Software, yet needs more to improve</title>
</head>
<body>
<h1>IEA: EU Parliament advances in stengthenting the role of Free Software, yet needs more to improve</h1>
<p>The two EP Committees for opinion, IMCO and LIBE, have today
adopted their texts on the Interoperable Europe Act. While both
recognise the importance of Free Software for this regulation, the
inclusion of the Free Software community in the Board remains
uncertain. The wording on proper monitoring and evaluation goes in the
right direction.</p>
<figure>
<img src="https://pics.fsfe.org/uploads/medium/b0/1a/fd4cdcfc9469a641626b5eb71aa4.jpg"
alt="European building with the European Parliament symbol"/>
</figure>
<p>The Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection (IMCO)
and the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (LIBE)
have today adopted by a large majority their opinions on the
Interoperable Europe Act.</p>
<p>The IMCO Committee, following some of <a
href="/news/2023/news-20230323-02.html">our demands</a> has highlighted
the need for public bodies and institutions to prioritise the use of
Free Software in order to support the creation of reusable solutions.
Furthermore, it has also recognised our demand for clearer objectives
and indicators to measure its achievement. Moreover, it has included
measures to report and monitor the number of Free Software solutions
developed and adopted by the public sector within the scope of the
Regulation.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, no amendments to include more stakeholders in the
Interoperable Europe Board were adopted, apart from the proposal to
include the European Parliament as an observer. Therefore it is now up
to the lead Committee on Industry, Research and Energy (ITRE) to take
further steps forward in the direction of enriching the Board.</p>
<p>On the other hand, the LIBE Committee has briefly included the wording to
encourage Free Software solutions when it comes to enhancing
transparency in the processing of personal data within the scope of
this regulation. However, this wording still needs to be improved by
more firmly prioritising the use of Free Software for such purpose.
</p>
<blockquote>
<em>Lina Ceballos, FSFE Project Manager states: <italic>“We welcome
that the European Parliament has taken notice of some of our demands,
especially when it comes to proper monitoring and evaluation. However,
there is yet the need to include more stakeholders in the governance.
Thus we urge decision makers to recognise the role that the Free
Software community could play in the Interoperable
Board"</italic>.</em>
</blockquote>
<p>In the coming weeks, the Committee on Industry, Research and Energiy
(ITRE) will agree on its text, which will most likely be voted in
plenary after the summer break, and then enter into the
inter-institutional negotiations. We call upon the decision makers to
not only anchor the progress that IMCO and LIBE have achieved with its
opinion but also to undertake the actions needed for a more inclusive
governance approach by including the Free Software community as part of
the Interoperable Europe Board. This is also true for the Council, that
<a href="/news/2023/news-20230623-01.html">wants to exclude relevant
stakeholders from contributing to an Interoperable Europe</a>. </p>
</body>
<tags>
<tag key="front-page"/>
<tag key="european-parliament">European Parliament</tag>
<tag key="policy">European Public Policy</tag>
<tag key="european-union">European Union</tag>
<tag key="IEA">Interoperable Europe Act</tag>
</tags>
<discussion href="https://community.fsfe.org/t/1044"/>
<image url="https://pics.fsfe.org/uploads/medium/b0/1a/fd4cdcfc9469a641626b5eb71aa4.jpg"
alt="European building with the European Parliament symbol"/>
</html>