Compare commits

...

3 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
1e09d22d34 Merge pull request 'adding news item on rooting' (#3629) from news-20230807 into master
All checks were successful
continuous-integration/drone/push Build is passing
Reviewed-on: #3629
2023-08-07 11:18:57 +00:00
4ee51ed8c9 adding news item on rooting
All checks were successful
continuous-integration/drone/pr Build is passing
2023-08-07 13:20:32 +02:00
0b2716a069 adding news item on rooting
Some checks failed
continuous-integration/drone/pr Build is failing
2023-08-07 13:15:16 +02:00

View File

@ -0,0 +1,150 @@
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<html newsdate="2023-08-07">
<version>1</version>
<head>
<title>Unleash the potential of your phone: Rooting your device does not void its warranty</title>
</head>
<body>
<h1>Unleash the potential of your phone: Rooting your device does not void its warranty</h1>
<p>As users we sometimes face the issue of rooting our devices. We may
want to <a href="/fsfe.org/activities/android/">regain control of our
device</a> or we may want to <a
href="/activities/upcyclingandroid/upcyclingandroid.html">keep using a
device with an outdated operating system</a>. But we are afraid of losing
our legal warranty. Lets be clear: Just rooting your device and
installing new software will not void the statutory warranty.</p>
<figure>
<img src="https://pics.fsfe.org/uploads/medium/53/e1/dbab450c6284ac9ec94d85fbafce.jpg"
alt="An illustration about the right to repair"/>
<figcaption>CC-BY-NC-SA BY <a href="http://rahak.net/work.html">Rahak</a></figcaption>
</figure>
<p>EU law stipulates that consumers should have a minimum 2-year
guarantee (statutory warranty) when acquiring a new device. However,
in the past few years, vendors have tended to include specific clauses
stating that if the consumer changes the device, the warranty will be
void. That is why the question of whether rooting or flashing a device
voids the statutory warranty is quite recurrent. <strong><u>The answer is no</u></strong>.</p>
<p>The FSFE has previously addressed this <a
href="/activities/android/flashingdevices.html">issue</a>. In short, if
you
acquire a device as a consumer in the European Union, the mere fact
that you have modified or changed the software of your device by
rooting or flashing it is not a sufficient reason to void your
statutory warranty. </p>
<p>Since our previous discussion of this topic, the <a
href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32019L0771">Sale
of Goods
Directive 2019/771 (the SGD)</a> was enacted, repealing the previous
1999/44/CE Directive, which provided the original statutory warranty.
The SGD deals with the contract of sale between a consumer and a
seller, and it entered into force on June 11, 2019, applying its
provisions to any contract concluded after January 1, 2022.<a href="#section1">[1]</a> </p>
<h3>Reasons to root your device</h3>
<p>Rooting the phone and installing Free Software <a
href="/activities/upcyclingandroid/upcyclingandroid.html">extends the
lifespan of the device</a>. Most phone devices are not controlled by the users, but by the manufacturer
and the operator of the telephone network. The software that runs on them is not entirely Free Software.
Even Android phones ship with non-free software and proprietary add-ons
that often work <a href="/activities/android/android.html">against the full interest of the user</a>.
</p>
<p>
Through rooting or flashing a device, the user can take complete
control over it. When consumers buy a phone they buy the physical
aspects of the phone. They should be free to choose which
software should be on their phone without having the fear of losing
the warranty. Monopolies hurt fair competition and consumers.
Companies/vendors regulating operating systems which provide critical online
services, results in limiting user choice and freedom. <a
href="/activities/deviceneutrality/index.html">The devices
should therefore be neutral</a> so as to enable the users to freely choose
any software on their phones without any conditions.
</p>
<h3>The SGD is on your side</h3>
<p>At the FSFE we have already analyzed <a
href="/activities/upcyclingandroid/is-flashing-legal.html">the
changes brought in by the SGD</a> and how they impact rooting and
the statutory warranty.</p>
<p>The SGD covers goods with digital content, including smartphones,
smart TVs, smart watches, and fitness trackers<a href="#section2">[2]</a>. All such goods covered
under the SGD must have a <strong>mandatory two-year warranty</strong><a
href="#section3">[3]</a> from the seller
that the product will meet the purposes for which products of the same
type would normally be used. One of the main changes enacted by the SGD
is the reverse burden of proof. This means that if your device becomes
defective <strong>within one year</strong><a href="#section4">[4]</a>,
it is presumed that the defect was present
all along, and you do not need to prove anything; instead, it is the
seller who has to prove that this is not the case. This period was six
months under the previous 1999/44/CE Directive. </p>
<p>There are currently no instances of litigated cases about warranty
issues when rooting, flashing, or jailbreaking smartphones in Europe,
nor has there been a rule or provision on this issue. This makes the
legality of such acts unclear. So, you can root your phone, but if you
wish to keep the warranty intact without any problems, then reverse the
root to the stock operating system and check if everything was undone.
If the stock OS functions as it should, then you do not have an issue.
</p>
<h3>Future Updates to Keep An Eye On</h3>
<p>Lastly, you should know that the SGD is relatively new as it came
into effect in January 2022. The European Commission, under the
Sustainable Consumption of Goods-Promoting Repair and Reuse Programme,
has already introduced a proposal for a directive to make some changes
to the SGD to accommodate repairing obligations on the producers and to
encourage consumers to choose repair over replacement if there is a
possibility. This can also have an impact on the subject matter of this
article.</p>
<p>The FSFE will keep you updated on this issue as and when there are more developments.</p>
<footer>
<hr style="width:50%;text-align:left;margin-left:0"></hr>
<p id="section1"><small>[1] Article 23 of Directive 2019\771</small></p>
<p id="section2"><small>[2] Recitals 12, 13, 14, 15 and Article 2 of Directive 2019\771</small></p>
<p id="section3"><small>[3] Article 10 of Directive 2019\771</small></p>
<p id="section4"><small>[4] Article 11 of Directive 2019\771</small></p>
</footer>
</body>
<tags>
<tag key="front-page"/>
<tag key="legal">Legal</tag>
<tag key="upcyclingandroid">Upcycling Android</tag>
<tag key="sustainability">Sustainability</tag>
<tag key="deviceneutrality">Device Neutrality</tag>
</tags>
<discussion href="https://community.fsfe.org/t/1058"/>
<image url="https://pics.fsfe.org/uploads/medium/53/e1/dbab450c6284ac9ec94d85fbafce.jpg"
alt="An illustration about the right to repair"/>
</html>