Fixed typo's, thanks to Federico Bruni, touched up to date translations

svn path=/trunk/; revision=12340

projects/os/ps.en.xhtml

@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
 
 <p>This debate got a lot quieter with the rejection of the software
   patent directive in 2005. Its place in the headlines was taken by
-  other debates, such as standardisaton. Open Standards have been a
+  other debates, such as standardisation. Open Standards have been a
   buzzword for years, but never has this term been discussed more
   intensively.</p>
 
@@ -352,7 +352,7 @@
 
 <p>In standards, the situation is somewhat similar. If patents are
   part of a standard, only an implementation that is covered by the
-  patents provides an effective antitdote to monopolisation. Having to
+  patents provides an effective antidote to monopolisation. Having to
   circumvent patents will generally break standards compliance and harm the
   public benefit that is the driving force behind standardisation.</p>
 
@@ -375,7 +375,7 @@
 
 <p>There are also cases where certain standardisation organisations,
   e.g. the <a href="http://www.iso.org">International Organisation for
-  Standardisation</a> (ISO) have a priviledged position with
+  Standardisation</a> (ISO) have a privileged position with
   governments for procurement decisions. Due to patents and
   insufficient (F)RAND conditions, not all standards priviledged in
   this way can be implemented by all legitimate market participants
@@ -441,7 +441,7 @@ order to preserve its business."</em></quote>
   Non-Discriminatory, the resulting fees may easily add up to 50% or
   more of the cost for the end product. So all patent holders should
   commit ex-ante that the aggregate licensing cost for all patents
-  should be reasonable. As an example, Mr Frain cited that in Nokias
+  should be reasonable. As an example, Mr Frain cited that in Nokia's
   view, the patent licensing fees on the communication technology for
   mobile phones should be below 10% per handset.</p>
 
@@ -454,7 +454,7 @@ order to preserve its business."</em></quote>
   non-discrimination against legitimate business models, and the ART+P
   approach also has the practical weakness that convergence joins more
   than one kind of technology per device, so the total patent
-  royalties on a smart phone may still reach 50% even if the cost for
+  royalties on a smart phone may still reach 50% even if the costs for
   GSM &amp; Co are limited to 10%. But even these 10% can be
   considerable for laptops with included UMTS modems, or embedded
   devices, an area in which the profit margins are typically far below

projects/os/ps.nl.xhtml

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
 
     <p align="right">
       [ <a href="ps.en.pdf">PDF versie (94k) (originele Engelse
-      versie</a> ]
+      versie)</a> ]
     </p>
 
     <h1>Een evenwichtsonderzoek:<br />Standardisatie en patenten</h1>