From fd8bb7541bdda2d81c0b9fe8b45462a0acf40248 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: rolf_camps Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 20:14:24 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Fixed typo's, thanks to Federico Bruni, touched up to date translations svn path=/trunk/; revision=12340 --- projects/os/ps.en.xhtml | 10 +++++----- projects/os/ps.nl.xhtml | 2 +- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/projects/os/ps.en.xhtml b/projects/os/ps.en.xhtml index 94f40a92f9..7b3382271b 100644 --- a/projects/os/ps.en.xhtml +++ b/projects/os/ps.en.xhtml @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@

This debate got a lot quieter with the rejection of the software patent directive in 2005. Its place in the headlines was taken by - other debates, such as standardisaton. Open Standards have been a + other debates, such as standardisation. Open Standards have been a buzzword for years, but never has this term been discussed more intensively.

@@ -352,7 +352,7 @@

In standards, the situation is somewhat similar. If patents are part of a standard, only an implementation that is covered by the - patents provides an effective antitdote to monopolisation. Having to + patents provides an effective antidote to monopolisation. Having to circumvent patents will generally break standards compliance and harm the public benefit that is the driving force behind standardisation.

@@ -375,7 +375,7 @@

There are also cases where certain standardisation organisations, e.g. the International Organisation for - Standardisation (ISO) have a priviledged position with + Standardisation (ISO) have a privileged position with governments for procurement decisions. Due to patents and insufficient (F)RAND conditions, not all standards priviledged in this way can be implemented by all legitimate market participants @@ -441,7 +441,7 @@ order to preserve its business." Non-Discriminatory, the resulting fees may easily add up to 50% or more of the cost for the end product. So all patent holders should commit ex-ante that the aggregate licensing cost for all patents - should be reasonable. As an example, Mr Frain cited that in Nokias + should be reasonable. As an example, Mr Frain cited that in Nokia's view, the patent licensing fees on the communication technology for mobile phones should be below 10% per handset.

@@ -454,7 +454,7 @@ order to preserve its business." non-discrimination against legitimate business models, and the ART+P approach also has the practical weakness that convergence joins more than one kind of technology per device, so the total patent - royalties on a smart phone may still reach 50% even if the cost for + royalties on a smart phone may still reach 50% even if the costs for GSM & Co are limited to 10%. But even these 10% can be considerable for laptops with included UMTS modems, or embedded devices, an area in which the profit margins are typically far below diff --git a/projects/os/ps.nl.xhtml b/projects/os/ps.nl.xhtml index 69321ae6ed..1785f2ebb2 100644 --- a/projects/os/ps.nl.xhtml +++ b/projects/os/ps.nl.xhtml @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@

[ PDF versie (94k) (originele Engelse - versie ] + versie) ]

Een evenwichtsonderzoek:
Standardisatie en patenten