fix footer numbering

svn path=/trunk/; revision=26446
This commit is contained in:
Björn Schießle 2013-11-01 10:22:04 +00:00
parent 4ac804239b
commit eacd9c7076

View File

@ -19,8 +19,8 @@ blog.fsfe.org/hugo/why-free-software-matters-for-society-draft.
<p>The price we are paying for the predominance of the proprietary software
approach is high. Because the proprietary software paradigm has a strong,
system-inherent monopolising tendency [<A NAME="ref5"
HREF="#5">5</A>] and software permeates all areas of
system-inherent monopolising tendency [<A NAME="ref1"
HREF="#1">1</A>] and software permeates all areas of
economy, northern economies suffer and southern countries are given the
choice between exclusion or co-suffering in total dependence. That is why
breaking up Microsoft without a change in paradigm would not improve the
@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ blog.fsfe.org/hugo/why-free-software-matters-for-society-draft.
<p>For all central cultural techniques, we have to ask who should be put in
control of it. Proprietary software puts large northern multinationals in
control. [<A NAME="ref6" HREF="#6">6</A>] Free Software
control. [<A NAME="ref2" HREF="#2">2</A>] Free Software
makes this cultural technique equally available to all the peoples.</p>
<h3>Human Rights</h3>
@ -83,19 +83,19 @@ blog.fsfe.org/hugo/why-free-software-matters-for-society-draft.
Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), both implementations of the "The World
Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Copyright Treaty" (December 1996).
While the DMCA already gained notoriety for enabling censorship of
Scientology-critical sites in the United States, [<A NAME="ref7"
HREF="#7">7</A>] the German implementation of the EUCD is
Scientology-critical sites in the United States, [<A NAME="ref3"
HREF="#3">3</A>] the German implementation of the EUCD is
silently making the right to fair use inaccessible. Although laws clearly
state that customers have the right to copy a CD for their car stereo or even
a friend, those who exercise this right on so-called "copy protected" CDs
or on any DVD now risk punishment. And if you think this is where it ends,
feel free to read the EFF paper on so-called "Trusted Computing" (TC). [<A
NAME="ref8" HREF="#8">8</A>] </p>
NAME="ref4" HREF="#4">4</A>] </p>
<p>Proprietary software effectively puts an area that was previously governed
by democratically elected representatives into the hand of corporations,
therefore establishing technocracy. [<A NAME="ref9"
HREF="#9">9</A>] </p>
therefore establishing technocracy. [<A NAME="ref5"
HREF="#5">5</A>] </p>
<h3>Summary</h3>
@ -110,21 +110,21 @@ blog.fsfe.org/hugo/why-free-software-matters-for-society-draft.
<h3>References</h3>
<p>[<A NAME="5" HREF="#ref5">5</A>] Explanation of these mechanisms will gladly be provided, if of interest.</p>
<p>[<A NAME="1" HREF="#ref1">1</A>] Explanation of these mechanisms will gladly be provided, if of interest.</p>
<p>[<A NAME="6" HREF="#ref6">6</A>] Side note: Which should
<p>[<A NAME="2" HREF="#ref2">2</A>] Side note: Which should
not be understood as a good thing for people in the northern countries. It is
not.</p>
<p>[<A NAME="7" HREF="#ref7">7</A>] For reference, see <code class="footnote">
<p>[<A NAME="3" HREF="#ref3">3</A>] For reference, see <code class="footnote">
<A NAME="ref11"
HREF="http://www-camlaw.rutgers.edu/publications/law-religion/scientology.htm">http://www-camlaw.rutgers.edu/publications/law-religion/scientology.htm</A></code>
(not available any more)</p>
<p>[<A NAME="8" HREF="#ref8">8</A>] <code class="footnote">
<p>[<A NAME="4" HREF="#ref4">4</A>] <code class="footnote">
<A NAME="ref13" HREF="http://www.eff.org/files/20031001_tc.pdf">http://www.eff.org/files/20031001_tc.pdf</A></code></p>
<p>[<A NAME="9" HREF="#ref9">9</A>] Technocracy: "Government by technicians or management of society by technical experts." (Merriam Webster Dictionary)</p>
<p>[<A NAME="5" HREF="#ref5">5</A>] Technocracy: "Government by technicians or management of society by technical experts." (Merriam Webster Dictionary)</p>
</body>