FSFE/fsfe-website
27
33
Fork 93
Code Issues 63 Pull Requests 18 Wiki Activity

cleanup society folder

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Matthias Kirschner
2020-04-17 21:10:32 +02:00
committed by max.mehl
parent a463a6e0f2
commit c90e8634fb
8 changed files with 0 additions and 522 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

74
freesoftware/society/facebooks-open-graph.el.xhtml
View File

@@ -1,74 +0,0 @@
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<html>
<version>1</version>
<head>
<title>Το OpenGraph του Facebook: Ώρα να φεύγουμε</title>
</head>
<body id="article">
<p id="category">
<a href="/freesoftware/freesoftware.html">Ελεύθερο Λογισμικό</a>
</p>
<h1>Το OpenGraph του Facebook: Ώρα να φεύγουμε</h1>
<p> Χθες, ο ιδρυτής και CEO του Facebook Mark Zuckerberg ανακοίνωσε το
Next Big Thing (TM) για το Facebook: το OpenGraph. Σε ένα τυπικά χλιδάτο
άρθρο, το Wired το συνοψίζει στο εξής: </p>
<blockquote>«μια πρωτοβουλία που θα επιτρέψει σε χιλιάδες προγραμματιστές
να κατασκευάζουν κοινωνικές εφαρμογές στενά συνυφασμένες με το σύστημα του
Facebook, πολύ περισσότερο από ότι είναι με την υφιστάμενη πλατφόρμα. Εφαρμογές
πολυμέσων σε κατηγορίες όπως μουσική, ειδήσεις και βίντεο δεν θα είναι μόνο
σε θέση να προσθέτουν αμέσως αξία στο περιεχόμενο καθώς οι φίλοι διαμοιράζονται
ό,τι αναγιγνώσκουν και παρακολουθούν οπτικά και ηχητικά, αλλά το ίδιο το
μέσο θα εμφανίζεται ως κομμάτι του Facebook. Αν και οι προφανείς εφαρμογές
για τους εταίρους του Facebook είναι τα πολυμέσα, το Facebook ελπίζει να
γραφτούν προγράμματα που θα αναμιγνύονται σε όποια πτυχή της ζωής μπορεί κανείς
να φανταστεί».</blockquote>
<p>Το αποτέλεσμα το οποίο ο Zuckerberg εύχεται είναι ότι οι χρήστες θα
εναποθέτουν μια λεπτομερή καταγραφή κάθε πτυχής της ζωής τους στους εξυπηρετητές
του Facebook. Σίγουρα, θα μοιράζεσαι εκείνες τις λεπτομέρειες με τους «φίλους»
σου· αλλά στο τέλος, θα είναι το Facebook εκείνο που θα αποφασίζει ποιος
μπορεί να δει τις λεπτομέρειες αυτές.</p>
<p>Η υπηρεσία μπορεί να είναι εύχρηστη. Αλλά στην πράξη το Facebook θα
λειτουργεί το δικό του ιδιωτικό Διαδίκτυο.</p>
<p>Μόνο που δεν θα πρόκειται για κάτι όπως το Διαδίκτυο. Το Διαδίκτυο
είναι <a href ="http://el.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet">αποκεντρωμένο</a>.
Δεν υπάρχει μοναδικό σημείο φραγής το οποίο να μπορεί να ελεγχθεί και να
λογοκριθεί. Όπως είπε ο John Gilmore το 1993, το Διαδίκτυο «ερμηνεύει τη
λογοκρισία ως βλάβη και βρίσκει εναλλακτικές διαδρομές για να την αποφύγει».</p>
<p style="text-align:center">
<img src="http://blogs.fsfe.org/gerloff/files/2011/09/centralized.facebook.png" border="0" alt="Centralised system: Facebook decides who you can talk to, and what you can say" width="166" lenght="250"/>
<img src="http://blogs.fsfe.org/gerloff/files/2011/09/distributed.you-yourfriends.png" border="0" alt="Distributed system: You decide" width="166" lenght="250"/>
</p>
<p style="text-align:center">
<i>Συγκεντρωτικό σύστημα: το Facebook αποφασίζει με ποιον μπορείς να
μιλήσεις και τι μπορείς να του πεις. Κατανεμημένο σύστημα: Εσύ αποφασίζεις </i>
</p>
<p>Έτσι και εσύ.</p>
<p>Υπάρχουν πολλά έργα που σχεδιάζουν τα ίδια πράγματα που κάνει το
Facebook, και πολλά άλλα. Η κρίσιμη διαφορά είναι ότι τα έργα αυτά σου δίνουν
τον έλεγχο. Αυτή είναι η βασική ιδέα της ελευθερίας στο λογισμικό: Ότι θα
πρέπει να έχεις τον έλεγχο των δικών σου υπολογιστικών μέσων.</p>
<p>Στο wiki της Κοινότητας, υπάρχει
<a href="https://wiki.fsfe.org/CloudComputing">μια λίστα με πολλά από αυτά τα
έργα</a>. Δοκιμάστε τα. Δείτε αν μπορείτε να συμβάλλετε σε κάποιο από αυτά.
Ή αν δεν σας αρέσει κανένα, ίσως να ξεκινούσατε κάποιο δικό σας. Απλά
<a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/federatedsocialweb/">εξασφαλίστε
ότι θα μπορεί να επικοινωνεί με τα άλλα</a>. Α, και αν γνωρίζετε άλλα έργα
Ελεύθερου Λογισμικού που κατασκευάζουν κατανεμημένα συστήματα, προσθέστε τα
στη λίστα.</p>
<p>Έτσι ξεκινήστε να χρησιμοποιείτε τουλάχιστον ένα από τα έργα αυτά
σήμερα. Το χρωστάτε στον εαυτό σας.</p>
<p>Επειδή, από την άποψη του Facebook, δεν είστε ο πελάτης.
Είστε το προϊόν.</p>
</body>
<timestamp>$Date: 2011-10-10 15:56:18 +0100 (Mon, 23 May 2010) $ $Author: Karsten Gerloff$</timestamp>
<author id="gerloff" />
<date>
<original content="2011-10-10" />
</date>
</html>

41
freesoftware/society/facebooks-open-graph.en.xhtml
View File

@@ -1,41 +0,0 @@
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<html>
<version>1</version>
<head>
<title>Facebook’s OpenGraph: Time to get out</title>
</head>
<body id="article">
<p id="category">
<a href="/freesoftware/freesoftware.html">Free Software</a>
</p>
<h1>Facebook’s OpenGraph: Time to get out</h1>
<p> Yesterday, Facebook founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg announced the Next Big Thing (TM) for Facebook: OpenGraph. In a typically glowing article, Wired sums it up as follows: </p>
<blockquote>"an initiative that will allow thousands of developers to make social applications tightly woven into the Facebook system, much more so than with the existing platform. Media applications in categories like music, news, and video will not only be able to instantly make their content more valuable as friends share what they’re reading, watching and listening to with each other, but the media itself will seem to be part of Facebook. Though media apps are prominent among the F8 launch partners, however, Facebook expects people to write programs that involve every imaginable aspect of life".</blockquote>
<p>The result Zuckerberg is hoping for is that people will leave a detailed record of every aspect of their lives on Facebook’s servers. Sure, you will be sharing thosed details with your “friends”; but in the end, it will always be Facebook that determines who can see those details.</p>
<p>The service may be convenient. But in effect, Facebook will be acting as its own private Internet.</p>
<p>Only that it won’t be like the Internet. The Internet is <a href ="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet">decentralised</a>. There’s no single choke point where it can be controlled and censored. As John Gilmore said in 1993, the Internet “interprets censorship as damage and routes around it.”</p>
<p style="text-align:center">
<img src="http://blogs.fsfe.org/gerloff/files/2011/09/centralized.facebook.png" border="0" alt="Centralised system: Facebook decides who you can talk to, and what you can say" width="166" lenght="250"/>
<img src="http://blogs.fsfe.org/gerloff/files/2011/09/distributed.you-yourfriends.png" border="0" alt="Distributed system: You decide" width="166" lenght="250"/>
</p>
<p style="text-align:center">
<i>Centralised system: Facebook decides who you can talk to, and what you can say. Distributed system: You decide </i>
</p>
<p>So can you.</p>
<p>There are lots of projects out there that will do the same things that Facebook does, and much more. The crucial difference is that these projects put you in control. This is the basic idea of software freedom: That you should be able to control your own computing.</p>
<p>In the Fellowship wiki, there’s <a href="https://wiki.fsfe.org/CloudComputing">list of a lot of these projects</a>. Go try them out. See if you can contribute to one of them. Or if you don’t like any of them, perhaps you can start your own. Just <a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/federatedsocialweb/">make sure it can talk to the others</a>. Oh, and if you know of other Free Software projects building distributed systems, add them to the list.</p>
<p>So start using at least one of these projects today. You owe it to yourself.</p>
<p>Because from Facebook’s perspective, you are not the customer. You are the product.</p>
</body>
<timestamp>$Date: 2011-10-10 15:56:18 +0100 (Mon, 23 May 2010) $ $Author: Karsten Gerloff$</timestamp>
<author id="gerloff" />
<date>
<original content="2011-10-10" />
</date>
</html>

57
freesoftware/society/society.el.xhtml
View File

@@ -1,57 +0,0 @@
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<html>
<version>0</version>
<head>
<title>Το Ελεύθερο Λογισμικό στην Κοινωνία</title>
</head>
<body>
<h1>Ελεύθερο Λογισμικό, Ελεύθερη Κοινωνία</h1>
<div id="introduction">
<p> <!-- short text explaning the whys and whereabout -->
Ο πιο βασικός ορισμός μιας κοινωνίας είναι εκείνος της ομάδας
τα μέλη της οποίας σχετίζονται μεταξύ τους μέσα από οργανωμένες
σχέσεις. Οι κοινωνίες μας βασίζονται σε σύνολα αξιών θεμελιωμένα
σε διαμοιρασμένο πολιτισμό και διαμοιρασμένους θεσμούς.
Η δημοκρατία, τα ανθρώπινα δικαιώματα, η ισότητα των φύλων,
τα δικαιώματα ατόμων με ειδικές ανάγκες, η ελευθερία έκφρασης,
το ιδιωτικό απόρρητο και η ασφάλεια είναι παραδείγματα των
επιτευγμάτων των κοινωνιών μας και του τι πρέπει να διατηρηθεί.</p>
</div>
<p>Το ιδιοκτησιακό λογισμικό ναρκοθετεί τις ελευθερίες των χρηστών στον
ψηφιακό κόσμο, αλλά επίσης και η συνολική ισορροπία του συστήματος
βασίζεται σε αξίες τις οποίες το Ελεύθερο Λογισμικό - αντίθετα με το
μη-ελεύθερο - υπερασπίζει.</p>
<div class="related">
<h2>Related content</h2>
<ul>
<li><a href="/freesoftware/society/democracy.html">
Γιατί η δημοκρατική διακυβέρνηση απαιτεί Ελεύθερο Λογισμικό</a></li>
<li><a href="/freesoftware/society/system.html">
Το Ελεύθερο Λογισμικό στο σύστημά μας</a></li>
<li><a href="/freesoftware/society/facebooks-open-graph.html">
Το OpenGraph του Facebook: Ώρα να φεύγουμε</a></li>
<!-- Keep this out for now until it is no longer in draft status
<li><a
href="http://blogs.fsfe.org/hugo/2010/01/why-free-software-matters-for-society-draft/">Why
Free Software matters to society by Hugo Roy</a></li> -->
</ul>
</div>
</body>
<timestamp>$Date: 2010-08-05 15:36:02 +0200 (Thu, 05 Aug 2010) $ $Author: maelle $</timestamp>
</html>
<!--
Local Variables: ***
mode: xml ***
End: ***
-->

53
freesoftware/society/society.en.xhtml
View File

@@ -1,53 +0,0 @@
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<html>
<version>1</version>
<head>
<title>Free Software in Society</title>
</head>
<body>
<h1>Free software, Free Society</h1>
<div id="introduction">
<p> <!-- short text explaning the whys and whereabout --> The most basic
definition of a society is a group of people related to each other through
organized relations. Our societies are based on sets of values, on a shared
culture and shared institutions. Democracy, human rights, gender equality,
rights of the disadvantaged, freedom of expression, privacy and security, are
examples of what our societies have achieved and what ought to be
preserved.</p>
</div>
<p>Proprietary software jeopardize the freedoms of the user in a digital
world, but also the overall equilibrium of our system based on values that
Free software - contrary to non-free one- defend.</p>
<div class="related">
<h2>Related information</h2>
<ul>
<li><a href="/freesoftware/society/democracy.html">Why democratic government requires Free Software</a></li>
<li><a href="/freesoftware/society/system.html">Free Software in our
system</a></li>
<li><a href="/freesoftware/society/facebooks-open-graph.html">Facebook's
OpenGraph: Time to get out</a></li>
<!-- Keep this out for now until it is no longer in draft status
<li><a
href="http://blogs.fsfe.org/hugo/2010/01/why-free-software-matters-for-society-draft/">Why
Free Software matters to society by Hugo Roy</a></li> -->
</ul>
</div>
</body>
<timestamp>$Date: 2010-08-05 15:36:02 +0200 (Thu, 05 Aug 2010) $ $Author: maelle $</timestamp>
</html>
<!--
Local Variables: ***
mode: xml ***
End: ***
-->

49
freesoftware/society/society.fr.xhtml
View File

@@ -1,49 +0,0 @@
<html>
<version>1</version>
<head>
<title>Le Logiciel Libre dans la société</title>
</head>
<body>
<h1>Logiciel Libre, Société Libre</h1>
<div id="introduction">
<p>
La définition la plus basique d'une société est un groupe de personnes liées entre elles par des relations organisées. Nos sociétés sont basées sur des ensembles de valeurs, sur une culture partagée et des institutions communes. La démocratie, les droits de l'Homme, l'égalité des sexes, les droits des personnes défavorisées, la liberté d'expression, le respect de la vie privéeé et la sécurité, sont des exemples de ce que nos sociétés ont réalisé et de ce qui doit être préservé.
</p>
</div>
<p>
Le logiciel propriétaire met en péril les libertés des utilisateurs dans un monde numérique, mais aussi l'équilibre global de notre système basé sur des valeurs que défend le Logiciel Libre - contrairement au non-libre.
</p>
<div class="related">
<h2>Informations connexes</h2>
<ul>
<li>
<a href="/freesoftware/society/democracy.html">Pourquoi les gouvernements démocratiques ont besoin de Logiciels Libres&#160;?</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/freesoftware/society/system.html">Le Logiciel Libre dans nos systèmes</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/freesoftware/society/facebooks-open-graph.html">Facebook's OpenGraph&#160; : Il est temps d'en sortir</a>
</li>
<!--
Keep this out for now until it is no longer in draft status
<li>
<a href="http://blogs.fsfe.org/hugo/2010/01/why-free-software-matters-for-society-draft/">Why Free Software matters to society by Hugo Roy</a>
</li>
--><!-- Pourquoi le Logiciel Libre est important pour la société par Hugo Roy (Article d'Hugo de 2010 jamais terminé, laissé en commentaire uniquement pour cohérence avec la version anglaise)-->
</ul>
</div>
</body>
<timestamp>
$Date$ $Author$
</timestamp>
<translator>MDDN et Cryptie</translator>
</html>
<!--
Local Variables: ***
mode: xml ***
End: ***
-->

55
freesoftware/society/society.it.xhtml
View File

@@ -1,55 +0,0 @@
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<html>
<version>1</version>
<head>
<title>Il Software Libero nella Società</title>
</head>
<body>
<h1>Software Libero, Società Libera</h1>
<div id="introduction">
<p> <!-- short text explaning the whys and whereabout --> La
definizione più basilare di una società è "un gruppo di persone connesse le une alle altre tramite
relazioni organizzate". Le nostre società sono basate su una serie di valori, su
una cultura e delle istituzioni condivise. La democrazia, i diritti umani, l'uguaglianza tra generi,
i diritti agli svantaggiati, la libertà di espressione, la privacy e la sicurezza, sono
esempi di quanto le nostre società hanno raggiunto e di cosa debba essere
preservato.</p>
</div>
<p>Il software proprietario mette a repentaglio le libertà dell'utente in un mondo digitale,
ma anche l'equilibrio del nostro sistema basato su valori che
il Software Libero difende - a differenza di quello non-libero.</p>
<div class="related">
<h2>Ulteriori informazioni</h2>
<ul>
<li><a href="/freesoftware/society/democracy.html">Perché un governo democratico ha bisogno del Software Libero</a></li>
<li><a href="/freesoftware/society/system.html">Il Software Libero nel nostro sistema</a></li>
<li><a href="/freesoftware/society/facebooks-open-graph.html">OpenGraph di Facebook: tempo di uscirne</a></li>
<!-- Keep this out for now until it is no longer in draft status
<li><a
href="http://blogs.fsfe.org/hugo/2010/01/why-free-software-matters-for-society-draft/">Perché
il Software Libero è importante per la società, di Hugo Roy</a></li> -->
</ul>
</div>
</body>
<timestamp>$Date: 2010-08-05 15:36:02 +0200 (Thu, 05 Aug 2010) $ $Author: maelle $</timestamp>
<translator>Emanuele Croce, 16/09/2015</translator>
</html>
<!--
Local Variables: ***
mode: xml ***
End: ***
-->

53
freesoftware/society/society.nl.xhtml
View File

@@ -1,53 +0,0 @@
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<html>
<version>1</version>
<head>
<title>Vrije Software in de samenleving</title>
</head>
<body>
<h1>Vrije Software, vrije samenleving</h1>
<div id="introduction">
<p> <!-- short text explaning the whys and whereabout --> De meest eenvoudige definitie
van een samenleving is een groep mensen die met elkaar verbonden zijn door georganiseerde relaties.
Onze samenlevingen zijn gebaseerd op verzamelingen van waarden, op een gedeelde cultuur en
gedeelde instituten. Democratie, mensenrechten, gelijkheid van man en vrouw, de rechten van
achtergestelden, vrijheid van meningsuiting, privacy en veiligheid, zijn voorbeelden van wat onze
samenlevingen hebben bereikt en wat behouden zou moeten worden.</p>
</div>
<p>Niet-vrije software gaat in tegen de vrijheden van de gebruiker in een digitale wereld, maar ook
tegen het algehele evenwicht van ons op waarden gebaseerde systeem dat door Vrije Software -
in tegenstelling tot niet-vrije software - wordt verdedigd.</p>
<div class="related">
<h2>Verwante informatie</h2>
<ul>
<li><a href="/freesoftware/society/democracy.html">Waarom democratische regeringen Vrije Software vereisen</a></li>
<li><a href="/freesoftware/society/system.html">Vrije Software in ons systeem</a></li>
<li><a href="/freesoftware/society/facebooks-open-graph.html">Facebook's
OpenGraph: Tijd om weg te gaan</a></li>
<!-- Keep this out for now until it is no longer in draft status
<li><a
href="http://blogs.fsfe.org/hugo/2010/01/why-free-software-matters-for-society-draft/">Why
Free Software matters to society by Hugo Roy</a></li> -->
</ul>
</div>
</body>
<timestamp>$Datum: 2010-08-05 15:36:02 +0200 (don, 05 aug 2010) $ $Auteur: maelle $</timestamp>
<translator>André Ockers</translator>
</html>
<!--
Local Variables: ***
mode: xml ***
End: ***
-->

140
freesoftware/society/system.en.xhtml
View File

@@ -1,140 +0,0 @@
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<html>
<version>1</version>
<head>
<title>Free Software in Society</title>
</head>
<body>
<h1>Free Software preserves our system</h1>
<!-- this text comes orignially from /campaigns/wsis/fs.en.xhtml and should be
completed by Hugo's article at
blog.fsfe.org/hugo/why-free-software-matters-for-society-draft.
-->
<h3>Development</h3>
<p>When thinking about Free Software, it should be seen as an encompassing
concept for a reliable, sustainable and dependable information and knowledge
society involving all stakeholders.</p>
<p>The price we are paying for the predominance of the proprietary software
approach is high. Because the proprietary software paradigm has a strong,
system-inherent monopolising tendency [<A NAME="ref1"
HREF="#1">1</A>] and software permeates all areas of
economy, northern economies suffer and southern countries are given the
choice between exclusion or co-suffering in total dependence. That is why
breaking up Microsoft without a change in paradigm would not improve the
situation significantly. Free Software, on the other hand, brings back
competition while allowing cooperation among companies, people, and
governments. All of these equally available and empowering to all the
peoples.</p>
<p>While minorities remain at the mercy of large multinational companies
regarding support for their culture and language when using proprietary
software, Free Software gives them freedom to modify all software according
to their needs. Thus, Free Software also allows building a sustainable local
hard- and software industry independent from monopolies and large
multinationals. Of course cooperation with large companies is possible and
may be useful, but while dependency is the price to pay for such cooperation
in proprietary software, Free Software provides independence.</p>
<h3>Equality</h3>
<p>The design, development and use of software is increasing in all societies.
Increasingly, access to software is largely determining our capabilities for
education, communication, work and even social networking. This includes
building social movements, promoting citizenship and transparent democracy as
well as general governmental and health services.</p>
<p>Software in general has grown into northern societies to a very large extent
and if development policies are successful, this will also be true for
southern societies at some point in time. Therefore software must be
considered a cultural technique, sometimes even a cultural good.</p>
<p>For all central cultural techniques, we have to ask who should be put in
control of it. Proprietary software puts large northern multinationals in
control. [<A NAME="ref2" HREF="#2">2</A>] Free Software
makes this cultural technique equally available to all the peoples.</p>
<h3>Human Rights</h3>
<p>For those who are connected - and we surely hope this will mean all the
peoples at some point - human rights of participation in culture, freedom of
speech and opinion are influenced to a large extent by their control over the
software they use, as are freedom of association and movement. Software forms
the medium. Unlike the proprietary approach, Free Software gives each person
full control about their personal information space. Although this alone is
not sufficient to grant privacy and security, it is a necessary
prerequisite.</p>
<h3>Preventing Technocracy - upholding democracy</h3>
<p>Legislation should be developed by democratically elected representatives in
a transparent way. Even in situations where this is true, rights that cannot
be exercised remain empty. Granting rights on paper does not mean people will
have the means of exercising them.</p>
<p>The complexity of modern systems alone makes it a difficult task to uphold
democracy in the digital domain, but the overall intransparency of
proprietary software makes it impossible. Unless you are using Free
Software, the rights you can or cannot exercise are determined by the
proprietary software vendor - it is the vendors decision alone, a decision
that nowadays is often given precendence over the democratic legislative
process.</p>
<p>Good examples are the European Copyright Directive (EUCD) and Digital
Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), both implementations of the "The World
Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Copyright Treaty" (December 1996).
While the DMCA already gained notoriety for enabling censorship of
Scientology-critical sites in the United States, [<A NAME="ref3"
HREF="#3">3</A>] the German implementation of the EUCD is
silently making the right to fair use inaccessible. Although laws clearly
state that customers have the right to copy a CD for their car stereo or even
a friend, those who exercise this right on so-called "copy protected" CDs
or on any DVD now risk punishment. And if you think this is where it ends,
feel free to read the EFF paper on so-called "Trusted Computing" (TC). [<A
NAME="ref4" HREF="#4">4</A>] </p>
<p>Proprietary software effectively puts an area that was previously governed
by democratically elected representatives into the hand of corporations,
therefore establishing technocracy. [<A NAME="ref5"
HREF="#5">5</A>] </p>
<h3>Summary</h3>
<p>All of our hard work to defend and promote human rights, gender equality,
rights of the disadvantaged, a free media, privacy and security, digital
solidarity and other issues is in danger of having been for naught if the
information age is based on proprietary software.</p>
<p>Free Software alone is certainly not enough to overcome all problems - but
it is a necessity to empower people to exercise the rights we are fighting
for in the information societies.</p>
<h3>References</h3>
<p>[<A NAME="1" HREF="#ref1">1</A>] Explanation of these mechanisms will gladly be provided, if of interest.</p>
<p>[<A NAME="2" HREF="#ref2">2</A>] Side note: Which should
not be understood as a good thing for people in the northern countries. It is
not.</p>
<p>[<A NAME="3" HREF="#ref3">3</A>] For reference, see <code class="footnote">
<A NAME="ref11"
HREF="http://www-camlaw.rutgers.edu/publications/law-religion/scientology.htm">http://www-camlaw.rutgers.edu/publications/law-religion/scientology.htm</A></code>
(not available any more)</p>
<p>[<A NAME="4" HREF="#ref4">4</A>] <code class="footnote">
<A NAME="ref13" HREF="http://www.eff.org/files/20031001_tc.pdf">http://www.eff.org/files/20031001_tc.pdf</A></code></p>
<p>[<A NAME="5" HREF="#ref5">5</A>] Technocracy: "Government by technicians or management of society by technical experts." (Merriam Webster Dictionary)</p>
</body>
<timestamp>$Date: 2010-02-22 12:22:10 +0100 (Mon, 22 Feb 2010) $ $Author: maelle$</timestamp>
</html>
<!--
Local Variables: ***
mode: xml ***
End: ***
-->