Create article for BRP
This commit is contained in:
parent
fd1eeb96a2
commit
b93dd3394d
|
@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
|
|||
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
|
||||
|
||||
<html newsdate="2017-12-05">
|
||||
|
||||
<head>
|
||||
<title>Dutch government publishes large project as Free Software</title>
|
||||
</head>
|
||||
<body>
|
||||
|
||||
<h1>Dutch government publishes large project as Free Software</h1>
|
||||
|
||||
<p newsteaser="yes">
|
||||
This Wednesday, the Dutch Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations
|
||||
released the source code and documentation of Basisregistratie Personen (BRP),
|
||||
an IT system that contains information about inhabitants within the
|
||||
Netherlands. This comes as a great victory for Public Code.
|
||||
<p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>Operation BRP is an IT project by the Dutch government that has been in the
|
||||
works since 2010. It has cost Dutch taxpayers upwards of 100 million Euros and
|
||||
has endured three failed attempts at revival, without anything to show for
|
||||
it. From the outside, it was unclear what exactly was costing taxpayers so much
|
||||
money with very little information to go on. After the plug had been pulled from
|
||||
the project earlier this year in July, the former interior minister agreed to
|
||||
finally open up about the project and release the source code to the public as
|
||||
Free Software in the project's post-mortem.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>In 2013, when the first smoke signals showed, the minister initially wanted
|
||||
to address concerns about the project by providing limited parts of the source
|
||||
code to a limited amount of people under certain restrictive conditions. The
|
||||
ministry has since made a complete about-face,
|
||||
releasing <a href="https://github.com/MinBZK/OperatieBRP">a snapshot of the full
|
||||
source code and documentation</a> under the terms of the GNU Affero General
|
||||
Public License, with the development history soon to follow.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>In <a href="https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/documenten/brieven/2017/11/10/afschrift-brief-over-openbaarmaking-broncode-brp">a
|
||||
letter to Dutch municipalities</a> earlier this month, secretary of state Knops
|
||||
said that he is convinced of the need of an even playing field for all parties,
|
||||
and that he intends to "let the publication happen under open source
|
||||
terms". He went on to say: "What has been realised in operation BRP
|
||||
has namely been financed with public funds. Software that is built on top of
|
||||
this source code should in turn be available to the public again."</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>These statements are an echo of our <a href="https://publiccode.eu/">Public
|
||||
Money, Public Code</a> campaign, in which we implore public administrations to
|
||||
release software funded by the public as Free Software available to the
|
||||
citizenry that paid for it.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>The echoes of 'Public Money, Public Code' do not stop
|
||||
there. In <a href="https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/documenten/kamerstukken/2017/11/29/kamerbrief-over-openbaarmaking-meest-recente-versie-broncode-brp">a
|
||||
letter to the Dutch parliament</a> this Wednesday, the secretary of state writes
|
||||
about the AGPL: "The license terms assure that changes to the source code
|
||||
are also made publicly available. In this way, reuse is further supported. The
|
||||
AGPL offers the best guarantee for this, and besides the GPL (General Public
|
||||
License), sees a lot of use and support in the open source community.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>"Publication will happen free of charge so that, in the public interest,
|
||||
an even playing field is created for everyone who wants to reuse this
|
||||
code."</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>This is big news from the Netherlands and an unprecedented move of
|
||||
transparency by the Dutch
|
||||
government. Following <a href="https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/documenten/rapporten/2017/10/11/onderzoek-open-source-software">a
|
||||
report</a> to the Ministry of the Interior about publishing government software
|
||||
as Open Source Software, it seems that this will happen more often. In it, Open
|
||||
Source Software is described as making the government more transparent, lowering
|
||||
costs, increasing innovation, forming the foundation for a digital participation
|
||||
society, and increasing the quality of code.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
</body>
|
||||
<tags>
|
||||
<tag>front-page</tag>
|
||||
<tag>Public Money Public Code</tag>
|
||||
</tags>
|
||||
<author id="carmenbianca" />
|
||||
</html>
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue