parent
1d248a32f4
commit
859caeeb9f
|
@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
|
|||
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
|
||||
|
||||
<html newsdate="2011-12-13">
|
||||
<head>
|
||||
<title>Nortel/Rockstar, Google/Motorola deals create balance of terror on
|
||||
software patents</title>
|
||||
|
||||
</head>
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
<body>
|
||||
<h1>Nortel/Rockstar, Google/Motorola deals create balance of terror on
|
||||
software patents</h1>
|
||||
|
||||
<p newsteaser="yes">On Monday, the US Department of Justice approved the sale of
|
||||
Nortel's
|
||||
patent portfolio to a consortium led by Apple and Microsoft. At the same
|
||||
time, the DOJ and the European Commission allowed Google to buy
|
||||
Motorola Mobility, thus giving the search company a sizable patent
|
||||
portfolio.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>
|
||||
"We appreciate that competition authorities in the US and Europe continue to
|
||||
take software patents seriously as a risk to competition," says Karsten
|
||||
Gerloff, President of the Free Software Foundation Europe. "However, we
|
||||
believe that the commitments made by Google, Microsoft and Apple regarding
|
||||
their patent licensing policies are not sufficient to allow everyone to compete
|
||||
on equal terms."
|
||||
</p>
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
<p>
|
||||
The terms of those commitments do nothing to ensure that the software patents
|
||||
in the portfolios in question can be implemented in Free Software.
|
||||
</p>
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
<p>
|
||||
While Microsoft has said that it will not seek injunctions against
|
||||
companies using its standard-essential patents, this policy merely restates
|
||||
the commitments Microsoft has already made to standards organisations.
|
||||
Microsoft will only license its patents on so-called "RAND" terms (short
|
||||
for "reasonable and non-discriminatory"). These typically require the
|
||||
company that implements the patents to pay a licensing fee per unit.
|
||||
</p>
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
<p>
|
||||
Despite their name, such conditions are largely incompatible with Free
|
||||
Software based on <a href="http://fsfe.org/projects/os/def.html">Open
|
||||
Standards</a>, standards which can be implemented by anyone in any business or
|
||||
software model. This means that Microsoft remains free to use its patents to
|
||||
block or harm some of its most important Free Software competitors, such as
|
||||
the GNU/Linux operating system and the LibreOffice productivity suite.
|
||||
</p>
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
<p>
|
||||
"By greenlighting both the Google and Nortel transactions, the DOJ has merely
|
||||
created a balance of terror where patents are concerned," says Gerloff. "Small
|
||||
companies and individual software developers don't have the deep pockets
|
||||
required to play the patent litigation game. They will suffer as a result of
|
||||
this deal, along with the shareholders of Google, Microsoft and Apple.
|
||||
When elephants dance, the smaller wildlife gets crushed."
|
||||
</p>
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
<p>
|
||||
FSFE submitted a comprehensive
|
||||
<a href="http://fsfe.org/projects/swpat/nortel.en.html">statement of
|
||||
concern</a> to the US Department of Justice in September 2011.
|
||||
</p>
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
</body>
|
||||
<tags>
|
||||
<tag>front-page</tag>
|
||||
<tag>Free Software</tag>
|
||||
</tags>
|
||||
</html>
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue