diff --git a/news/2019/news-20190520-01.en.xhtml b/news/2019/news-20190520-01.en.xhtml
index 8fbe640ba4..841ffbf436 100644
--- a/news/2019/news-20190520-01.en.xhtml
+++ b/news/2019/news-20190520-01.en.xhtml
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) presents three essential lessons
 from this case.</p>
 
 <p>Following the U.S. administration's decision to effectively ban 
-American companies from doing trade with the Chinese company Huawei, 
+American companies from trading with with the Chinese company Huawei, 
 Google suspended all business with the company. This affects all 
 software which is not covered under Free Software licences. In 
 practice, Huawei's upcoming and potentially also current phones will no 
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ non-free components of most stock Android devices have numerous
 downsides for users, as the <a href="https://freeyourandroid.org">FSFE 
 has documented since 2012</a>. Now, the current case demonstrates that 
 even tech giants like Huawei face similar dependencies and vendor 
-lock-in effects as any individual users if they rely on proprietary 
+lock-in effects as those of any individual users if they rely on proprietary 
 software.</p>
 
 <h2>Three Conclusions</h2>
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ software.</p>
   <br />
   <li>The FSFE urges <strong>companies</strong> to use as much Free 
   Software as possible in their supply chains. Proprietary software 
-  makes a company dependent on its vendor and this vendor's government. 
+  makes a company dependent on its vendor and that vendor's government. 
   The current case shows that the US was able to force Google to stop 
   delivery of its proprietary products – but could not stop delivery of 
   the Free Software components of Android. Had Huawei invested more