FSFE/fsfe-website
26
32
Fork 92
Code Issues 65 Pull Requests 10 Wiki Activity

2010-02-17 Martin Gollowitzer <gollo@fsfe.org>

Browse Source 
* fixed broken link

svn path=/trunk/; revision=15093
This commit is contained in:
gollo
2010-02-17 07:28:36 +00:00
parent f07728c820
commit 6b3c3aa427
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
about/greve/greve.en.xhtml
View File

@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ Free Software Foundation Europe.</p>
<ul> <ul>
<li><a href="http://blogs.fsfe.org/greve/?p=354">Changes in FSFE: Time to pass on the torch</a> (2009-06-24)<br />Introducing the new executive team of FSFE and giving background for the handover.</li> <li><a href="http://blogs.fsfe.org/greve/?p=354">Changes in FSFE: Time to pass on the torch</a> (2009-06-24)<br />Introducing the new executive team of FSFE and giving background for the handover.</li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.fsfe.org/greve/?p=309">Considerations on Innovation and Competition Policy</a> (2009-03-31)<br /> Contribution to the workshop "<a href="http://www.voxinternet.org/spip.php?article279&amp;lang=en">Technical Regulation of the Internet : From Standardization to Behavioral and Societal Norms</a>" in Paris, France. The article provides an overview over different areas of innovation policy, their interaction, and how to strike a balance between the conflicting methodologies of different innovative instruments. Audio recording of the corresponding talk made available by the organisers as <a href="http://download.fsfeurope.org/audio/20090331-Greve-Paris.ogg">OGG Vorbis</a> and <a href="http://download.fsfeurope.org/audio/20090331-Greve-Paris.mp3">MP3</a>. </li> <li><a href="http://blogs.fsfe.org/greve/?p=309">Considerations on Innovation and Competition Policy</a> (2009-03-31)<br /> Contribution to the workshop "<a href="http://www.voxinternet.org/spip.php?article279&amp;lang=en">Technical Regulation of the Internet : From Standardization to Behavioral and Societal Norms</a>" in Paris, France. The article provides an overview over different areas of innovation policy, their interaction, and how to strike a balance between the conflicting methodologies of different innovative instruments. Audio recording of the corresponding talk made available by the organisers as <a href="http://download.fsfeurope.org/audio/20090331-Greve-Paris.ogg">OGG Vorbis</a> and <a href="http://download.fsfeurope.org/audio/20090331-Greve-Paris.mp3">MP3</a>. </li>
<li><a href="/projects/os/ps.html">Analysis on balance: Standardisation and Patents</a> (2008-12-02)<br /> Following up on the "<a href="http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/ict/policy/standards/ws08ipr_en.htm">IPR in ICT Standardisation</a>" Workshop two weeks ago in Brussels, FSFE president Georg Greve analysed the conflicts between patents and standards. The resulting is paper about the most harmful effects of patents on standards, the effectiveness of current remedies, and potential future remedies.</li> <li><a href="/projects/os/ps.html">Analysis on balance: Standardisation and Patents</a> (2008-12-02)<br /> Following up on the "<a href="http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/newsroom/cf/itemshortdetail.cfm?item_id=3371">IPR in ICT Standardisation</a>" Workshop two weeks ago in Brussels, FSFE president Georg Greve analysed the conflicts between patents and standards. The resulting is paper about the most harmful effects of patents on standards, the effectiveness of current remedies, and potential future remedies.</li>
<li><a href="/projects/wipo/statement-20070928.html">FSFE's written statement to the 2007 General Assembly</a> (2007-09-28)<br />Statement at the <a href="http://www.wipo.int/meetings/en/details.jsp?meeting_id=12803">2007 Assemblies of the Member States of WIPO</a>, 24 September - 3 October 2007</li> <li><a href="/projects/wipo/statement-20070928.html">FSFE's written statement to the 2007 General Assembly</a> (2007-09-28)<br />Statement at the <a href="http://www.wipo.int/meetings/en/details.jsp?meeting_id=12803">2007 Assemblies of the Member States of WIPO</a>, 24 September - 3 October 2007</li>
<li><a href="http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20070923170905803">Microsoft, antitrust and innovation (on Groklaw)</a> (2007-09-27)<br />"If one were to believe Microsoft, antitrust law is for sore losers who are too lazy to innovate, and the decision of the European Court of Justice against Microsoft was to the detriment of consumers around the world. One might even believe that any company with large enough market share would now have to fear the wrath of the European Commission and its anti-innovation bloodhounds."</li> <li><a href="http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20070923170905803">Microsoft, antitrust and innovation (on Groklaw)</a> (2007-09-27)<br />"If one were to believe Microsoft, antitrust law is for sore losers who are too lazy to innovate, and the decision of the European Court of Justice against Microsoft was to the detriment of consumers around the world. One might even believe that any company with large enough market share would now have to fear the wrath of the European Commission and its anti-innovation bloodhounds."</li>
<li><a href="/documents/msooxml-converter-hoax.html">The converter hoax</a> (2007-07-16)<br />FSFE Guest Commentary on Heise.de: "Conversion between Microsoft's Office OpenXML (MS-OOXML) and the vendor-independent Open Document Format (ODF) has been proposed by Microsoft and its associates as a solution to the problems caused by Microsoft's efforts to push a format into the market that conflicts with the existing Open Standard. [...] If these converters were actually able to do what they promise to do, they would be unnecessary." </li> <li><a href="/documents/msooxml-converter-hoax.html">The converter hoax</a> (2007-07-16)<br />FSFE Guest Commentary on Heise.de: "Conversion between Microsoft's Office OpenXML (MS-OOXML) and the vendor-independent Open Document Format (ODF) has been proposed by Microsoft and its associates as a solution to the problems caused by Microsoft's efforts to push a format into the market that conflicts with the existing Open Standard. [...] If these converters were actually able to do what they promise to do, they would be unnecessary." </li>