news about digital-o-mat

svn path=/trunk/; revision=35809
This commit is contained in:
eal 2017-08-29 09:13:43 +00:00
parent efa3af8e3f
commit 651677bfbf
2 changed files with 21 additions and 21 deletions

View File

@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ Der <a href="http://bund.digital-o-mat.de/">Digital-O-Mat</a> macht die jeweilig
<li>Sollen öffentliche Verwaltungen ihre IT schrittweise auf Freie und Open-Source-Software umstellen?</li>
</ul>
<p>CDU/CSU und FDP haben ihre Antwort als "neutral" klassifiziert und in einer sehr ähnlichen Weise geantwortet. Leider werden klare Aussagen vermieden und so letztlich der Status Quo zementiert. So sei der verstärkte Einsatz Freier Software einerseits zwar vorgesehen, aber auf der anderen Seite seien zahlreiche Aspekte mit einem derartigen Einsatz abzuwägen. Diese Aspekte sind jedoch teilweise inhaltlich undifferenziert. Beispielsweise werden darunter Funktionalität oder Usability aufgeführt, was wiederum in keinem Zusammenhang mit der verwendeten Lizenz steht. Auf die Frage über die Migration bestehender IT-Systeme bevorzugt die CDU/CSU eine Einzelfallentscheidung, während die FDP unsere Frage inhaltlich schlicht umgeht und damit nicht unbeantwortet lässt. </p>
<p>CDU/CSU und FDP haben ihre Antwort als "neutral" klassifiziert und in einer sehr ähnlichen Weise geantwortet. Leider werden klare Aussagen vermieden und so letztlich der Status Quo zementiert. So sei der verstärkte Einsatz Freier Software einerseits zwar vorgesehen, aber auf der anderen Seite seien zahlreiche Aspekte mit einem derartigen Einsatz abzuwägen. Allerdings werden unter diesen Aspekten beispielsweise Funktionalität oder Usability aufgeführt, was wiederum in keinem Zusammenhang mit der verwendeten Lizenz steht. Auf die Frage über die Migration bestehender IT-Systeme bevorzugt die CDU/CSU eine Einzelfallentscheidung, während die FDP unsere Frage inhaltlich schlicht umgeht und damit nicht unbeantwortet lässt. </p>
<p>Obwohl die SPD ihre Antwort ebenfalls als "neutral" klassifiziert hat, unterstützt sie die Verwendung und Entwicklung Freier Software in öffentlichen Verwaltungen und Bildungseinrichtungen, um "innovative Unternehmensgründungen im regionalen Markt zu unterstützen". Als Unterstützer der Verwendung und Entwicklung Freier Software durch öffentliche Gelder positionieren sich schließlich Bündnis 90/Grüne und Die Linke. Die Grünen betrachten Freie Software als einen "Eckpfeiler für sichere und zukunftsfähige IT-Systeme", und auch die Linken zeigen ihre volle Unterstützung, soweit dem keine sicherheitstechnische oder arbeitstechnische Gründe entgegenstehen.</p>

View File

@ -2,42 +2,42 @@
<html newsdate="2018-08-29">
<head>
<title>Digital-O-Mat: Compare your views on digital issues with the parties for the German federal election</title>
<head>
<title>Digital-O-Mat: Compare your views on Internet policies with the parties for the German federal election 2017</title>
</head>
<body>
<h1>Digital-O-Mat: Compare your views on digital issues with the parties for the German federal election</h1>
<h1>Digital-O-Mat: Compare your views on Internet policies with the parties for the German federal election 2017</h1>
<p newsteaser="yes">Even as digital issues are becoming more important every day, the election coverage does not give them the attention they deserve. That is why Koalition Freies Wissen created "Digital-O-Mat", an online tool for voter information for the German federal election of 2017. The FSFE asked the participating partis for their positions on Free Software. While CDU/CSU (Christian Democrats), SPD (Social Democrats) and FDP (Free Democrats) avoid clear statements and thus ultimately cement the status quo, the Greens and the Left present themselves as supporters of the deployment and public development of Free Software.</p>
<p newsteaser="yes">Although digital issues are becoming increasingly important, general election coverage often miss them out. That is why the "Koalition Freies Wissen" ("Free Knowledge Coalition") created the "Digital-O-Mat", an online tool for voter information for the German federal election of 2017. The FSFE asked the participating parties about their positions on Free Software. CDU/CSU, SPD and FDP avoid clear statements and thus confirm the status quo, the Greens and the Left in contrast present themselves as supporters of Free Software.</p>
<h3>What is Digital-O-Mat?</h3>
<h3>What is the Digital-O-Mat?</h3>
<p><div class="captioned right" style="max-width: 300px; width: 30%;">
<a href="https://bund.digital-o-mat.de/"><img src="/picturebase/miscellaneous/2017-08-28-digitalomat-logo-and-image.jpg" alt="Digital-O-Mat Logo CC-BY Elio Qoshi" /></a>
</div>
<p><div class="captioned right" style="max-width: 300px; width: 30%;">
<a href="https://bund.digital-o-mat.de/"><img src="/picturebase/miscellaneous/2017-08-28-digitalomat-logo-and-image.jpg" alt="Digital-O-Mat Logo CC-BY Elio Qoshi" /></a>
</div>
<a href="http://bund.digital-o-mat.de/">Digital-O-Mat</a> highlights the parties' positions on Free Software and helps voters find a matching party for the election to the German parliament. Its design resembles the well-known Wahl-O-Mat. Users of Digital-O-Mat are able to answer twelve questions and then compare their position to the participating parties. The topics of Digital-O-Mat include transparency, surveillance digital civil rights and, of course, Free Software. We asked AfD (Alternative for Germany), Bündnis 90/Die Grünen (Greens), CDU (Christian Democrats), CSU (Christian Socialists), FDP (Free Democrats), Die Linke (The Left) and the SPD (Social Democrats). We received replies from everyone except AfD. <a href="https://github.com/dsstio/digital-o-mat">Digital-O-Mat is Free Software</a> and had its debut in 2017 for the <a href="https://fsfe.org/news/2017/news-20170419-01">state parliament elections in North Rhine-Westphalia (Germany)</a>.</p>
The <a href="http://bund.digital-o-mat.de/">Digital-O-Mat</a> highlights the parties' positions on Internet policy relevant topics and helps voters to find their matching party for the election to the German parliament. Its design resembles the well-known Wahl-O-Mat, a popular online voter information tool by the German Federal Agency for Civic Education . Users of the Digital-O-Mat are able to answer twelve questions and then compare their position to the participating parties. The topics of Digital-O-Mat include transparency, surveillance, digital civil rights and, of course, Free Software. We asked AfD, Bündnis 90/Die Grünen, CDU/CSU, FDP, Die Linke and the SPD. We received replies from everyone except AfD. <a href="https://github.com/dsstio/digital-o-mat">Digital-O-Mat is Free Software</a> and had its debut in 2017 for the <a href="https://fsfe.org/news/2017/news-20170419-01">state parliament elections in North Rhine-Westphalia (Germany)</a>.</p>
<h3>The parties' positions on Free Software</h3>
<h3>The parties' positions on Free Software</h3>
<p>For Digital-O-Mat, FSFE asked the participating parties the following questions:</p>
<ul>
<li>If software is financed or co-financed by the public sector, should there be no regulation regarding its licensing, e.g. a Free Software licence?</li>
<li>Should public administrations gradually migrate their IT systems to Free and Open Source software?</li>
</ul>
<p>For Digital-O-Mat, the Free Software Floundation Europe asked the participating parties the following questions:</p>
<ul>
<li>If software is financed or co-financed by the public sector, should there be no regulation regarding its licensing, e.g. a Free Software licence?</li>
<li>Should public administrations gradually migrate their IT systems to Free and Open Source software?</li>
</ul>
<p>CDU/CSU and FDP marked their position as "neutral" and answered in a very similar fashion. Unfortunately, these parties still do not understand the significance of Free Software and try to avoid clear statements. According to them, while they do consider the use of Free Software, this should be weighed against many other aspects. They cite functionality and usability, even though they have no relation to the used licence. When asked about the migration of existing IT systems, CDU/CSU prefer decision making on a case-by-case basis, while FDP dodged our question. </p>
<p>CDU/CSU (conservatives) and FDP (liberals) marked their position as "neutral" and answered in a very similar fashion. Unfortunately, these parties avoid making a clear stance and ultimately confirm the status quo. On one hand, they do consider the use of Free Software, on the other hand, so they say, there are multiple other aspects to consider weigh in. However, they list functionality and usability for example, even though they have no relation to the licence in use. When asked about the migration of existing IT systems, CDU/CSU prefer decision making on a case-by-case basis, while FDP dodged our question. </p>
<p>Though SPD also marked their answer as "neutral", they support they do support the deployment and development in public administrations and educational institutions, "to foster the creation of innovative businesses in the local market". The Left and the Greens clearly position themselves as supporters of both deployment and public funding of Free Software. The Greens view Free Software as a "cornerstone for secure and future-proof IT systems", and the also fully support it, "as long as there are no concerns regarding security or operation." </p>
<p>Although the SPD (labour) also marked their answer as "neutral", they support the deployment and development of Free Software in public administrations and educational institutions, "to foster the creation of innovative businesses in the local market". Die Linke (lefts) and Bündnis 90/Die Grünen (greens) position themselves as supporters of deployment and public funding of Free Software. The greens consider Free Software to be a "cornerstone for secure and future-proof IT systems", and the lefts also fully support it, as long as there are no concerns regarding security or operation. </p>
<h3>About "Koalition Freies Wissen"</h3>
<h3>About the "Koalition Freies Wissen"</h3>
<p>Koalition Freies Wissen ("Free Knowledge Coalition") is an association of multiple civic organisations, namely <a href="http://buendnis-freie-bildung.de/">Bündnis Freie Bildung</a>, <a href="http://buendnis-freie-bildung.de/">Chaos Computer Club e.V.</a>, <a href="https://digitalegesellschaft.de/">Digitale Gesellschaft e.V.</a>, <a href="https://freifunk.net/">Freifunk</a>, <a href="https://okfn.de/">Open Knowledge Foundation Deutschland e.V.</a>, <a href="https://www.wikimedia.de/wiki/Hauptseite">Wikimedia Deutschland e.V.</a> and the <a href="https://fsfe.org">Free Software Foundation Europe</a>. </p>
<p>The Koalition Freies Wissen ("Free Knowledge Coalition") is an association of multiple civic organisations, namely <a href="http://buendnis-freie-bildung.de/">Bündnis Freie Bildung</a>, <a href="http://buendnis-freie-bildung.de/">Chaos Computer Club e.V.</a>, <a href="https://digitalegesellschaft.de/">Digitale Gesellschaft e.V.</a>, <a href="https://freifunk.net/">Freifunk</a>, <a href="https://okfn.de/">Open Knowledge Foundation Deutschland e.V.</a>, <a href="https://www.wikimedia.de/wiki/Hauptseite">Wikimedia Deutschland e.V.</a> and the <a href="https://fsfe.org">Free Software Foundation Europe</a>. </p>
<p>The common goal of Koalition Freies Wissen is to disseminate knowledge about digital and Internet issues as well as to establish digital civil rights as an issue in society and politics. The coalition has sent questions to the participating in the previous state parliament elections this year and has now created the Digital-O-Mat for the German federal elections 2017.</p>
<p>The common goal of the Koalition Freies Wissen is to disseminate knowledge about digital and Internet policy issues as well as to highlight and establish digital civil rights in society and politics. The coalition has sent questions to the participating parties in previous state parliament elections this year and has now created the Digital-O-Mat for the German federal elections 2017.</p>
Related content: <a href="https://digital-o-mat.de/">Digital-O-Mat</a>