FSFE/fsfe-website
25
31
Fork 92
Code Issues 65 Pull Requests 11 Wiki Activity

slight fixes

Browse Source 
svn path=/trunk/; revision=32698
This commit is contained in:
Matthias Kirschner
2016-02-01 09:17:51 +00:00
parent 48f4035698
commit 5aea65da70
1 changed files with 7 additions and 7 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

14
news/2016/news-20160128-01.en.xhtml
View File

@@ -19,22 +19,22 @@
<p>In particular:</p>
<ul>
<li><p>Paragraph 89 considers that software providers should better promote
the security advantages of open source software. </p></li>
<li><p>Paragraph 89 considers that software providers "should better promote
the security advantages of open source software". </p></li>
<li><p>Paragraph 110 urges the European Commission and the Council to
increase the share of free and open source software and its reuse in and
between public administrations as a solution to increase interoperability.</p></li>
"increase the share of free and open source software and its reuse in and
between public administrations as a solution to increase interoperability".</p></li>
<li><p>Paragraph 125 calls for the increased use of free and open source
<li><p>Paragraph 125 calls for "the increased use of free and open source
software, particularly in educational establishments and public
administrations. </p></li>
administrations". </p></li>
</ul>
<p>On not so positive side, the report stresses that the ability to
license standard-essntial patents under FRAND licensing terms fosters
innovation and preserves research, development and standardisation incentives despite the
well-established fact that <a href="https://fsfe.org/activities/os/why-frand-is-bad-for-free-software.en.html"
well-established fact that <a href="/activities/os/why-frand-is-bad-for-free-software.html"
>FRAND licensing practices are harmful to Free Software</a>.</p>
<p>FSFE nevertheless welcomes the adoption of the report and calls on the