adding some quote

svn path=/trunk/; revision=24101

campaigns/eura-slovakia/eura.en.xhtml

@@ -36,6 +36,12 @@
 
 		<h2>Litigation</h2>
 <p>FSFE toghether with experts from <a href="http://eisionline.org/">European Information Society Institute (EISi)</a> assisted EURA Slovakia in its <a href="http://eisionline.org/index.php/projekty-m/sudy-a-obcianska-spolocnost-m/33-podnikatel-zaluje-stat">appeal</a> before the Regional Court in Banská Bystrica. Our basic arguments were that this behaviour of the state is in breach of local legislation on open standards, competition laws, principle of rule of law and basic right to engage in entrepreneurial activity. In the submission, we also argue that state acted contrary to art. 3(7) of Electronic Signatures Directive. For this reason we also request that Slovak court makes preliminary reference to the Court of Justice of the European Union on the issue of whether it is compatible with art. 3(7) of Electronic Signatures Directive to restric the use of electronic signatures in public sector to only one vendor.</p>
+
+<blockqoute>
+Article 3 - Market access
+(7) Member States may make the use of electronic signatures in the public sector subject to possible additional requirements. Such requirements shall be objective, transparent, proportionate and non-discriminatory and shall relate only to the specific characteristics of the application concerned. Such requirements may not constitute an obstacle to cross-border services for citizens.
+</blockqoute>
+
 <p>Soon after the filing of the case, the Court attempted to proceduraly devide one case into 11 different and paralel cases. As this would pose extraordinary obstacles for litigation, we helped EURA Slovakia to file a compliant before the Constitutional Court of Slovak republic. After its decision, the case will continue before the Regional Court in Banská Bystrica.</p>
 
 	  <h2>Related news</h2>