adding LLW news
svn path=/trunk/; revision=35483
This commit is contained in:
parent
b88e2a571d
commit
2999a0b16b
115
news/2017/news-20170619-01.en.xhtml
Normal file
115
news/2017/news-20170619-01.en.xhtml
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
|
||||
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
|
||||
<html newsdate="2018-06-19">
|
||||
|
||||
<head>
|
||||
<title>Legal and Licensing Workshop 2017: Its 10th edition "restarts" debates in Free Software licensing</title>
|
||||
</head>
|
||||
|
||||
<body>
|
||||
|
||||
<h1>Legal and Licensing Workshop 2017: Its 10th edition "restarts" debates in Free Software licensing</h1>
|
||||
|
||||
<p newsteaser="yes">In April, the FSFE organised its annual
|
||||
<a href="https://fsfe.org/activities/ftf/legal-conference.en.html">Free
|
||||
Software Legal and Licensing Workshop</a> (LLW): a meeting point for
|
||||
legal experts from all over the world to discuss issues and best practices
|
||||
surrounding Free Software licences. This year marks the 10th anniversary
|
||||
of the LLW which was celebrated with the record number of participants:
|
||||
120 top legal experts and technologists came all the way down to Barcelona
|
||||
(Spain) to spend 3 full days discussing legal challenges around Free Software.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>This year, the workshop was held under theme "Restart". Based on the
|
||||
topics discussed <a href="https://fsfe.org/activities/ftf/legal-conference.en.html">in the previous editions</a>,
|
||||
it seemed that several prominent discussions needed to be reopened in
|
||||
order to address emerging challenges. Experts had the opportunity to
|
||||
debate on various legal issues, including but not limited to: open data
|
||||
and hardware, open government, tooling for lawyers, software patents,
|
||||
copyright trolls an other existing challenges for Free Software compliance,
|
||||
by attending more than 35 presentations of internationally distinguished
|
||||
speakers with long-standing contribution in the field.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>Admission to the event was open to all
|
||||
<a href="https://fsfe.org/activities/ftf/ln-rules.en.html#join">Legal Network</a>
|
||||
members, while the whole event was covered under the
|
||||
<a href="https://www.chathamhouse.org/about/chatham-house-rule">Chatham
|
||||
House Rule</a>, enabling confidential discussions under fair terms for
|
||||
all the participants.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>The part of event was covered by Jake Edge from LWN.net, who
|
||||
underlined the following discussions during the workshop:</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>Shane Coughlan, Armijn Hemel and Mark Radcliffe participated in a panel
|
||||
discussing <a href="https://lwn.net/Articles/721458/">the rise of the
|
||||
copyright troll</a>. Despite copyright trolls not being something new
|
||||
to the Free Software legal world, the three panellists analysed the
|
||||
methodology behind such enforcement efforts, based on McHardy's case
|
||||
in Germany, and discussed ways to address that problem through governance
|
||||
of Free Software projects.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>The FSFE program manager, Max Mehl shared with the audience the
|
||||
<a href="https://lwn.net/Articles/722197/">FSFE's concerns about the EU radio equipment directive</a>
|
||||
(RED). RED might be leading device makers to lock down their hardware,
|
||||
stripping users and vendors from their right to install alternative software
|
||||
of their choice on it. Existing legal uncertainty over newly introduced
|
||||
requirements for hardware manufacturers poses a real threat to Free Software
|
||||
enterprises and projects, thus a timely response to these concerns is
|
||||
critical for software freedom on all devices that emit and/or receive
|
||||
radio waves, including laptops and smartphones. Max Mehl presented
|
||||
<a href="https://fsfe.org/activities/radiodirective/statement.en.html">the
|
||||
Joint Statement against Radio Lockdown</a>, signed by almost 50 organisations
|
||||
and companies, and invited everyone to take part in the relevant discussions
|
||||
by subscribing to <a href="https://lists.fsfe.org/mailman/listinfo/radiodirective">the dedicated mailing list</a>.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>Luis Villa, as one of the speakers presenting on open data,
|
||||
<a href="https://lwn.net/Articles/721540/">shed light on the legal implications</a>
|
||||
that need to be taken into account, especially with regard to the data
|
||||
sets used by machine-learning systems. Privacy concerns, cross-jurisdictional
|
||||
issues, copyright claims and an emerging right to explanation are all
|
||||
open legal questions, waiting for a not-so-easy response, according to
|
||||
Luis Villa. A move towards open data has already began in this area but
|
||||
the legal difficulties remain: can a copyright licence, albeit open*,
|
||||
address all these issues? The regulatory response from the governments
|
||||
may also not be the best solution to provide necessary leverage, according
|
||||
to Luis Villa.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>In the Free Software world, the supply chain is perplexed and global,
|
||||
characterised by compliance challenges within numerous Free Software
|
||||
licences. Shane Coughlan <a href="https://lwn.net/Articles/721698/">described the OpenChain project</a>
|
||||
as the means that helps companies in the supply chain to keep track of
|
||||
their compliance, irrespective of the preferred Free Software licence.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>Another recent effort from the pioneers of the GPL compliance - Shane
|
||||
Coughlan and Armijn Hemel - was also presented during the workshop:
|
||||
<a href="https://www.linuxfoundation.org/news-media/research/practical-gpl-compliance">Practical GPL Compliance</a>
|
||||
is designed to guide individuals and companies for better GPL compliance
|
||||
when working with Free Software.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>Last but not least, this year marked also a "restart" for our
|
||||
long-serving <a href="https://fsfe.org/activities/ftf/fiduciary.en.html">Fiduciary Licensing Agreement</a> (FLA).
|
||||
The FLA is a well-balanced contributor agreement, which gives the trustee
|
||||
responsible power to make sure the contributed software always remain
|
||||
free and open. Matija Šuklje, the previous FSFE's Legal Coordinator and
|
||||
the main driving force behind the FLA update, presented the challenges,
|
||||
process and changes that led to the FLA-2.0. The biggest points of the
|
||||
update are that the FLA now also covers patents and enables more practical
|
||||
outbound licensing options, including a reference to an external licensing
|
||||
policy. In addition, the new wording is much improved both in its compatibility
|
||||
with more jurisdictions as well as being easier to understand and apply.
|
||||
The final text and a new website are to launch in the coming weeks,
|
||||
so watch this space.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>The workshop would not have been possible without the generous support
|
||||
of all the event's sponsors. In particular, we would like to thank our
|
||||
Platinum Sponsors: Intel, Red Hat and The Linux Foundation.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
</body>
|
||||
<tags>
|
||||
<tag>front-page</tag>
|
||||
<tag content="Legal">Legal</tag>
|
||||
<tag content="Licensing">Licensing</tag>
|
||||
<tag content="Compliance">Compliance</tag>
|
||||
</tags>
|
||||
<author id="polina"/>
|
||||
|
||||
</html>
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user