Die TUX&GNU@school-Kolumne soll über ein Stück freie Lernsoftware, eine Webseite zum Thema und über eine Idee für ein sinnvolles Programm, das schulischen Zwecken dient, berichten.
</p>
<p>
Die Kolumne kann auch als zweimonatlicher <ahref="https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/tgs-de">Newsletter</a> bestellt werden.
Die Kolumne kann auch als zweimonatlicher <ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/mailman/listinfo/tgs-de">Newsletter</a> bestellt werden.
<li>2008-02-28 [NEWS] <ahref="/news/2008/news-20080228-01.html">FSFE calls on Microsoft to release interoperability information without restrictions</a></li>
<li>2007-09-17 [INTERVIEW] <ahref="http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20070919214307459">Interview with Georg Greve of FSFE, Jeremy Allison and Volker Lendecke of Samba, and FSFE's lawyer Carlo Piana (audio and transcript)</a></li>
<li>2007-09-17 [NEWS] FSFE: "<ahref="http://mail.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release-de/2007q3/000117.html">FSFE, Samba: Ein Triumph für die Freiheit und den freien Wettbewerb</a>"</li>
<li>2007-09-17 [NEWS] FSFE: "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release-de/2007q3/000117.html">FSFE, Samba: Ein Triumph für die Freiheit und den freien Wettbewerb</a>"</li>
<li>28. Mai 2006 [INTERVIEW] <ahref="http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=2006042816483566">Georg Greve spricht über die letzten Anhörungen (Audio und Transkript)</a></li>
<li>27. April 2006 [NACHRICHT] Microsoft: "<ahref="http://mail.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2006q2/000138.html">Unsere Softwarepatente verhindern Interoperabilität</a>"</li>
<li>21. April 2006 [NACHRICHT] FSFE: "<ahref="http://mail.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2006q2/000136.html">Microsoft schließt Kunden ein und drängt auf Softwarepatente, um Wettbewerb zu verhindern.</a>"</li>
<li>27. April 2006 [NACHRICHT] Microsoft: "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release/2006q2/000138.html">Unsere Softwarepatente verhindern Interoperabilität</a>"</li>
<li>21. April 2006 [NACHRICHT] FSFE: "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release/2006q2/000136.html">Microsoft schließt Kunden ein und drängt auf Softwarepatente, um Wettbewerb zu verhindern.</a>"</li>
<li>21. April 2006 [ARTIKEL] <ahref="article-20060421.html">Softwarepatente könnten das Wettbewerbsverfahren gegen Microsoft ad absurdum führen</a></li>
<li>31. März 2006 [INTERVIEW] <ahref="http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20060401001402147">Carlo Piana spricht über den Fall (Audio und Transkript)</a></li>
<li>7. März 2006 [DOKUMENT] <ahref="non_paper.pdf">Brief von FSFEs Anwalt Carlo Piana (PDF)</a></li>
<li>7. März 2006 [DOKUMENT] <ahref="fsfe_art18_reply_published_sourcecode.pdf">Antwort von FSFE und Samba-Team auf den "Art. 18"-Brief (PDF)</a></li>
<li>7. März 2006 [DOKUMENT] <ahref="fsfe_art18_reply-source_code_reference_license.pdf">Antwort von FSFE und Samba-Team auf den "Art. 18"-Brief zu Quellcode (PDF)</a></li>
<li>16. Februar 2006 [NACHRICHT] "<ahref="http://mail.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2006q1/000129.html">FSFE to Microsoft: stop complaining, and start complying!</a>"</li>
<li>26. Januar 2006 [NACHRICHT] "<ahref="http://mailman.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2006q1/000126.html">FSFE: "Microsoft bietet vergifteten Apfel an" - "Lob scheint voreilig gewesen zu sein"</a>"</li>
<li>23. November 2005 [NACHRICHT] "<ahref="http://mailman.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2005q4/000122.html">FSFE beantragt Beteiligung im Wettbewerbsverfahren gegen Microsoft</a>"</li>
<li>14. Oktober 2005 [NACHRICHT] "<ahref="http://mail.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2005q4/000118.html">Real Networks - Microsoft: "FSFE ist nicht käuflich und wird es nie sein"</a>"</li>
<li>7. Juni 2005 [NACHRICHT] "<ahref="http://mail.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2005q2/000105.html">FSFE: "Microsoft missbraucht den guten Willen von Frau Kroes" - "Europäische Kommission lässt sich auf einen juristischen Häuserkampf ein!"</a>"</li>
<li>1. April 2005 [NACHRICHT] "<ahref="http://mail.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2005q2/000098.html">Wie man Microsoft dazu bringt, die europäischen Behörden zu respektieren - FSFE empfiehlt laufende Überwachung</a>"</li>
<li>21. März 2005 [NACHRICHT] "<ahref="http://mail.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2005q1/000097.html">FSFE will helfen, Microsoft Beine zu machen</a>"</li>
<li>24. November 2004 [NACHRICHT] "<ahref="http://mailman.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2004q4/000083.html">Freiheit ist unbezahlbar, kostet aber Geld!</a>"</li>
<li>9. November 2004 [NACHRICHT] "<ahref="http://mailman.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2004q4/000081.html">Für die FSFE geht der Kampf weiter</a>"</li>
<li>1. Oktober 2004 [NACHRICHT] "<ahref="http://mailman.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2004q4/000075.html">Erste Anhöhrung im Wettbewerbsverfahren Microsoft vs. EG</a>"</li>
<li>16. Februar 2006 [NACHRICHT] "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release/2006q1/000129.html">FSFE to Microsoft: stop complaining, and start complying!</a>"</li>
<li>26. Januar 2006 [NACHRICHT] "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release/2006q1/000126.html">FSFE: "Microsoft bietet vergifteten Apfel an" - "Lob scheint voreilig gewesen zu sein"</a>"</li>
<li>23. November 2005 [NACHRICHT] "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release/2005q4/000122.html">FSFE beantragt Beteiligung im Wettbewerbsverfahren gegen Microsoft</a>"</li>
<li>14. Oktober 2005 [NACHRICHT] "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release/2005q4/000118.html">Real Networks - Microsoft: "FSFE ist nicht käuflich und wird es nie sein"</a>"</li>
<li>7. Juni 2005 [NACHRICHT] "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release/2005q2/000105.html">FSFE: "Microsoft missbraucht den guten Willen von Frau Kroes" - "Europäische Kommission lässt sich auf einen juristischen Häuserkampf ein!"</a>"</li>
<li>1. April 2005 [NACHRICHT] "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release/2005q2/000098.html">Wie man Microsoft dazu bringt, die europäischen Behörden zu respektieren - FSFE empfiehlt laufende Überwachung</a>"</li>
<li>21. März 2005 [NACHRICHT] "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release/2005q1/000097.html">FSFE will helfen, Microsoft Beine zu machen</a>"</li>
<li>24. November 2004 [NACHRICHT] "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release/2004q4/000083.html">Freiheit ist unbezahlbar, kostet aber Geld!</a>"</li>
<li>9. November 2004 [NACHRICHT] "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release/2004q4/000081.html">Für die FSFE geht der Kampf weiter</a>"</li>
<li>1. Oktober 2004 [NACHRICHT] "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release/2004q4/000075.html">Erste Anhöhrung im Wettbewerbsverfahren Microsoft vs. EG</a>"</li>
<li>30. September 2004 [DOKUMENT] <ahref="intervention-20040930.html">Antrag der Free Software Foundation Europe beim Europäischen Gerichtshof</a></li>
<li>29. September 2004 [NACHRICHT] "<ahref="http://mailman.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2004q3/000074.html">FSFE nicht geneigt, Microsofts Anwaltskosten zu zahlen</a>"</li>
<li>27. Juli 2004 [NACHRICHT] "<ahref="http://mailman.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2004q3/000067.html">FSFE wird Microsoft im Verfahren um seine Berufung gegen die Europäische Kommission herausfordern</a>"</li>
<li>29. September 2004 [NACHRICHT] "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release/2004q3/000074.html">FSFE nicht geneigt, Microsofts Anwaltskosten zu zahlen</a>"</li>
<li>27. Juli 2004 [NACHRICHT] "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release/2004q3/000067.html">FSFE wird Microsoft im Verfahren um seine Berufung gegen die Europäische Kommission herausfordern</a>"</li>
@ -97,30 +97,30 @@ href="http://piana.eu/msft_ends">discusses the ruling in detail</a>.</li>
<li>2008-02-28 [NEWS] <ahref="/news/2008/news-20080228-01.html">FSFE calls on Microsoft to release interoperability information without restrictions</a></li>
<li>2007-12-20 [NEWS] "<ahref="/news/2007/news-20071220-01.html">EU antitrust case over: Samba receives interoperability information</a>"</li>
<li>2007-09-17 [INTERVIEW] <ahref="http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20070919214307459">Interview with Georg Greve of FSFE, Jeremy Allison and Volker Lendecke of Samba, and FSFE's lawyer Carlo Piana (audio and transcript)</a></li>
<li>2007-09-17 [NEWS] FSFE: "<ahref="http://mail.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2007q3/000186.html">FSFE, Samba: A triumph for freedom of choice and competition.</a>"</li>
<li>2007-09-17 [NEWS] FSFE: "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release/2007q3/000186.html">FSFE, Samba: A triumph for freedom of choice and competition.</a>"</li>
<li>2006-04-28 [INTERVIEW] <ahref="http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=2006042816483566">Georg Greve talks about the recent hearings (audio and transcript)</a></li>
<li>2006-04-21 [NEWS] FSFE: "<ahref="http://mail.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2006q2/000136.html">Microsoft locks in customers and pushes software patents to prevent competition.</a>"</li>
<li>2006-04-21 [NEWS] FSFE: "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release/2006q2/000136.html">Microsoft locks in customers and pushes software patents to prevent competition.</a>"</li>
Could Reduce The Microsoft Antitrust Suit To Absurdity</a></li>
<li>2006-03-31 [INTERVIEW] <ahref="http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20060401001402147">Carlo Piana talks about the case (audio and transcript)</a></li>
<li>2006-03-07 [DOCUMENT] <ahref="non_paper.pdf">Letter from FSFE's lawyer Carlo Piana (PDF)</a></li>
<li>2006-03-07 [DOCUMENT] <ahref="fsfe_art18_reply_published_sourcecode.pdf">FSFE/Samba Team response to Art. 18 Letter (PDF)</a></li>
<li>2006-03-07 [DOCUMENT] <ahref="fsfe_art18_reply-source_code_reference_license.pdf">FSFE/Samba Team response to Art. 18 Letter on "source code" (PDF)</a></li>
<li>2006-02-16 [NEWS] "<ahref="http://mail.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2006q1/000129.html">FSFE to Microsoft: stop complaining, and start complying!</a>"</li>
<li>2006-02-16 [NEWS] "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release/2006q1/000129.html">FSFE to Microsoft: stop complaining, and start complying!</a>"</li>
<li>2005-11-23 [NEWS] "<ahref="http://mailman.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2005q4/000122.html">FSFE files application for leave to intervene in antitrust suit against Microsoft</a>"</li>
<li>2005-10-14 [NEWS] "<ahref="http://mail.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2005q4/000118.html">Real Networks - Microsoft: "FSFE is not and never will be for sale"</a>"</li>
<li>2005-06-07 [NEWS] "<ahref="http://mail.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2005q2/000105.html">FSFE: "Microsoft abuses the good will of Ms. Kroes" - "European Commission is about to enter legal house-to-house fighting!"</a>"</li>
<li>2005-04-01 [NEWS] "<ahref="http://mail.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2005q2/000098.html">How to make Microsoft respect European Authorities - FSFE recommends permanent monitoring</a>"</li>
<li>2005-03-21 [NEWS] "<ahref="http://mail.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2005q1/000097.html">FSFE to help bring Microsoft to its feet</a>"</li>
<li>2004-11-24 [NEWS] "<ahref="http://mailman.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2004q4/000083.html">Freedom is priceless, but has a cost!</a>"</li>
<li>2004-11-09 [NEWS] "<ahref="http://mailman.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2004q4/000081.html">For the FSFE, the battle continues</a>"</li>
<li>2004-10-01 [NEWS] "<ahref="http://mailman.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2004q4/000075.html">First hearing in the Microsoft Vs EC antitrust case</a>"</li>
<li>2005-11-23 [NEWS] "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release/2005q4/000122.html">FSFE files application for leave to intervene in antitrust suit against Microsoft</a>"</li>
<li>2005-10-14 [NEWS] "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release/2005q4/000118.html">Real Networks - Microsoft: "FSFE is not and never will be for sale"</a>"</li>
<li>2005-06-07 [NEWS] "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release/2005q2/000105.html">FSFE: "Microsoft abuses the good will of Ms. Kroes" - "European Commission is about to enter legal house-to-house fighting!"</a>"</li>
<li>2005-04-01 [NEWS] "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release/2005q2/000098.html">How to make Microsoft respect European Authorities - FSFE recommends permanent monitoring</a>"</li>
<li>2005-03-21 [NEWS] "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release/2005q1/000097.html">FSFE to help bring Microsoft to its feet</a>"</li>
<li>2004-11-24 [NEWS] "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release/2004q4/000083.html">Freedom is priceless, but has a cost!</a>"</li>
<li>2004-11-09 [NEWS] "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release/2004q4/000081.html">For the FSFE, the battle continues</a>"</li>
<li>2004-10-01 [NEWS] "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release/2004q4/000075.html">First hearing in the Microsoft Vs EC antitrust case</a>"</li>
<li>2004-09-30 [DOCUMENT] <ahref="intervention-20040930.html">Intervention to the Court of the European Union on behalf of the Free Software Foundation Europe</a></li>
<li>2004-09-29 [NEWS] "<ahref="http://mailman.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2004q3/000074.html">FSFE not inclined to pay legal costs of Microsoft</a>"</li>
<li>2004-07-27 [NEWS] "<ahref="http://mailman.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2004q3/000067.html">FSFE to challenge Microsoft in its appeal against European Commission</a>"</li>
<li>2004-09-29 [NEWS] "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release/2004q3/000074.html">FSFE not inclined to pay legal costs of Microsoft</a>"</li>
<li>2004-07-27 [NEWS] "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release/2004q3/000067.html">FSFE to challenge Microsoft in its appeal against European Commission</a>"</li>
@ -99,30 +99,30 @@ href="http://piana.eu/msft_ends">discusses the ruling in detail</a>.</li>
<li>2008-02-28 [NEWS] <ahref="/news/2008/news-20080228-01.html">FSFE calls on Microsoft to release interoperability information without restrictions</a></li>
<li>2007-12-20 [NEWS] "<ahref="/news/2007/news-20071220-01.html">EU antitrust case over: Samba receives interoperability information</a>"</li>
<li>2007-09-17 [INTERVIEW] <ahref="http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20070919214307459">Interview with Georg Greve of FSFE, Jeremy Allison and Volker Lendecke of Samba, and FSFE's lawyer Carlo Piana (audio and transcript)</a></li>
<li>2007-09-17 [NEWS] FSFE: "<ahref="http://mail.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2007q3/000186.html">FSFE, Samba: A triumph for freedom of choice and competition.</a>"</li>
<li>2007-09-17 [NEWS] FSFE: "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release/2007q3/000186.html">FSFE, Samba: A triumph for freedom of choice and competition.</a>"</li>
<li>2006-04-28 [INTERVIEW] <ahref="http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=2006042816483566">Georg Greve talks about the recent hearings (audio and transcript)</a></li>
<li>2006-04-21 [NEWS] FSFE: "<ahref="http://mail.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2006q2/000136.html">Microsoft locks in customers and pushes software patents to prevent competition.</a>"</li>
<li>2006-04-21 [NEWS] FSFE: "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release/2006q2/000136.html">Microsoft locks in customers and pushes software patents to prevent competition.</a>"</li>
Could Reduce The Microsoft Antitrust Suit To Absurdity</a></li>
<li>2006-03-31 [INTERVIEW] <ahref="http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20060401001402147">Carlo Piana talks about the case (audio and transcript)</a></li>
<li>2006-03-07 [DOCUMENT] <ahref="non_paper.pdf">Letter from FSFE's lawyer Carlo Piana (PDF)</a></li>
<li>2006-03-07 [DOCUMENT] <ahref="fsfe_art18_reply_published_sourcecode.pdf">FSFE/Samba Team response to Art. 18 Letter (PDF)</a></li>
<li>2006-03-07 [DOCUMENT] <ahref="fsfe_art18_reply-source_code_reference_license.pdf">FSFE/Samba Team response to Art. 18 Letter on "source code" (PDF)</a></li>
<li>2006-02-16 [NEWS] "<ahref="http://mail.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2006q1/000129.html">FSFE to Microsoft: stop complaining, and start complying!</a>"</li>
<li>2006-02-16 [NEWS] "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release/2006q1/000129.html">FSFE to Microsoft: stop complaining, and start complying!</a>"</li>
<li>2005-11-23 [NEWS] "<ahref="http://mailman.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2005q4/000122.html">FSFE files application for leave to intervene in antitrust suit against Microsoft</a>"</li>
<li>2005-10-14 [NEWS] "<ahref="http://mail.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2005q4/000118.html">Real Networks - Microsoft: "FSFE is not and never will be for sale"</a>"</li>
<li>2005-06-07 [NEWS] "<ahref="http://mail.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2005q2/000105.html">FSFE: "Microsoft abuses the good will of Ms. Kroes" - "European Commission is about to enter legal house-to-house fighting!"</a>"</li>
<li>2005-04-01 [NEWS] "<ahref="http://mail.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2005q2/000098.html">How to make Microsoft respect European Authorities - FSFE recommends permanent monitoring</a>"</li>
<li>2005-03-21 [NEWS] "<ahref="http://mail.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2005q1/000097.html">FSFE to help bring Microsoft to its feet</a>"</li>
<li>2004-11-24 [NEWS] "<ahref="http://mailman.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2004q4/000083.html">Freedom is priceless, but has a cost!</a>"</li>
<li>2004-11-09 [NEWS] "<ahref="http://mailman.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2004q4/000081.html">For the FSFE, the battle continues</a>"</li>
<li>2004-10-01 [NEWS] "<ahref="http://mailman.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2004q4/000075.html">First hearing in the Microsoft Vs EC antitrust case</a>"</li>
<li>2005-11-23 [NEWS] "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release/2005q4/000122.html">FSFE files application for leave to intervene in antitrust suit against Microsoft</a>"</li>
<li>2005-10-14 [NEWS] "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release/2005q4/000118.html">Real Networks - Microsoft: "FSFE is not and never will be for sale"</a>"</li>
<li>2005-06-07 [NEWS] "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release/2005q2/000105.html">FSFE: "Microsoft abuses the good will of Ms. Kroes" - "European Commission is about to enter legal house-to-house fighting!"</a>"</li>
<li>2005-04-01 [NEWS] "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release/2005q2/000098.html">How to make Microsoft respect European Authorities - FSFE recommends permanent monitoring</a>"</li>
<li>2005-03-21 [NEWS] "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release/2005q1/000097.html">FSFE to help bring Microsoft to its feet</a>"</li>
<li>2004-11-24 [NEWS] "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release/2004q4/000083.html">Freedom is priceless, but has a cost!</a>"</li>
<li>2004-11-09 [NEWS] "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release/2004q4/000081.html">For the FSFE, the battle continues</a>"</li>
<li>2004-10-01 [NEWS] "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release/2004q4/000075.html">First hearing in the Microsoft Vs EC antitrust case</a>"</li>
<li>2004-09-30 [DOCUMENT] <ahref="intervention-20040930.html">Intervention to the Court of the European Union on behalf of the Free Software Foundation Europe</a></li>
<li>2004-09-29 [NEWS] "<ahref="http://mailman.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2004q3/000074.html">FSFE not inclined to pay legal costs of Microsoft</a>"</li>
<li>2004-07-27 [NEWS] "<ahref="http://mailman.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2004q3/000067.html">FSFE to challenge Microsoft in its appeal against European Commission</a>"</li>
<li>2004-09-29 [NEWS] "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release/2004q3/000074.html">FSFE not inclined to pay legal costs of Microsoft</a>"</li>
<li>2004-07-27 [NEWS] "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release/2004q3/000067.html">FSFE to challenge Microsoft in its appeal against European Commission</a>"</li>
<li>2008-02-28 [NEWS] <ahref="/news/2008/news-20080228-01.html">FSFE calls on Microsoft to release interoperability information without restrictions</a></li>
<li>2007-12-20 [NEWS] "<ahref="/news/2007/news-20071220-01.html">EU antitrust case over: Samba receives interoperability information</a>"</li>
<li>2007-09-17 [INTERVIEW] <ahref="http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20070919214307459">Interview with Georg Greve of FSFE, Jeremy Allison and Volker Lendecke of Samba, and FSFE's lawyer Carlo Piana (audio and transcript)</a></li>
<li>2007-09-17 [NEWS] FSFE: "<ahref="http://mail.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2007q3/000186.html">FSFE, Samba: A triumph for freedom of choice and competition.</a>"</li>
<li>2007-09-17 [NEWS] FSFE: "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release/2007q3/000186.html">FSFE, Samba: A triumph for freedom of choice and competition.</a>"</li>
<li>2006-04-28 [INTERVIEW] <ahref="http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=2006042816483566">Georg Greve talks about the recent hearings (audio and transcript)</a></li>
<li>2006-04-21 [NEWS] FSFE: "<ahref="http://mail.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2006q2/000136.html">Microsoft locks in customers and pushes software patents to prevent competition.</a>"</li>
<li>2006-04-21 [NEWS] FSFE: "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release/2006q2/000136.html">Microsoft locks in customers and pushes software patents to prevent competition.</a>"</li>
Could Reduce The Microsoft Antitrust Suit To Absurdity</a></li>
<li>2006-03-31 [INTERVIEW] <ahref="http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20060401001402147">Carlo Piana talks about the case (audio and transcript)</a></li>
<li>2006-03-07 [DOCUMENT] <ahref="non_paper.pdf">Letter from FSFE's lawyer Carlo Piana (PDF)</a></li>
<li>2006-03-07 [DOCUMENT] <ahref="fsfe_art18_reply_published_sourcecode.pdf">FSFE/Samba Team response to Art. 18 Letter (PDF)</a></li>
<li>2006-03-07 [DOCUMENT] <ahref="fsfe_art18_reply-source_code_reference_license.pdf">FSFE/Samba Team response to Art. 18 Letter on "source code" (PDF)</a></li>
<li>2006-02-16 [NEWS] "<ahref="http://mail.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2006q1/000129.html">FSFE to Microsoft: stop complaining, and start complying!</a>"</li>
<li>2006-02-16 [NEWS] "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release/2006q1/000129.html">FSFE to Microsoft: stop complaining, and start complying!</a>"</li>
<li>2005-11-23 [NEWS] "<ahref="http://mailman.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2005q4/000122.html">FSFE files application for leave to intervene in antitrust suit against Microsoft</a>"</li>
<li>2005-10-14 [NEWS] "<ahref="http://mail.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2005q4/000118.html">Real Networks - Microsoft: "FSFE is not and never will be for sale"</a>"</li>
<li>2005-06-07 [NEWS] "<ahref="http://mail.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2005q2/000105.html">FSFE: "Microsoft abuses the good will of Ms. Kroes" - "European Commission is about to enter legal house-to-house fighting!"</a>"</li>
<li>2005-04-01 [NEWS] "<ahref="http://mail.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2005q2/000098.html">How to make Microsoft respect European Authorities - FSFE recommends permanent monitoring</a>"</li>
<li>2005-03-21 [NEWS] "<ahref="http://mail.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2005q1/000097.html">FSFE to help bring Microsoft to its feet</a>"</li>
<li>2004-11-24 [NEWS] "<ahref="http://mailman.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2004q4/000083.html">Freedom is priceless, but has a cost!</a>"</li>
<li>2004-11-09 [NEWS] "<ahref="http://mailman.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2004q4/000081.html">For the FSFE, the battle continues</a>"</li>
<li>2004-10-01 [NEWS] "<ahref="http://mailman.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2004q4/000075.html">First hearing in the Microsoft Vs EC antitrust case</a>"</li>
<li>2005-11-23 [NEWS] "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release/2005q4/000122.html">FSFE files application for leave to intervene in antitrust suit against Microsoft</a>"</li>
<li>2005-10-14 [NEWS] "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release/2005q4/000118.html">Real Networks - Microsoft: "FSFE is not and never will be for sale"</a>"</li>
<li>2005-06-07 [NEWS] "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release/2005q2/000105.html">FSFE: "Microsoft abuses the good will of Ms. Kroes" - "European Commission is about to enter legal house-to-house fighting!"</a>"</li>
<li>2005-04-01 [NEWS] "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release/2005q2/000098.html">How to make Microsoft respect European Authorities - FSFE recommends permanent monitoring</a>"</li>
<li>2005-03-21 [NEWS] "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release/2005q1/000097.html">FSFE to help bring Microsoft to its feet</a>"</li>
<li>2004-11-24 [NEWS] "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release/2004q4/000083.html">Freedom is priceless, but has a cost!</a>"</li>
<li>2004-11-09 [NEWS] "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release/2004q4/000081.html">For the FSFE, the battle continues</a>"</li>
<li>2004-10-01 [NEWS] "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release/2004q4/000075.html">First hearing in the Microsoft Vs EC antitrust case</a>"</li>
<li>2004-09-30 [DOCUMENT] <ahref="intervention-20040930.html">Intervention to the Court of the European Union on behalf of the Free Software Foundation Europe</a></li>
<li>2004-09-29 [NEWS] "<ahref="http://mailman.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2004q3/000074.html">FSFE not inclined to pay legal costs of Microsoft</a>"</li>
<li>2004-07-27 [NEWS] "<ahref="http://mailman.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2004q3/000067.html">FSFE to challenge Microsoft in its appeal against European Commission</a>"</li>
<li>2004-09-29 [NEWS] "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release/2004q3/000074.html">FSFE not inclined to pay legal costs of Microsoft</a>"</li>
<li>2004-07-27 [NEWS] "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release/2004q3/000067.html">FSFE to challenge Microsoft in its appeal against European Commission</a>"</li>
<li>2008-02-28 [NEWS] <ahref="/news/2008/news-20080228-01.html">FSFE calls on Microsoft to release interoperability information without restrictions</a></li>
<li>2007-12-20 [NEWS] "<ahref="/news/2007/news-20071220-01.html">EU antitrust case over: Samba receives interoperability information</a>"</li>
<li>2007-09-17 [INTERVIEW] <ahref="http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20070919214307459">Interview with Georg Greve of FSFE, Jeremy Allison and Volker Lendecke of Samba, and FSFE's lawyer Carlo Piana (audio and transcript)</a></li>
<li>2007-09-17 [NEWS] FSFE: "<ahref="http://mail.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release-it/2007q3/000158.html">FSFE, Samba: un trionfo per la libertà di scelta e la concorrenza.</a>"</li>
<li>2007-09-17 [NEWS] FSFE: "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release-it/2007q3/000158.html">FSFE, Samba: un trionfo per la libertà di scelta e la concorrenza.</a>"</li>
<li>2006-04-28 [INTERVISTA] <ahref="http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=2006042816483566">Georg Greve parla delle recenti udienze (audio e trascrizione)</a></li>
<li>2006-04-21 [NEWS] FSFE: "<ahref="http://mail.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2006q2/000136.html">Microsoft locks in customers and pushes software patents to prevent competition.</a>"</li>
<li>2006-04-21 [NEWS] FSFE: "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release/2006q2/000136.html">Microsoft locks in customers and pushes software patents to prevent competition.</a>"</li>
possono vanificare la causa antitrust contro Microsoft</a></li>
<li>2006-04-31 [INTERVISTA] <ahref="http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20060401001402147">Carlo Piana parla della causa (audio e trascrizione)</a></li>
<li>2006-03-07 [DOCUMENTO] <ahref="non_paper.pdf">Lettera del legale della FSFE Carlo Piana (PDF)</a></li>
<li>2006-03-07 [DOCUMENTO] <ahref="fsfe_art18_reply_published_sourcecode.pdf">Risposta di FSFE/Samba Team alla lettera Art. 18 (PDF)</a></li>
<li>2006-03-07 [DOCUMENTO] <ahref="fsfe_art18_reply-source_code_reference_license.pdf">Risposta di FSFE/Samba Team alla lettera Art. 18 a proposito del "codice sorgente" (PDF)</a></li>
<li>2006-02-16 [NEWS] "<ahref="http://mail.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2006q1/000129.html">FSFE to Microsoft: stop complaining, and start complying!</a>"</li>
<li>2006-01-26 [NEWS] "<ahref="http://mail.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release-it/2006q1/000113.html">FSFE: "Microsoft offre una mela avvelenata"</a>"</li>
<li>2005-11-23 [NEWS] "<ahref="http://mailman.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2005q4/000122.html">FSFE files application for leave to intervene in antitrust suit against Microsoft</a>"</li>
<li>2005-10-14 [NEWS] "<ahref="http://mail.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2005q4/000118.html">Real Networks - Microsoft: "FSFE is not and never will be for sale"</a>"</li>
<li>2005-06-07 [NEWS] "<ahref="http://mail.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2005q2/000105.html">FSFE: "Microsoft abuses the good will of Ms. Kroes" - "European Commission is about to enter legal house-to-house fighting!"</a>"</li>
<li>2005-04-01 [NEWS] "<ahref="http://mail.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2005q2/000098.html">How to make Microsoft respect European Authorities - FSFE recommends permanent monitoring</a>"</li>
<li>2005-03-21 [NEWS] "<ahref="http://mail.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2005q1/000097.html">FSFE to help bring Microsoft to its feet</a>"</li>
<li>2004-11-24 [NEWS] "<ahref="http://mailman.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release-it/2004q4/000065.html">La libertà non ha prezzo, ma ha un costo!</a>"</li>
<li>2004-11-09 [NEWS] "<ahref="http://mailman.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release-it/2004q4/000059.html">Per la FSFE, la battaglia continua</a>"</li>
<li>2004-10-01 [NEWS] "<ahref="http://mailman.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release-it/2004q3/000055.html">Conclusa la prima udienza nel caso Microsoft contro CE/concorrenza</a>"</li>
<li>2006-02-16 [NEWS] "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release/2006q1/000129.html">FSFE to Microsoft: stop complaining, and start complying!</a>"</li>
<li>2006-01-26 [NEWS] "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release-it/2006q1/000113.html">FSFE: "Microsoft offre una mela avvelenata"</a>"</li>
<li>2005-11-23 [NEWS] "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release/2005q4/000122.html">FSFE files application for leave to intervene in antitrust suit against Microsoft</a>"</li>
<li>2005-10-14 [NEWS] "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release/2005q4/000118.html">Real Networks - Microsoft: "FSFE is not and never will be for sale"</a>"</li>
<li>2005-06-07 [NEWS] "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release/2005q2/000105.html">FSFE: "Microsoft abuses the good will of Ms. Kroes" - "European Commission is about to enter legal house-to-house fighting!"</a>"</li>
<li>2005-04-01 [NEWS] "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release/2005q2/000098.html">How to make Microsoft respect European Authorities - FSFE recommends permanent monitoring</a>"</li>
<li>2005-03-21 [NEWS] "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release/2005q1/000097.html">FSFE to help bring Microsoft to its feet</a>"</li>
<li>2004-11-24 [NEWS] "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release-it/2004q4/000065.html">La libertà non ha prezzo, ma ha un costo!</a>"</li>
<li>2004-11-09 [NEWS] "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release-it/2004q4/000059.html">Per la FSFE, la battaglia continua</a>"</li>
<li>2004-10-01 [NEWS] "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release-it/2004q3/000055.html">Conclusa la prima udienza nel caso Microsoft contro CE/concorrenza</a>"</li>
<li>2004-09-30 [DOCUMENTO] <ahref="intervention-20040930.html">Intervento presso la Corte dell'Unione Europea a nome della Free Software Foundation Europe</a></li>
<li>2004-09-29 [NEWS] "<ahref="http://mailman.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release-it/2004q3/000054.html">La FSFE non pensa di pagare le spese legali di Microsoft</a>"</li>
<li>2004-07-27 [NEWS] "<ahref="http://mailman.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release-it/2004q3/000045.html">La FSFE sfida Microsoft nel suo appello contro la Commissione Europea</a>"</li>
<li>2004-09-29 [NEWS] "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release-it/2004q3/000054.html">La FSFE non pensa di pagare le spese legali di Microsoft</a>"</li>
<li>2004-07-27 [NEWS] "<ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release-it/2004q3/000045.html">La FSFE sfida Microsoft nel suo appello contro la Commissione Europea</a>"</li>
<li>2007-09-17 [INTERVIEW] <ahref="http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20070919214307459">Interview with Georg Greve of FSFE, Jeremy Allison and Volker Lendecke of Samba, and FSFE's lawyer Carlo Piana (audio and transcript)</a></li>
Ich persönlich bedauere jeden einzelnen der hier genannten Stichpunkte. Es
gibt noch wesentlich mehr Mängel - auf ein paar davon haben wir Herrn
Professor Köhler im Rahmen unserer <ahref="http://mail.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release-de/2004q2/000030.html">Serie Offener Briefe zu Softwarepatenten
Professor Köhler im Rahmen unserer <ahref="https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/press-release-de/2004q2/000030.html">Serie Offener Briefe zu Softwarepatenten
im Juni</a> aufmerksam gemacht.
Von Amts wegen muss Sie aber der hier
genannte erste Punkt erschrecken: "Der Anteil der KMUs würde abnehmen".
