added some more explanations.
svn path=/trunk/; revision=4218
This commit is contained in:
parent
62094b2514
commit
1dde5af4d2
|
@ -58,14 +58,26 @@ most of them caused by the abuse of the unclear word "Intellectual
|
|||
Property". The ambiguity of such word makes it difficult to judge if
|
||||
the Commission is asking Microsoft to give up copyright on parts of
|
||||
their source code or license to everybody its patents on the protocols
|
||||
and interfaces they have developed. An even bigger problem with the
|
||||
and interfaces they have developed or even give up some valuable
|
||||
"trade secrets". An even bigger problem with the
|
||||
Decision is that it allows Microsoft to use socalled "RAND"
|
||||
(Reasonable And Not Discriminatory) licenses. As repeated often, the
|
||||
RAND clauses for using patented interfaces or protocols actually
|
||||
discriminate Free Software implementations since, however cheap those
|
||||
licenses ca be, they add a limit to the free distribution of software
|
||||
licenses can be, they add a limit to the free distribution of software
|
||||
(making it non-free).</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>In the end, FSF Europe believes that Microsoft should reveal all
|
||||
information necessary to achieve complete interoperation with its
|
||||
systems, be it the Media Player or the Directory Service. To achieve
|
||||
this it is not necessary to disclose source code developed by
|
||||
Microsoft, it is not necessary to reveal "trade secrets" as protocols
|
||||
and interfaces are already 'public' (since they can be reverse
|
||||
engineered) but it is unconvenient to use them. It is extremely
|
||||
important that the DG Competition guards the market and also avoids
|
||||
that software patents are legalised in Europe, so that Free Software
|
||||
implementations of those interfaces will always be possible.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- End page content -->
|
||||
|
||||
</body>
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
|
|||
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
|
||||
|
||||
<projectset>
|
||||
<project type="legal">
|
||||
<title>Microsoft versus European Union citizens</title>
|
||||
<description>
|
||||
In 2001 the European Union, through the DG Competition of the
|
||||
European Commission (lead by prof. Monti), started investigating
|
||||
on Microsoft dominant position in the desktop operating systems.
|
||||
The Free Software Foundation Europe was invited from the
|
||||
EC to represent the stances of Free Software movement. In 2004
|
||||
FSFE is participating to the appeal to defend again free
|
||||
competition and freedom of choice against abuses.
|
||||
</description>
|
||||
<link>/projects/ms-vs-eu/ms-vs-eu.html</link>
|
||||
</project>
|
||||
</projectset>
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue