FSFE/fsfe-website
24
30
Fork 88
Code Issues 62 Pull Requests 12 Wiki Activity

Fixed several typos (#3559)
All checks were successful
continuous-integration/drone/push Build is passing
Details

Browse Source 
Fixed several typos

Co-authored-by: Alejandro Criado-Pérez <alejandro@criadoperez.com>
Reviewed-on: #3559
Co-authored-by: Alejandro Criado-Pérez <criadoperez@fsfe.org>
Co-committed-by: Alejandro Criado-Pérez <criadoperez@fsfe.org>
This commit is contained in:
Alejandro Criado-Pérez 2023-07-09 04:51:50 +00:00 committed by tobiasd
parent d41e8c9195
commit 1b48d1ec6b
10 changed files with 12 additions and 12 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
freesoftware/democracy.en.xhtml
View File

@ -63,7 +63,7 @@
only does our communication depend on software, but
also a big part of society's infrastructure. FSFE wants to voice the
interests of computer users, and to hand control of software's future to
everybody. Society cannot afford to be dependant on private interests when it
everybody. Society cannot afford to be dependent on private interests when it
comes to a tool as important as software.
</p>

2
freesoftware/education/edu-related-content.en.xhtml
View File

@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
<li><a href="/freesoftware/education/argumentation.html">Why give precedence to Free Software at school?</a></li>
<li><a href="/activities/mankind/lsm2002/index.html">UNESCO Director General, M. Koïchiro Matsuura's and UNESCO#s Free Software portal</a></li>
<li>Our <a href="/about/associates/ofset/associate">associated organization</a>: OFSET</li>
<li><a href="/activities/mankind/lsm2002/press-release.html">Press releas to LSM 2002</a></li>
<li><a href="/activities/mankind/lsm2002/press-release.html">Press release to LSM 2002</a></li>
<li><a href="/activities/policy.html">On July 9 2013 the prioritisation of Free Software was voted by the French parliament for the first time</a></li>
<li><a href="/news/2011/news-20111128-02.html#education">Education paragraph in FSFE's submission to European Commission's Green Paper "Horizon 2020"</a></li>
<li><a href="/news/2001/article2001-12-17-01.html">OLinux interview with Georg Greve on FSF’s purpose for education</a></li>

2
freesoftware/education/education.en.xhtml
View File

@ -68,7 +68,7 @@
book</a> about Free Software, our <a href="/activities/yh4f/index.html">coding competition</a> for
teenagers, or a <a href="https://lernenwiedieprofis.ch">campaign</a>
(DE) about Free Software in education. You can also help us
collect material introducing programming to childen by adding
collect material introducing programming to children by adding
information in our <a href="https://wiki.fsfe.org/Activities/ProgrammingForChildren">wiki</a>.
If you agree that students should learn Free Software and schools
should use Free Software, please share this page. Support

2
freesoftware/gnuproject.en.xhtml
View File

@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ for people to use a third party kernel called Linux with GNU systems.
Many people use the name "Linux" for this variant of GNU, but this
prevents people from hearing of the GNU project and its goal of
software freedom. FSFE asks people to use the term "GNU/Linux" or
"GNU+Linux" when refering to such systems.
"GNU+Linux" when referring to such systems.
</p>
</body>

2
freesoftware/legal/faq.en.xhtml
View File

@ -338,7 +338,7 @@ Copyright is an intangible asset and is treated no differently than other proper
</p>
<p>
Nevertheless, as a general rule, the creator of an original work will retain ownership of the copright even after death by default. In the EU and many other jurisdictions, this retention of ownership lasts for 70 years after the death of the author. In practical terms for software projects with deceased developers, this would mean that a software project would need to contact the estate of a deceased developer to ask for consent for any relicensing.
Nevertheless, as a general rule, the creator of an original work will retain ownership of the copyright even after death by default. In the EU and many other jurisdictions, this retention of ownership lasts for 70 years after the death of the author. In practical terms for software projects with deceased developers, this would mean that a software project would need to contact the estate of a deceased developer to ask for consent for any relicensing.
</p>
<p>

4
freesoftware/standards/eifv2.en.xhtml
View File

@ -190,7 +190,7 @@
<ul>
<li><p>Like any strategic consideration, looking into Open Standards does
often take an initial extra effort. IT is not usually a mission priority
in public administrations. Therefore, explicitely naming "priorities" here
in public administrations. Therefore, explicitly naming "priorities" here
preserves the status quo.</p></li>
<li><p>"Legacy" implies that public administrations should look at the
@ -407,7 +407,7 @@
<p>
Meanwhile, Free Software ("open source") as a key driver of
interoperability is relegated to a footnote, which is the only occurence
interoperability is relegated to a footnote, which is the only occurrence
of the term in the entire document. The elimination of Free Software from
the text could not have been more systematic.
</p>

2
freesoftware/standards/minimalisticstandards.en.xhtml
View File

@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
It will dominate their choice of software for several years, possibly
decades. The more an organisation saves its precious writings, recordings
or pictures electronically, the more important it becomes to secure
continued access to the documents. These decisions, directly or indirecty,
continued access to the documents. These decisions, directly or indirectly,
lead to the funding of the initial development and maintenance of
data-formats, whether they be "good or bad" formats. The choices taken at
one time naturally affect the available choices in the future: Many

4
freesoftware/standards/ps.en.xhtml
View File

@ -45,7 +45,7 @@
"<a href="http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/newsroom/cf/itemshortdetail.cfm?item_id=3371">IPR
in ICT standardisation</a>", although "Patents in ICT
standardisation" would have been a more suitable name because the
discussion was exlusively about the interaction of patents and
discussion was exclusively about the interaction of patents and
ICT standardisation.</p>
<p>Patents and standards are fundamentally at odds, so many people
@ -409,7 +409,7 @@ her presentation</a>,
"<a href="http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/newsroom/cf/document.cfm?action=display&amp;doc_id=3636&amp;userservice_id=1&amp;request.id=0">
Standards, Patents and the Dynamics of Innovation on the Web</a>." The W3C is
indeed the only Standards Setting Organisation (SSO) that has a
sufficient patent policy for its standards in order to accomodate
sufficient patent policy for its standards in order to accommodate
all legitimate business models.</p>
<p>From the perspective of most SMEs, 100.000 EUR patent research costs

2
freesoftware/standards/transparency-letter.en.xhtml
View File

@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
<li>Does Rule 103 also cover transparency in procurement procedures, in particular regarding the procurement of software and related services? Do the requirements of Rule 103 go above and beyond the requirements of <a href="http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32004L0018:En:HTML">Directive 2004/EC/18</a> on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works  contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts?</li>
</ol>
<p>Our organisations welcome the committment of the European Parliament to the principles of openness and transparency. We stand ready to assist the Parliament in improving the possibilities for European citizens to follow and participate in the Parliament's work. We believe that Free Software and Open Standards will be essential to reaching this goal, and are pleased to put our expertise at your disposal.</p>
<p>Our organisations welcome the commitment of the European Parliament to the principles of openness and transparency. We stand ready to assist the Parliament in improving the possibilities for European citizens to follow and participate in the Parliament's work. We believe that Free Software and Open Standards will be essential to reaching this goal, and are pleased to put our expertise at your disposal.</p>
<p>Karsten Gerloff, President, Free Software Foundation Europe</p>
<p>Jim Killock, Executive Director, Open Rights Group</p>

2
freesoftware/sustainability/sustainability.en.xhtml
View File

@ -880,7 +880,7 @@ Software enables sustainable ecosystems</h3>
<p>To achieve digital sustainability, it is a political necessity to prevent short hardware lifetimes and corresponding linear business models and to enable free reuse of devices. Neither technical measures (e.g. locking the bootloader) nor legal measures (e.g. general terms and conditions and EULAs) that aim to prevent the installation of alternative operating systems may be permitted. <strong>Users must be given the right to install the operating system of their choice on their own devices, as well as any software.</strong></p>
<p>
In the past decades, however, politics often supported manufacturers' intentions in locking down devices and creating a linear use of hardware in that reuse or modification of the hardware is not allowed or enabled. The Digital Millenium Copyright Act is an example as is the European Information Society Directive. Both are implementations of the WIPO Copyright Treaty that introduced the illegality of any activities aiming to upgrade or upcycle devices by any means circumventing digital restrictions management.
In the past decades, however, politics often supported manufacturers' intentions in locking down devices and creating a linear use of hardware in that reuse or modification of the hardware is not allowed or enabled. The Digital Millennium Copyright Act is an example as is the European Information Society Directive. Both are implementations of the WIPO Copyright Treaty that introduced the illegality of any activities aiming to upgrade or upcycle devices by any means circumventing digital restrictions management.
</p>
<p>